Journals / Anatomy / 2019 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Radiological hip indices correlate with GMFCS level I and GMFM-66 scores in cerebral palsy

Journal
Anatomy
Pages
13–20
Publication Date
2019-04-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Evaluating the functional levels of patients according to GMFM-66 scores with radiographic parameters is believed to contribute to the monitoring CP children.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the certain radiological hip parameters and the effects of these parameters on the functional capacity of cerebral palsy (CP) children, to compare the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66 scores) of hemiparetic and diparetic children with spastic CP in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level 1, and to define possible differences or similarities with the control group.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The functional capacity of the CP group was assessed by GMFM-66.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Evaluating the functional levels of patients according to GMFM-66 scores with radiographic parameters is believed to contribute to the monitoring CP children.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:cerebral palsy · functional capacity · gross motor functional classification system

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the certain radiological hip parameters and the effects of these parameters on the functional capacity of cerebral palsy (CP) children, to compare the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66 scores) of hemiparetic and diparetic children with spastic CP in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level 1, and to define possible differences or similarities with the control group. Methods: The radiographic parameters measured for CP and control groups were caput-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD), migration index (MI), center edge angle (CEA), acetabular index (AI) and pelvic obliquity. The functional capacity of the CP group was assessed by GMFM-66. Results: No significant differences were found in terms of sides of the same individual in each group. Significant differences were found between groups for left CCD, right MI, right and left AI, and right and left CEA. Correlation analyses revealed significant relationships between radiological parameters. Hemiparetics had statistically higher GMFM-66 dimension E score than diparetics. Conclusion: The threshold values for hip parameters were determined with CP in GMFCS level 1. The hemiparetic and diparetic children with CP, who were at the GMFCS level I and age group, had similar hip morphology. Development of femoral head and acetabulum in these children were not different from control group. Evaluating the functional levels of patients according to GMFM-66 scores with radiographic parameters is believed to contribute to the monitoring CP children.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELVAN, Ö., KESKİNBORA, M., ÇELİKCAN, H. D., BOBUŞ, A., ÖZGÜR, A., KÖMÜR, M., OLGUNUS, Z. K. (2019). Radiological hip indices correlate with GMFCS level I and GMFM-66 scores in cerebral palsy. Anatomy, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 13–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/712378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Martins E, Cordovil R, Oliveira R, Letras S, Lourenço S, Pereira I, Ferro A, Lopes I, Silva CR, Marques M. Efficacy of suit therapy on functioning in children and adolescentswith cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol 2016;58:348– 60
  2. Damiano D, Abel M, Romness M, Oeffinger D, Tylkowski C, Gorton G, Bagley A, Nicholson D, Barnes D, Calmes J, Kryscio R, Rogers. Comparing functional profiles of children with hemiplegic and diplegic cerebral palsy in GMFCS Levels I and II: are separate classifications needed? Dev Med Child Neurol 2006;48:797–803
  3. Oeffinger DJ, Rogers SP, Bagley A, Gorton G, Tylkowski CM. Clinical applications of outcome tools in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2009;20:549–65
  4. Soo B, Howard JJ, Boyd RN. Hip displacement in cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:121–9
  5. Hägglund G, Lauge-Pedersen H, Wagner P. Characteristics of children with hip displacement in cerebral palsy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007;26:101
  6. Morrell DS, Pearson JM, Sauser DD. Progressive bone and joint abnormalities of the spine and lower extremities in cerebral palsy. Radiographics 2002;22:257–68
  7. Palisano R, Hanna SE, Rosenbaum P, Russell D, Walter SD, Wood EP, Galuppi BE. Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther 2000;80:974–85
  8. Cobanoglu M, Cullu E, Omurlu I. The effect of hip reconstruction on gross motor function levels in children with cerebral palsy. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2018;52:44–8
  9. Hägglund G, Andersson S, Düppe H, Lauge-Pedersen H, Nordmark E, Westbom LJ. Prevention of dislocation of the hip in children with cerebral palsy. The first ten years of a population-based prevention programme. Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:95–101
  10. Dobson F, Boyd RN, Parrott J, Nattrass GR, Graham HK. Hip surveillance in children with cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:720–6
  11. Wood E, Rosenbaum P. The Gross Motor Function Classification System for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000;42:292–6
  12. Terjesen T. Development of the hip joints in unoperated children with cerebral palsy. Acta Orthopaedica 2006;77:125–31
  13. Scrutton D, Baird G. Surveillance measures of the hips of children with bilateral cerebral palsy. Arch Dis Child 1997;76:381–4
  14. Rethlefsen SA, Ryan DD, Kay RM. Classification systems in cerebral palsy. Orthop Clin North Am 2010;41:457–67