SavedAdd your journal

Journals / FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 /

Rorty’s Liberal Democratic Society and a Postmodern Utopia Based on Cruelty

RORTY’NİN LİBERAL DEMOKRATİK TOPLUMU VE ZULÜM ÜZERİNDEN TEMELLENDİRİLEN POSTMODERN BİR ÜTOPYA

Deniz KUNDAKÇI
Pages
43–64
Publication Date
2012-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study not only explores the scope and significance of Rorty’s account of democratic promise which is grounded fundamentally on cruelty, but it also tries to bring to the fore the role of philosophy in this promise

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As one of the most creative thinkers of our age, Rorty takes issues with the established ways of discussing the political activity and suggests a contemporary view of “utopia” in a manner precisely the reverse of traditional debates over the concept of utopia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Inasmuch as his novel conception of utopia is concerned, he puts aside all the existing definitions and rather than answering the question “what are we?”out-there, he raises the question “what might we try to become?”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study not only explores the scope and significance of Rorty’s account of democratic promise which is grounded fundamentally on cruelty, but it also tries to bring to the fore the role of philosophy in this promise
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Rorty · Postmodernist Burjuva Liberalizmi · Estetik

Abstract

As one of the most creative thinkers of our age, Rorty takes issues with the established ways of discussing the political activity and suggests a contemporary view of “utopia” in a manner precisely the reverse of traditional debates over the concept of utopia. Inasmuch as his novel conception of utopia is concerned, he puts aside all the existing definitions and rather than answering the question “what are we?”out-there, he raises the question “what might we try to become?”. His attempt consists in making a democratic promise to create a Future which is more beautiful than the Past. This study not only explores the scope and significance of Rorty’s account of democratic promise which is grounded fundamentally on cruelty, but it also tries to bring to the fore the role of philosophy in this promise

Özet

Çağımızın en yaratıcı düşünürlerinden birisi olarak Rorty, geleneksel düşünme yolları ve politik etkinlikten farklı çağdaş bir ütopya önerir. Bu ütopya bağlamında, mevcut bütün tanımlamaları bir yana bırakır ve “biz neyiz?” sorusunun cevabını orada-dışarıda bulmanın peşine düşmek yerine; “biz ne olmayı deneyebiliriz sorusunu sorar. Onun çabası sadece, geleceği geçmişten daha güzel yapabilmek için demokratik bir vaatte bulunmaktır. Bu çalışma bir yandan özellikle Rorty’nin zulüm üzerinden temellenen demokrasi vaadi ve onun mahiyetini sorgulamaya çalışırken; diğer taraftan da felsefenin bu vaatteki yerini anlamaya yönelik çaba sarfeder

🔖

Cite This Article

KUNDAKÇI, D. (2012). Rorty’s Liberal Democratic Society and a Postmodern Utopia Based on Cruelty. FLSF Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 43–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/71136

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. BERNSTEİN, Richard J. (2003). “Rorty’s Inspirational Liberalism”, Richard Rorty içinde, Cambirdge University Press,
  2. Edited by Charles Guignon, David R. Hiley, Cambridge, 124-138.
  3. Bacon, Michael. (2010).
  4. Richard Rorty, Pragmatizm ve Politik Liberalizm. Elips Kitap, Çeviren: Banu Özdemir, Ankara.
  5. ELSHTAİN, Jean Bethke. (2003). “Don’t Be Cruel: Reflections on Rortyian Liberalism”, Richard Rorty içinde, Cambirdge University Press,
  6. Edited by Charles Guignon, David R. Hiley, Cambridge,139-157.
  7. LYOTARD, Jean-François. (2001). “Note on the Meaning of the Word “Post” and Answering the Question -What is the Postmodernism-” Continental Aesthetics: Romanticism to Postmodernism: An Anthology (Blackwell Philosophy Anthologies) içinde, Kearney, Richard, Rasmussen, David. (Ed.), USA, s. 363-370.
  8. MOUFFE, Chantal. (1998). (Ed.) Yapıbozum ve Pragmatizm. Sarmal Yayınevi, Çeviren: Tuncay Birkan, İstanbul.
  9. NİELSEN, Kai. (2006). “Richard Rorty”, A Companion to Pragmatism içinde, Edited by John R. Shook, Joseph Margolis, Blackwell Publishing, 127- 137. RORTY, Richard. (1994). “Ethics Without Principles”, Philosophy and Social Hope içinde, Penguin Books (first published 1999), England, 72-90.
  10. RORTY, Richard. (1994). “Pragmatism, Relativism, Irranionalism”, Consequences of Pragmatism (Essays: 1972-1980) içinde. University of Minnesota Press (first published 1994), Minneapolis, 160-175.
  11. RORTY, Richard. (1995).
  12. Olumsallık, İroni ve Dayanışma. Ayrıntı Yayınları, İngilizceden Çevirenler: Mehmet Küçük-Alev Türker, İstanbul.
  13. RORTY, Richard. (1995). “Philosophy & Future”, Rorty&Pragmatism, The Philosopher Responds to His Critics içinde, Edited by HermanJ. Saatkamp, Jr., Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville & London, 197-205.
  14. RORTY, Richard. (1997). “Justice as a Larger Loyalty”, Ethical Perspectives 4, (1997), 2, 139-151.
  15. RORTY, Richard. (2002). “Postmodern Burjuva Liberalizmi”, Post Modernist Burjuva Liberalizmi içinde, Doruk Yayınları, Çeviren: Yavuz Alogan, Ankara, 71-80.
  16. RORTY, Richard. (2006). “Pragmatism as Anti-authoritarianism”, A Companion to Pragmatism içinde, Edited by John R. Shook, Joseph Margolis, Blackwell Publishing, 257-266.
  17. RORTY, Richard. (2008). “Demokrasi ve Felsefe”, Cogito 54, Çeviren: Şeyda Öztürk. SHUSTERMAN, Richard. (2000). “Postmodern Ethics and The Art of Living”, Pragmatist Aesthetics, Living, Beauty, Rethinking Art içinde, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 236-261.
  18. SHUSTERMAN, Richard. (2001). “Pragmatism-Dewey”, The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics içinde