SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2015 / Sayı: 15

THE RELATIVE SENSITIVITIES ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE ECONOMIC GROWTH RATE AND SELECTED MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES: TURKEY CASE

EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ORANI VE SEÇİLMİŞ MAKROEKONOMİK DEĞİŞKENLER ARASINDA BAĞIL DUYARLILIK ANALİZİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Dilek SÜREKÇİ YAMAÇLI
Pages
381–396
Publication Date
2015-06-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of study, consumption budget balance has higher relative sensitivity on the economic growth rate than the other variables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is the investigation of the relations between the selected macroeconomic variables and the economic growth rate for the period of 1987-2010 in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results of study, consumption budget balance has higher relative sensitivity on the economic growth rate than the other variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, for the stabilization of the economic growth rate, especially consumption expenditure and budget deficit should be considered
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ekonomik Büyüme · Makro Modeller · Bağıl Duyarlılık Analizi

Abstract

The aim of this study is the investigation of the relations between the selected macroeconomic variables and the economic growth rate for the period of 1987-2010 in Turkey. Relative Sensitivities Analyasis (RSA) was used to accomplish this aim. This statistical method is used for examining the relationships between variables in the over time. According to the results of study, consumption budget balance has higher relative sensitivity on the economic growth rate than the other variables. On the other hand, changes in the stock of external debt and current account deficit have no effect on the economic growth rate, expect periods of 1991, 1994, 2001 and 2008-2009. In this context, for the stabilization of the economic growth rate, especially consumption expenditure and budget deficit should be considered

Özet

Bu çalıĢmanın amacı bazı makroekonomik göstergeler ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki iliĢkileri,1987- 2010 dönemi Türkiye için incelemektir. Bu amaçla Bağıl Duyarlılık Analizi kullanılmıĢtır. Bu istatistiksel yöntem değiĢkenler arasındaki iliĢkileri, zaman içindeki değiĢimleri dikkate alarak, kapsamlı biçimde incelemektedir. ÇalıĢmanın sonuçlarına göre, tüketim harcamaları ve bütçe dengesinin ekonomik büyüme üzerinde diğer değiĢkenlere göre bağıl duyarlılığı yüksektir. Öte yandan, dıĢ borç stoku ve cari açıktaki değiĢimler ile ekonomik büyüme arasında, 1991, 1994, 2001 ve 2008-2008 dönemleri dıĢında, bağıl duyarlılık zayıftır. Bu kapsamda, ekonomik büyüme hızının istikrar kazanmasında özellikle tüketim harcamaları ve bütçe dengesine kontrol edilmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAMAÇLI, D. S. (2015). THE RELATIVE SENSITIVITIES ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE ECONOMIC GROWTH RATE AND SELECTED MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES: TURKEY CASE. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 15, 381–396. https://ajindex.com/articles/709371

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. ARNOLD, J., JAVORCIK, B.S., MATTOO, A. (2011), “Does Services Liberalization Benefit Manufacturing Firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic”, Journal of International Economics, 85(1), 136-146.
  2. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M., DOMAC, I. (1995), “Export growth and economic growth in Turkey: Evidence from cointegration analysis”, METU Studies in Development, 22, 67-77.
  3. ISENRING, E. A., BAUER, J. D., GASKILL, D., BANKS, M. (2009), “The Malnutrition Screening Tool is a useful tool for identifying malnutrition risk in residential aged care”, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 22(6), 545–550.
  4. BORGONOVO, E. AND PECCATI, L. (2004), “Sensitivity Analysis in Investment Project Evaluation”, International Journal of Production Economics, 90 (1), 17-25.
  5. BORGONOVO, E. AND PECCATI, L. (2006), “Uncertainity and Global Sensitivity Analysis in the Evaluation of Investment Projects”, Int. J. of Production Economics, 104(1), 62-73.
  6. BUSSIERE, M., FRATZSCHER, M., MULLER, G. (2004), “Current Account Dynamics in OECD and EU Acceding Countries: An Intertemporal Approach”, European Central Bank Working Paper. No. 311, http://ssrn.com/ abstract=515074, Access date: 15.05.2004.
  7. CALDERON, A., C., CHONG, A., LOAYZO, N. V. (2002), “Determinants of Current Account Deficits in Developing Countries”, The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2(1), 1-33.
  8. CHINN, M. AND PARASAD, E. S. (2000), “Medium Term Determinants of Current Accounts in Industrial and Developing Countries: An Empirical Exploration”, NBER Working Paper. No.7581, http://www.nber.org/papers/w7581, Access date: 01.03.2000.
  9. DAVIDSON R., MACKINNON, J.G. (1993), “Estimation and Inference in Econometrics”, London: Oxford University Press.
  10. DEBELLE, G. AND FARUQEE H. (1996), “What Determines the Current Account?”, IMF Working Paper, No.96/58. DEMİRBAŞ, S. (1999), “Cointegration Analysis-Causality Testing and Wagner's Law: The Case of Turkey 1950-1990”, University of Leicster Discussion Papers,99/2,http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/economics/research/discussion-papers/discussion-papers-in-economics, Access date: 01.05.1999.
  11. DOLLAR, D. (1992), “Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do More Grow more Rapidly: Evidence form 95 LDC’s, 1976-1985”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40(3), 523-44.
  12. DOMINGUEZ, K. (2005), Economics Perspective in Singapore”, (http//www.personalumich.edu/kathrynd/SIngapore), ENDERS, WALTER (1995),
  13. Applied Econometric Time Series, John Wiley&Sons: New York. FRANKEL, J.A., ROMER, D., (1999), “Does Trade Cause