SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

A Research on Determining the Relationship Between Quality Perceptions of University Students with the Level of Satisfaction and Recommendation

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kalite Algıları İle Memnuniyet ve Tavsiye Etme Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişkiyi Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma

Yunus TOPSAKAL
Fatma Nur İPLİK
Pages
82–94
Publication Date
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that there is a significant relationship between satisfaction and recommendation with perceived quality

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A significant increase in the number of universities has been observed in recent times in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the direction of this situation, no longer the competition among higher education institutions began to emerge.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that there is a significant relationship between satisfaction and recommendation with perceived quality
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Algılanan Hizmet Kalitesi · Memnuniyet · Tavsiye Etme

Abstract

A significant increase in the number of universities has been observed in recent times in Turkey. In the direction of this situation, no longer the competition among higher education institutions began to emerge. Universities began to improve their quality in various ways to gain competitive advantages. The aim of this paper is measuring the students perceived service quality, satisfaction and recommendation. This paper was intended to reveal the relationship between satisfaction and recommendationwith perceived quality. To this end, a leading tourism faculty was chosen to employ questionnare. The prepared questionnare was employed only senior students. The results showed that there is a significant relationship between satisfaction and recommendation with perceived quality

Özet

gözlemlenmektedir. Bu artışla beraber yükseköğretim kurumları arasında rekabet artmaya başlamıştır. Rekabette önde olmak için üniversiteler kalitelerini çeşitli yollarla arttırmaya başlamıştır. Bu araştırmada turizm öğrencilerinin hizmet kalitesi algıları, memnuniyetleri ve tavsiye etme niyetleri ölçülmüştür. Ayrıca memnuniyet ve tavsiyenin kalite ile ilişkisinin ortaya çıkarılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç için ülkemizdeki önde gelen bir üniversitenin Turizm Fakültesi seçilmiş ve son sınıf öğrencilerine literatür taraması sonucu elde edilen anket formu uygulanmıştır. Analiz sonucunda elde edilen bulgulara göre öğrencilerin memnuniyeti ve tavsiye etme niyeti ile algılanan kalite arasında anlamlı ilişki bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca öğrencilerin kalitenin ‘idari personel’, ‘uluslararasılaşma’ ve ‘memnuniyet’ boyutlarına ilişkin algıları cinsiyete göre farklılık göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPSAKAL, Y., İPLİK, F. N. (2013). A Research on Determining the Relationship Between Quality Perceptions of University Students with the Level of Satisfaction and Recommendation. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 82–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/715246

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aldridge, S., Rowley, J. (1998). “Measuring Customer Satisfaction in Higher Education”, Journal of Quality Assurance in Educatioan, 6 (4): 197- 205. Anderson, E. (1995). “High Tech v. High Touch: A Case Studyof TQM Implementation in Higher Education”, Managing Service Quality, 5(2): 48-56.
  2. Barnes, B.R. (2007). “Analyzing Service Quality: The Case of Post- Graduate Chinese Students”, Journal of Total Quality Managemnent and Business Excellence, 18 (3): 313-331.
  3. Brochado, A. (2009). “Comparing Alternative Instruments to Measure Service Quality in Higher Education”, Journal of Quality Assurance in Education, 17 (2): 174-190.
  4. Clemes, M.D., Gan, C.E.C. ve Kao, T. (2007). “University Student Satisfaction: An Emprical Analysis”, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 17 (2): 292-325.
  5. Firdaus, A. (2006). “Measuring Service Quality in Higher Education: Three Instruments Compared”, International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 29 (1): 71-89.
  6. Ham, C.L. (2003). “Analyzing the Value of Service Quality Management: Gaining Competitive Advantage”, International Journal of Value- Based Management, 16 (2), 131-152.
  7. Hill, F.M. (1995). “Managing Service Quality in Higher Education: The Role of Student As Primary Consumer”, Journal of Quality Assurance in Education, 3 (3): 10-21.
  8. Kotler, P., J. Bowen, J. Makens. (1999). Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism. Second. Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Lovelock, C. (1996). Services Marketing. Third. Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International Editions. Lovelock, C. ve J. Wirtz. (2011). Services Marketing. 7th. Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. Markovic, S., Gospodarstvo, N. (2006). “Expected service quality measurement in tourism higher education”, NG, 52, 1/2, 86-95.
  9. McElwee, G., Redman, T. (1993). “Upward Appraisal in Practice: An Illustrative Example Using the Qualed Model”, Journal of Education & Training, 35 (2): 27-31.
  10. Narasimhan, K. (1997). “Improving Teaching and Learning: Perception Minus Expectations Gap Analysis Approach”, Training for Quality, 5: 121-125.
  11. Ong, W.M., Nankervis, A. (2012). “Service Quality in Higher Education: Students’ Perceptions in Australia and Malaysia”, Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research, 1 (1): 277-290.
  12. Owlia, M.S. ve Aspinwall, E.M. (1996). “A Framework for the Dimensions of Quality in Higher Education”, Journal of Quality Assurance in Education, 4 (2): 12-20.
  13. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L. (1988). “Servqual: A Multiple Item