Journals / Bilge Strateji / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 22

A Constructivist Perspective: Russia’s Politics on Ukraine and Annexation of Crimea (2014)

Pages
53–88
Publication Date
2021-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The case of Crimea is closely linked to Russia›s common history and culture with Ukraine, and the country›s mental codes, basic identity features that have existed for centuries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, Russia’s relationship with Ukraine in terms of the annexation of Crimea is discussed using the Constructivist paradigm, which considers identity as the main motivation of states› behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since Russia›s annexation of Crimea is due to the deterioration of Russia›s relations with Ukraine and Ukraine›s rapprochement with Western alliances, Russia›s relations with Ukraine were included in the study, and the annexation of Crimea is tried to be explained depending on these relations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The case of Crimea is closely linked to Russia›s common history and culture with Ukraine, and the country›s mental codes, basic identity features that have existed for centuries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Russia · Constructivism · the annexation of Crimea

Abstract

In the study, Russia’s relationship with Ukraine in terms of the annexation of Crimea is discussed using the Constructivist paradigm, which considers identity as the main motivation of states› behavior. Since Russia›s annexation of Crimea is due to the deterioration of Russia›s relations with Ukraine and Ukraine›s rapprochement with Western alliances, Russia›s relations with Ukraine were included in the study, and the annexation of Crimea is tried to be explained depending on these relations. On the issue of annexation, Russia strives not to be harmed its interests, which are based on its identity and tries to construct norms and create an appropriate discourse by emphasizing that Russia acts in accordance with international law. The case of Crimea is closely linked to Russia›s common history and culture with Ukraine, and the country›s mental codes, basic identity features that have existed for centuries.

Özet

In the study, Russia’s relationship with Ukraine in terms of the annexation of Crimea is discussed using the Constructivist paradigm, which considers identity as the main motivation of states› behavior. Since Russia›s annexation of Crimea is due to the deterioration of Russia›s relations with Ukraine and Ukraine›s rapprochement with Western alliances, Russia›s relations with Ukraine were included in the study, and the annexation of Crimea is tried to be explained depending on these relations. On the issue of annexation, Russia strives not to be harmed its interests, which are based on its identity and tries to construct norms and create an appropriate discourse by emphasizing that Russia acts in accordance with international law. The case of Crimea is closely linked to Russia›s common history and culture with Ukraine, and the country›s mental codes, basic identity features that have existed for centuries.

🔖

Cite This Article

KETENCİ, A., NAS, Ç. (2021). A Constructivist Perspective: Russia’s Politics on Ukraine and Annexation of Crimea (2014). Bilge Strateji, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 22, 53–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/713733

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Adrian Karatnycky, “Ukraine’s Orange Revolution”, Council on Foreign Relations, Foreign Affairs, vol. 84, no. 2 (2005).
  2. Alexander Wendt, The Return of Culture and Identity in Theory “Identitiy and Structural Change in International Politics”, Ed. Yosef Lapid, (London:1996) Alexei Moiseev, “Concerning Certain Positions on the Ukrainian Issue in International Law,” Russian Politics & Law, Routledge Press, vol. 53, no. 2 (2015) Anar Somuncuoğlu, “Roma Katolik Kilisesi ve Fener Rum Patrikhanesi’nin Eski Sovyet Alanındaki Faaliyetleri” ASAM Press,
  3. Stratejik Analiz, ASAM Press, vol. 3, no. 28 (Ankara: 2002)
  4. Anar Somuncuoğlu, Rus Ortodoks Kilisesinin Eski Sovyet Alanındaki Misyonu, Karadeniz Araştırmaları, no. 2 (Summer, 2004) http://www.karam.org.tr/Makaleler/992132737_somuncuo- glu.pdf Anna Dolya, “The Annexation of Crimea: Lessons for European Se- curity”, European Isuuses, Fondation Robert Schuman Policy Pa- per, no 382, (23 February 2016 ) Anton Bebler, “Criemea and the Russian- Ukranian Confilict”, Ro- manian Journal of European Affairs, vol 15, No 1, (2015) Dalaklis Dimitrios, “The Geopolitical Dimensions of Ukranian Cri- sis”, 2015. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282007294_The_Geopo- litical_Dimensions_of_the_Ukrainian_Crisis Dana Tandilasvili, “Classical Realist and Norm Based Constrac- tivist Analysis of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine and Annexation of Criema”, Towson University Journal of International Affairs, vol. XLIX, no. 1, (Fall, 2015) https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/wp.towson.edu/dist/b/55/ files/2016/06/SPRING16FALL15ISSUEpt2-1jhiif4.pdf Dimitri Trenin, Russia’s Changing Identitiy: In Search of A Role in the 21st Century, Carnegie Moscow Centre, 18.07.2019, https:// carnegie.ru/commentary/79521 Emanuel Adler, “Constuctivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions, and Debates”, Handbook of International Rela- tions, 2. Ed., Ed by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, Beth A. Simmons Gwendolyn Sasse, The Crimea Question: Identity, Transition, and Conflict, Ukranian Research Instıtute Harvard University, (Cambridge, Maassachusettes: 2007) Henry Kissenger, “To Settle the Ukranie Crisis Start at the End”, The Washington Post, 5.3.2014, https://www.washingtonpost.com/ opinions/henry-kissinger-to-settle-the-ukraine-crisis-start-at-the- end/2014/03/05/46dad868-a496-11e3-8466-d34c451760b9_story. html?utm_term=.65ddae2c9212 Ian Hurd, “Constructivism”, International Relations, The Oxford Handbook, ed. Christian Reus- Smit, Duncan Snidal, O