Journals / Bilge Strateji / 2016 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 14

Big Business Influence on European Union Decision-Making: The Case of the European Round Table of Industrialists

Pages
127–149
Publication Date
2016-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to directly influencing the EU on these issues, the European Round Table of Industrialists also tried to influence EU decision-making by asking EU po- litical actors to accelerate the accession of Central and Eastern European Countries, restructure European higher education and sign the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with the United States.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are currently nearly 30,000 lobbyists in Brussels, of which two-thirds work for business interests, with representatives of multinationals and big business groups hav- ing the most influence on decision-making in the European Union.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article ex- plores the influence of the European Round Table of Industrialists, a leading European business group of 50 chief executives and chairmen of Europe’s major multinationals, to EU decision-making in line with its members’ interests.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to directly influencing the EU on these issues, the European Round Table of Industrialists also tried to influence EU decision-making by asking EU po- litical actors to accelerate the accession of Central and Eastern European Countries, restructure European higher education and sign the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with the United States.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:European Round Table of Industrialists · European Union · Lobbying

Özet

There are currently nearly 30,000 lobbyists in Brussels, of which two-thirds work for business interests, with representatives of multinationals and big business groups hav- ing the most influence on decision-making in the European Union. This article ex- plores the influence of the European Round Table of Industrialists, a leading European business group of 50 chief executives and chairmen of Europe’s major multinationals, to EU decision-making in line with its members’ interests. It is argued in the article that the European Round Table of Industrialists acted as an agenda-setter and policy- maker of the Single European Act and Trans-European Networks, and promoted the incorporation of the stages of the Economic and Monetary Union into the Maastricht Treaty through helping the European Commission in its struggle to convince member states. In addition to directly influencing the EU on these issues, the European Round Table of Industrialists also tried to influence EU decision-making by asking EU po- litical actors to accelerate the accession of Central and Eastern European Countries, restructure European higher education and sign the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with the United States.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, U. B. (2016). Big Business Influence on European Union Decision-Making: The Case of the European Round Table of Industrialists. Bilge Strateji, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 14, 127–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/713752

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akman, Said, “AB-ABD Transatlantik Ticaret ve Yatırım Ortaklığı (TTIP) ve Türkiye”, TEPAV, 2013, http://www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/1371828341-5. AB___ABD_Transatlantik_Ticaret_ve_Yatirim_Ortakligi__TTIP__ve_Tur- kiye.pdf (accessed: July 25, 2014).
  2. Apeldoorn, Bastiaan Van, “Transnational Class Agency and European Gover- nance: The Case of the European Round Table of Industrialists”, New Politi- cal Economy 5, No.2 (2000): 157-181.
  3. Arabacı, Ahmet, “Avrupa Birliği’nde Çıkar Temsilinin Gelişimi”, Uluslara- rası İlişkiler Dergisi 5, No.17 (2008): 73-103. Ariés, Quantin and Burchard, Hans Von Der, “TTIP Negotiations not even Half Done”, Politico, September 30, 2015, http://www.politico.eu/article/ttip- negotiations-not-even-half-done/ (accessed: November 19, 2015). Association for the Monetary Union of Europe, “Taking Stock of 9 Years of Euro Conferences”, AMUE Newsletter, No. 38, January/ February 1999.
  4. Bache, Ian, George, Stephen, and Bulmer, Simon, Politics in the European Union, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Balanyá, Belén et al., Europe Inc.: Regional and Global Restructuring and the Rise of Corporate Power, London: Pluto Press, 2003.
  5. Bouwen, Peter, “Corporate Lobbying in the European Union: The Logic of Accesss”, Journal of European Public Policy 9, No.3 (2002): 365-390. BUSINESSEUROPE, “Business Alliance for TTIP Organises Welcome Re- ception for EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström”, February 2, 2015, https://www.businesseurope.eu/news/commissioner-malmstrom-together-we- will-make-ttip-happen (accessed: November 23, 2015). BUSINESSEUROPE, “European Business United in Strong Support for TTIP”, May 15, 2014, https://www.businesseurope.eu/sites/buseur/files/me- dia/imported/2014-00534-E.pdf (accessed: November 23, 2015). Center for Responsive Politics, “Top Spenders, 2014”, https://www.opensec- rets.org/lobby/top.php?showYear=2014&indexType=s (accessed: October 22, 2015). Corporate Europe Observatory, “Brussels: The EU Quarter”, September 2011, http://corporateeurope.org/sites/default/files/publications/ceolobbylow. pdf (accessed: October 20, 2015).
  6. Cowles, Maria Green, “Setting the Agenda for a New Europe: The ERT and EC 1992”, Journal of Common Market Studies 33, No. 4 (1995): 501-526.
  7. Dinçer, Müjde Ker, Lobiler, İzmir: Alfa Yayınları, 1999.
  8. Drutman, Lee, “How Corporate Lobbyists Conquered American Dip- lomacy”, The Atlantic, April 20, 2015, http://www.theatlantic.com/ business/archive/2015/04/how-corporate-lobbyists-conquered-