SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

National Level Determinants of the Representative Quality of the Member States in the European Parliament

Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinin Avrupa Parlamentosu’nda ki Temsil Kalitelerinin Ulusal Boyutta ki Belirleyicileri

Abdullah YUVACI
Pages
1–15
Publication Date
2011-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article finds that the member states from Eastern Europe and the member states with smaller populations and higher electoral turnouts have higher representative quality in the European Parliament

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article studies national factors which determine the representative quality of the member states in the European Parliament.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The representative quality refers to the average national political experience of representatives of member states in the European Parliament.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article finds that the member states from Eastern Europe and the member states with smaller populations and higher electoral turnouts have higher representative quality in the European Parliament
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Temsil Kalitesi · Aday Kalitesi · Avrupa Parlamentosu

Abstract

This article studies national factors which determine the representative quality of the member states in the European Parliament. The representative quality refers to the average national political experience of representatives of member states in the European Parliament. The article finds that the member states from Eastern Europe and the member states with smaller populations and higher electoral turnouts have higher representative quality in the European Parliament

Özet

Bu çalışma ulusal düzeyde ele alınan bazı faktörlerin Avrupa Birliği ülkelerinin Avrupa Parlamentosu’nda ki temsil kalitesine etkilerini analiz etmektedir. Bu makale de ‘temsil kalitesi’ Avrupa Birliği ülkelerinin Avrupa Parlamentosu’nda ki temsilcilerinin geçmiş siyasi tecrübeleri kantitafif yöntemlerle hesaplanarak ölçülmüştür. Çalışma, Doğu Avrupa ülkelerinin ve nüfus bakımından küçük ve siyasi katılımın yüksek olduğu ülkelerin temsil kalitesinin daha fazla olduğunu bulmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

YUVACI, A. (2011). National Level Determinants of the Representative Quality of the Member States in the European Parliament. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 1–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/715268

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Auers, Daunis, (2005) “European Elections in Eight New EU Member States”, Electoral Studies, Volume 24, No. 4, 747-54.
  2. Baimbridge, Mark D, (2005) “Euphoria to Apathy: EP Turnout in the New Member States”, in Juliet Lodge (ed), The 2004 Elections to the European Parliament. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 45-54.
  3. Best, Heinrich and Maurizio Cotta (eds), (2000) Parliamentary Representatives in Europe 1848 – 2000: Legislative Recruitment and Careers in Eleven European Countries. New York: Oxford University. Bond, Jon R., Richard Fleisher, and Jeffery C. Talbert (1997) “Partisan Differences in Candidate Quality in Open Seat House Races, 1976- 1994”,
  4. Political Research Quarterly, Volume 50, No. 2, 281-99.
  5. Borchert, Jens and Jurgen Zeiss (eds), (2003) The Political Class in Advanced Democracies. Oxford University Press,
  6. New York. Bowler, Shaun, and David M. Farrell, (1995) “The Organizing of the European Ordination”, British Journal of Political Science, Volume 25, No. 2, Committees, Specilization and Co- 219-43.
  7. Carey, John M., and Matthew Soberg Shugart, (1995) “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: a Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas” Electoral Studies, Volume 14, No. 4, 417-39.
  8. Carson, Jamie L., Erik J. Engstrom, and Jason M. Roberts, (2007) “Candidate Quality, the Personal Vote, and the Incumbency Advantage in Congress”, American Political Science Review, Volume 101, No. 2, 289-301.
  9. Corbett, Richard, Francis Jacobs, and Michael Shackleton, (2003)
  10. The European Parliament, Fifth Edition.
  11. John Harper, London. Corbett, Richard, (2005) “European Parliament 1999-2004”, In Juliet Lodge (ed), The 2004 Elections to the European Parliament. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 8-17.
  12. Farrell, David D., (2001) Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. Palgrave, New York. Farrell, David D. and Roger Scully, (2007) Representing Europe’s Citizens? Electoral Representation. Oxford University Press, New York. and the Failure of Parliamentary Hix, Simon, Abdul Noury, and Gerard Roland, (2006) “Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament”, American Journal of Political Science, Volume 50, No. 2, 494-511.
  13. Judge, David and David Earnshaw, (2003)
  14. The European Parliament. Palgrave, New York. Kaeding, Michael, (2004) “Rapporteurship Allocation in the European Parliament: Information or Distribution?” European Union Politics, Volume 5, No. 3, 353-71.
  15. Kronsell, Annica, (2002) “Can Small States Influence EU Norms?” Scandinavian Studies Volume 74, No. 3, 287-304.
  16. Lodge, Juliet (