✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
Corrected version is as follows: Özkan G1, Akkoç RF1, Demirdafl K2, Artaş G3, Ögetürk M1.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Author names for abstract of poster presentation published in Volume 10, Supplement 2, September 2016, page 178 – P-135 “Double enamel pearl whit buds: a case report” is erroneously published as: Özkan G1, Akkoç RF1, Demirdaş K2,Ögetürk M1.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Author names for abstract of poster presentation published in Volume 10, Supplement 2, September 2016, page 178 – P-135 “Double enamel pearl whit buds: a case report” is erroneously published as: Özkan G1, Akkoç RF1, Demirdaş K2,Ögetürk M1.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Corrected version is as follows: Özkan G1, Akkoç RF1, Demirdafl K2, Artaş G3, Ögetürk M1.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:enamel pearl · molar · tooth
Abstract
Author names for abstract of poster presentation published in Volume 10, Supplement 2, September 2016, page 178 – P-135 “Double enamel pearl whit buds: a case report” is erroneously published as: Özkan G1, Akkoç RF1, Demirdaş K2,Ögetürk M1. Corrected version is as follows: Özkan G1, Akkoç RF1, Demirdafl K2, Artaş G3, Ögetürk M1.
Keywords
🔖
Cite This Article
ÖZKAN, G., AKKOÇ, R., DEMİRDAŞ, K., ARTAŞ, G., ÖGETÜRK, M. (2016). Correction: (P-135) Double enamel pearl whit buds: a case report. Anatomy, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 246–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/712403