SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

An Evaluation of School-Based Budgeting (SBB) Implementation from the Standpoint of School Development Function

Okul Bazlı Bütçeleme (OBB) Uygulamasının Okul Geliştirme İşlevi Açısından Değerlendirilmesi

Betül BALKAR
Rabia ÖZTUZCU-KÜÇÜKBERE
Şahabettin AKŞAB
Pages
727–756
Publication Date
2019-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was also concluded that SBB should be structured in accordance with social, economic and cultural conditions of school and school environment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It was aimed to determine the opinions of school administrators on the implementation of School-Based Budgeting (SBB) and the contributions of SBB to school development in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consisted of 29 primary and secondary school administrators.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was also concluded that SBB should be structured in accordance with social, economic and cultural conditions of school and school environment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:okul bazlı bütçeleme · okul geliştirme · ilkokul yöneticileri

Abstract

It was aimed to determine the opinions of school administrators on the implementation of School-Based Budgeting (SBB) and the contributions of SBB to school development in this study. The qualitative methods were used in this descriptive study. The study group consisted of 29 primary and secondary school administrators. After data of the study were obtained through semi structured interviews and focus group interviews. School administrators’ opinions on authority and responsibilities of school management within SBB, usage of Ministry of National Education Information Systems fund monitoring module, setting school budget, contributions of SBB to school development and recommendations for improvement of SBB were analyzed through content analysis. The results of this study revealed that SBB implementation can serve for developing schools multidimensionally as a school development tool. It was also concluded that SBB should be structured in accordance with social, economic and cultural conditions of school and school environment. Based on the findings of the study, it is suggested that SBB can be performed differently depending on different needs of each school in an attempt to use it as a school development tool completely.

Özet

Bu araştırmada; okul yöneticilerinin Okul Bazlı Bütçeleme (OBB) uygulamasına ve OBB’nin okul gelişimine nasıl katkı sağlayabileceğine ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Nitel araştırma yöntem ve tekniklerinin kullanıldığı araştırma, betimleyici yaklaşımla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu, Gaziantep ilinde görev yapan 29 ilkokul ve ortaokul yöneticisinden oluşmaktadır. Araştırma verileri, yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ve odak grup görüşmeleri aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, içerik analizi ile çözümlenmiştir. İçerik analizi sürecinde okul yöneticilerinin; OBB sürecinde okul yönetiminin yetki ve sorumlulukları, Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Bilişim Sistemleri ödenek takip modülünün kullanımı, okul bütçesi oluşturulması ve OBB’nin okul gelişimine katkıları ile ilgili görüşleri ve OBB’nin geliştirilmesine yönelik önerileri analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonucunda, OBB uygulamasının okul geliştirme aracı olarak okulların çok boyutlu geliştirilmesine hizmet edebileceği ortaya çıkmıştır. Aynı zamanda, OBB kapsamında sosyal, ekonomik ve kültürel açıdan okulun ve okul çevresinin şartlarına uygun bir yapılanma sürecine gidilmesi gerektiği sonucuna varılmıştır. Araştırmanın bulgularına dayalı olarak, OBB’nin tam anlamıyla bir okul geliştirme aracı olarak kullanılabilmesi için okulların ihtiyaçlarına bağlı olarak farklılaştırılmış biçimlerde uygulanması önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALKAR, B., ÖZTUZCU-KÜÇÜKBERE, R., AKŞAB, Ş. (2019). An Evaluation of School-Based Budgeting (SBB) Implementation from the Standpoint of School Development Function. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 727–756. https://ajindex.com/articles/71355

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Anthony, R., & Young, D. (2007). Management control in nonprofit organizations (7th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill. Baines, W. (2007). Common ground across the divide: Financial management policies of schools in contrasting public education systems. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Conference for Accounting and Finance Association, Australia and New Zealand, (AFAANZ), Queensland, Australia. Barrera-Osorio, F., Fasih, T., & Patrinos, H. A. (2009). Decentralized decision making in schools: The theory and evidence on school-based management. Washington, DC: World Bank. Briggs, K. L., & Wohlstetter, P. (2003). Key elements of a successful school-based management strategy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 351–372.
  2. Caldwell, B. J., & Spinks, J. M. (2005). The self-managing school. UK: The Falmer Press.
  3. Chan, L. (1997). School-based budgeting: A cost-benefit model. Reports - Evaluative. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED422628
  4. Chen, C. C. (2002). A study on relationship between school-based management and school effectiveness in elementary and junior high schools (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Hualien University of Education, Hualien, Taiwan. Cheng, C. L. (2006). The feasibility of school-based finance management in junior high schools, under condition of educational adequacy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Cheung, S. M. C., & Kan, F. L. F. (2009). Teachers’ perceptions of incorporated management committees as a form of school-based management in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(2), 139-148.
  5. Clarke, S. (2002). Understanding small school leadership: Listening to the practitioners. Practicing Administrator, 24(3), 28–29.
  6. Clover, M. W., Jones, E. B., Bailey, W., & Griffin, B. (2004). Budget priorities of selected principals: Reallocation of state funds. NASSP Bulletin, 88(640), 69-82.
  7. Cranston, N. (2000). The impact of school–based management on primary school principals: An Australian perspective. Journal of School Leadership, 10(3), 214-232.
  8. Creswell, J.W. (2002). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. DeGrow, B. (2015) Colorado student-based budgeting on the rise. Independence Institute. Retrieved from https://www.i2i.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/IP-2-2015-2.pdf.
  9. Fermanich, M., Odden, A., & Archibald, S. (2000). A case study of d