Journals / Anatomy / 2014 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Conus arteriosus: an anatomic and terminologic evaluation

Journal
Anatomy
Pages
40–44
Publication Date
2015-06-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This point is of importance for instructors and students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomy and terminology for the conus arteriosus, thereby revealing possible differences among various sources of this information.Methods: Twenty-four textbooks, nine anatomy atlases, and six original articles related to terminology were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The term “conus arteriosus,” first used in Terminologia Anatomica, published in 1998, was also evaluated.Results: Conus arteriosus is a part of the right ventricle (ventriculus dexter).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This point is of importance for instructors and students.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:conus arteriosus · infundibulum · right ventricle

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomy and terminology for the conus arteriosus, thereby revealing possible differences among various sources of this information.Methods: Twenty-four textbooks, nine anatomy atlases, and six original articles related to terminology were examined. The term “conus arteriosus,” first used in Terminologia Anatomica, published in 1998, was also evaluated.Results: Conus arteriosus is a part of the right ventricle (ventriculus dexter). Physicians refer to this structure as the ‘infundibulum’. Taking into account the three-dimensional aspect of the right ventricle, its outer surface is considered to be the conus arteriosus. This structure is supplied by branches of the right and left coronary arteries which are called the conus arteries. Thus, utilization of the term “conus artery” supports the aforementioned suggestion.Conclusion: In case the term “conus arteriosus” falls out of preference for this structure as a whole, the nomenclature used for this structure in anatomy atlases must be corrected. This point is of importance for instructors and students.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAÇAR, D., BARUT, Ç. (2015). Conus arteriosus: an anatomic and terminologic evaluation. Anatomy, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 40–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/712446

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Mesut R. Kardiyovasküler anatomi. In: Duran E, ed. Kalp ve damar cerrahisi. 1. baskı. ‹stanbul: Çapa Tıp Kitabevi; 2004. p. 37–41. Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology (FCAT). Terminologia Anatomica. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1998.
  2. Kaçar D, Barut Ç. Veins of the heart: an evaluation of the terminol- ogy. Türk Gö¤üs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi 2011;19:529–32.
  3. Wilcox BR, Cook AC, Anderson RH. Kalbin cerrahi anatomisi. [Çev. Ed. Oran B]. 3. Baskı. Ankara: Günefl Tıp Kitabevleri; 2010. p. 14–129. Kulkarni NV. Clinical anatomy (A Problem Solving Approach). 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brother Medical Publishers; 2012. p. 238–57.
  4. Wilcox BR, Anderson RH. Surgical anatomy of the heart. In: Baue AE, ed. Glenn’s thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Vol 2. 6th ed. Stanford, Connecticut: Appleton and Lange; 1995. p. 1544–45.
  5. Cook AC, Wilcox BR, Anderson RH. Surgical anatomy of the heart. In: Sellke FW, ed. Sabiston and Spencer’s surgery of the chest. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2010. p. 697–710.
  6. Malouf JF, Edwards WD, Tajik AJ, Seward JB. Functional anato- my of the heart. In: Fuster V, Alexander RW, O’Rourke RA, eds. Hurst’s the heart. 11th ed. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill; 2004. p. 65–7.
  7. Arıncı K, Elhan A. Anatomi. Cilt 2. 4. baskı. Ankara: Günefl Kitabevi; 2006. p. 6. Zeren Z. Anatomi. ‹stanbul: Filiz Kitabevi; 1966. p. 196. Odar ‹V. Anatomi. Cilt 2. 7. baskı. Ankara: Hacettepe Kitapçılık; 1986. p. 403–4.
  8. Popma JJ, Bittl J. Coronary angiography and intravascular ultra- sonography. In: Braunwald, Zipes DP, Libby P, eds. Heart disease. 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1988. p. 399–400.
  9. Kachlik D, Baca V, Bozdechova I, Cech P, Musil V. Anatomical terminology and nomenclature: past, present and highlights. Surg Radiol Anat 2008;30:459–66.
  10. Message MA, Anderson RH. Towards a new terminology for clin- ical anatomy, with special reference to the heart. Clin Anat 1996; 9:317–29.
  11. Anderson RH, Brown NA. The anatomy of the heart revisited. Anat Rec 1996;246:1–7.
  12. Watler DC, Wynter L. Cor triventriculare: infundibular stenosis with subdivision of the right ventricle. Br Heart J 1961;23: 599–602.
  13. McKinley M, O’Loughlin VD. Human anatomy. 2nd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2008. p. 632–3.
  14. Drake RL, Vogl W, Mitchell AWM. Dorland’s/Gray’s Anatomi Cep Atlası.[Çev. Ed. ‹lgi S]. Ankara: Günefl Kitabevi; 2010. p. 100–101.
  15. Sancak B, Cumhur M. Fonksiyonel anatomi: Bafl-boyun ve iç organlar. 3. baskı. Ankara: ODTÜ Yayıncılık; 2004. p. 146. Moore KL, Dalley AF. Klini¤e yönelik anatomi. [Çe