SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Adaptation of the Delaware Social-Emotional Competency (DSECS-S) Scale into Turkish Language

Delaware Sosyal-Duygusal Yeterlik Ölçeğinin (DSDY-Ö) Türk Diline Uyarlanması

Bijen FİLİZ
Mehmet DURNALI
Pages
962–977
Publication Date
2019-07-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The scale is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in Turkish culture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to adapt The Delaware Social-Emotional Competency Scale into Turkish language so that social-emotional competency of students can be examined through testing the language validity and conducting Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:While the sample for EFA consisted of 338, the sample for CFA consisted of 220 different high school students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The scale is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in Turkish culture.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:sosyal-duygusal yeterlik · geçerlik · güvenirlik

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt The Delaware Social-Emotional Competency Scale into Turkish language so that social-emotional competency of students can be examined through testing the language validity and conducting Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). While the sample for EFA consisted of 338, the sample for CFA consisted of 220 different high school students. Since the CFA was administered first and it was decided to administer the EFA. The first and 12nd items were taken out of the scale considering the total item correlation before EFA. Two sub-dimensional structures were obtained as a result of the AFA administered with the remaining items. Sub-dimensions were given the names “self awareness” and “social awareness” in accordance with the literature. In order to test the structure obtained from the EFA, CFA was administered with different data sets and the factor structure was determined to be acceptable. The internal consistency coefficient for the reliability study was calculated as .70 The Pearson Moments Multiplication Correlation Coefficient calculated for the test-retest reliability study was found to be significant. The scale is a valid and reliable tool that can be used in Turkish culture.

Özet

Bu çalışmada öğrencilerin sosyal-duygusal yeterliklerini değerlendirebilmek amacıyla Mantz ve ark. tarafından geliştirilen “Delaware Sosyal-Duygusal Yeterlik Ölçeği”nin Türk diline uyarlaması yapılmıştır. Çalışmada ölçeğin dil eşdeğerliğinin sağlanması ve faktör yapısının sınanması hedeflenmiştir. Ölçek, açımlayıcı faktör analizi (AFA) için 338 lise öğrencisi, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) için farklı 220 lise öğrencisine uygulanmıştır. DFA analizi sonucunda bazı maddelerin .05 düzeyinde anlamli olmadiği tespit edilmiş ve AFA yapılmasına karar verilmiştir. AFA öncesi toplam madde korelasyonuna bakılarak 1 ve 12. maddeler ölçekten çıkarılmıştır. Kalan maddelerle yapılan AFA sonucunda iki alt boyutlu bir yapı elde edilmiştir. Alt boyutlara literature uygun olarak “öz farkındalık” ve “sosyal farkındalık” isimleri verilmiştir. AFA’dan elde edilen yapının test edilmesi için farklı veri grubuyla DFA yapılmış ve faktör yapısının kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Güvenirlik çalışması için iç tutarlık katsayısı .70 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Test–tekrar test güvenirlik çalışması için hesaplanan Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon katsayısının anlamlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçek, Türk Kültüründe kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir araçtır.

🔖

Cite This Article

FİLİZ, B., DURNALI, M. (2019). Adaptation of the Delaware Social-Emotional Competency (DSECS-S) Scale into Turkish Language. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 962–977. https://ajindex.com/articles/71333

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Aygun, H. E., & Taskin, C. S. (2017). Identifying psychometric properties of the social-emotional learning skills scale. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 12(2), 43-61.Alpar, R. (1998). İstatistik ve spor bilimleri. Ankara:
  2. Bağırgan.Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological testing. New York: Mac Millan Publishing Co. Inc.Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397-438.Bear, G., Yang, C., Harris, A.,Mantz, L., Hearn, S., & Boyer, D. (2016). Technical manual for 2016 Delaware school survey: Scales of school climate; bullying victimization; student engagement; positive, punitive, and social emotional learning techniques; and the Delaware social and emotional competencies scale. Newark, DE: Center for Disabilities Studies.Bornstein, M. H., Hahn, C.-S., & Haynes, O. M. (2010). Social competence, externalizing, and internalizing behavioral adjustment from early childhood through early adolescence: Developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 717–735. doi:10.1017/ S0954579410000416.Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O’Brennan, L. M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: Perceptual differences between students and school staff. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 361–382.Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi.Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group.Ciotto, C.M., & Gagnon, A.G. (2018) Promoting social and emotional learning in physical education, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 89(4), 27-33. DOI: 10.1080/07303084.2018.1430625Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2012). 2013 CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs. Preschool and elementary school edition. Chicago, IL: CASELCollaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2017). SEL FAQ. Retrieved from http://www.casel.org/faqs/
  4. Coryn, C. L. S., Spybrook, J. K., Evergreen, S. D. H., & Blinkiewicz, M. V. (2009). Development and evaluation of the social-emotional learning scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 283-295.Dusenbury, L., Weissberg, R. P., Goren, P., & Domitrovich, C. (2014). State standards to advance social and emotional learning: Findings from CA