SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yeni Üroloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Use of Flexible Cystoscope in Removal of Stone in Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Pyelolithotomy

Laparoskopik Pyeloplasti Ve Pyelolitotomi Operasyonlarında Taş Çıkarılmasında Fleksible Sistoskop Kullanımı

Alper BİTKİN
Mustafa AYDİN
Ebubekir AKGUNES
Mevlut KELES
Mustafa Kemal ATİLLA
Lokman IRKİLATA
Pages
43–48
Publication Date
2019-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.Conclusion: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty and pyelolithotomy, with simultaneous use of flexible cystoscopy in UPJ obstruction patients with kidney stones and patients with multiple renal stones is a feasible treatment option, with a high success rate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy are widely used in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstructions and renal stones in the urology field.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study assessed the usefulness of these surgical procedures .Material and Methods: Between February 2016 and October 2017, 7 patients underwent stone removal with a flexible cystoscope during laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.Conclusion: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty and pyelolithotomy, with simultaneous use of flexible cystoscopy in UPJ obstruction patients with kidney stones and patients with multiple renal stones is a feasible treatment option, with a high success rate.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Laparoskopik pyeloplasti · laparoskopik pyelolitotomi · fleksible sistoskopi

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy are widely used in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstructions and renal stones in the urology field. Flexible cystoscopy can be used simultaneously with these methods for removal of calyceal stones in patients with UPJ obstructions. The present study assessed the usefulness of these surgical procedures .Material and Methods: Between February 2016 and October 2017, 7 patients underwent stone removal with a flexible cystoscope during laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. The durations of the operations and hospital stays, blood loss, preoperative and post- operative complications, and follow-up times were evaluated.Results: Five of seven patients had renal stones with UPJ obstruction. Two patients had calyceal stones in the lower calyx , in addition to renal pelvic stones. The mean age of the patients was 36.8 (18–73) years. The stone-free rate was 85.7%. The mean duration of the operation was 153.5 (105–230) min, and the duration of the hospital stay was 4.4 (3–7) days. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.Conclusion: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty and pyelolithotomy, with simultaneous use of flexible cystoscopy in UPJ obstruction patients with kidney stones and patients with multiple renal stones is a feasible treatment option, with a high success rate.

Özet

Amaç: Laparoskpik cerrahisinin üroloji alanından yaygınlaşması ile üreteropelvik bileşke darlığı (ÜPBD) ve böbrek taşlarının tedavisinde laparoskopik pyeloplasti ve laparoskopik pyelolitotomi yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. İlave kaliks taşlarının çıkarılmasında bu yöntemlerle eş zamanlı olarak fleksible sistoskop kullanılabilmektedir. Biz çalışmamızda bu cerrahi prosedürlerin kullanılabilirliğini değerlendirdik.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Şubat 2016-Ekim 2017 tarihleri arasında 7 hastaya laparoskopik pyeloplasti ve laparoskopik pyelolitotomi esnasında fleksible sistoskop ile taş çıkarılması işlemi uygulandı. Hastaların operasyon süresi, kan kaybı, hastanede kalış süresi, peroperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyonlar ve takip süreleri değerlendirildi.Bulgular: 7 hastanın 5’inde UPBD ile birlikte böbrek taşları mevcuttu. 2 hastada ise renal pelvis taşına eşlik eden alt kaliks taşları mevcuttu. Hastaların ortalama yaşları 36.8 (18-73) idi. Taşsızlık oranı % 85,7 olarak hesaplandı. Ortalama operasyon süresi 153,5 (105-230) dakika olup, hastanede kalış süresi 4,4(3-7) gün idi. İntraopratif ve postoperatif herhangi bir komplikasyon gelişmedi.Sonuç: UPBD’na böbrek taşı eşlik eden hastalarda ve multipl böbrek taşı olan hastalarda laparoskopik pyeloplasti ve pyelolitotomi ile eş zamanlı fleksible sistoskop kullanımı yüksek başarı oranı ile kullanılabilir bir tedavi seçeneğidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİTKİN, A., AYDİN, M., AKGUNES, E., KELES, M., ATİLLA, M. K., IRKİLATA, L. (2019). Use of Flexible Cystoscope in Removal of Stone in Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Pyelolithotomy. Yeni Üroloji Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 43–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/711114

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Prem- inger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150: 1795- 1799
  2. Rivas JG, Gregorio SA, Sanchez LC, et al. Evolution in the treatment of the ureteropelvic junction obstruction syn- drome. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty. Cent Euro- pean J Urol 2015;68:384-8
  3. Gamboro G, Fabris A, Puliatta D, Lupo A. Lithiasis in cystic kidney disease and malformations of the urinary tract. Urol Res 2006;34:102-7
  4. Stein RJ, Turna B, Nguyen MM, et al. Laparoscopic pyelo- plasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy: technique and outcomes. J Endourol 2008;22:1251-5
  5. Srivastava A, Singh P, Gupta M, et al. Laparoscopic pyelo- plasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy--is it an effective mode of treatment? Urol Int 2008;80:306-9
  6. Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC, Darshane AS. Retroper- itoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J Urol 1994;151:927-9
  7. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interven-tional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2016;69:475-82
  8. Salvadó JA, Guzmán S, Trucco CA, Parra CA. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: optimizing surgical technique. J Endourol 2009;23:575-8; discussion 578
  9. Thomaz DF. Fetaluropathy. Br J Urol 1990;66:225-31
  10. Bachmann A, Ruszat R, Forster T, et al. Retroperitoneo-scopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruc- tion (UPJO): solving the technical difficulties. Eur Urol 2006;49:264-272
  11. Scardino PT, Scardino PL. Obstruction at the ureteropelvic junction. In: Bergman H, ed. The Ureter. 2nd ed. New York: Springer- Verlag; 1981:697; Chapter 33
  12. Dimarco DS, Gettman MT, McGee SM, et al. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyelo- plasty at a single institution. J Endourol 2006; 20: 707–712
  13. Samarasekera D, Chew BH. Endopyelotomy still has an im- portant role in the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Can Urol Assoc J 2011; 5: 134– 136
  14. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:899-906; discussion 906
  15. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol 2002; 167: 1253– 1256
  16. Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status. BJU Int 2005; 95: 102–105
  17. Moon DA, El-Shazly MA, Chang CM, Gianduzzo TR, Eden CG. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 2006; 67: 932–936
  18. Ramakumar S, Lancicni V,