Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2021 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

STABILITY ANALYSIS OF SOME SOYBEAN GENOTYPES USING PARAMETRIC AND NONPARAMETRIC METHODS IN MULTI-ENVIRONMENTS

Pages
262–271
Publication Date
2021-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the coefficient of regression (bi) had positively significant associated with CVi, αi (P<0.01) and Ri2 (P<0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Seed yields of 14 soybean genotypes were evaluated in four locations i.e.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Adana, Şanlıurfa, Antalya and İzmir under second crop conditions through summer seasons from 2014 to 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the coefficient of regression (bi) had positively significant associated with CVi, αi (P<0.01) and Ri2 (P<0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Adaptation · Glycine max · Genotype x environment interaction

Abstract

Seed yields of 14 soybean genotypes were evaluated in four locations i.e. Adana, Şanlıurfa, Antalya and İzmir under second crop conditions through summer seasons from 2014 to 2016. The aims of research are to estimate the stability parameters in terms of seed yield of 14 soybean genotypes by used different stability analysis methods across eleven environmental conditions and to study interrelationship among these stability methods. The analysis of variance for seed yield revealed that the genotypes and the environments as well as the genotype x environment interactions (GEI) were statistically significant at P<0.01. Environmental effects were contributed of 51.04% to the total sum of squares whereas GEI and genotype effects were 20.8% and 2.59%, respectively. According to most of stability methods, BATEM 223, BATEM 306, BATEM 317 and KASM 02 were determined to be stable genotypes. These genotypes demonstrated superior adaptability with high yield performances in many environments. Results of correlation analysis indicated that seed yield was positively and significantly correlated with Di2 (P<0.01), Si(6) (P<0.05) and TOP (P<0.01) and showed a negative and significant correlation with Pi (P<0.01) and RS (P<0.01). In addition, the coefficient of regression (bi) had positively significant associated with CVi, αi (P<0.01) and Ri2 (P<0.05).

🔖

Cite This Article

CUBUKCU, P., KOCATÜRK, M., İLKER, E., KADİROĞLU, A., VURARAK, Y., ŞAHİN, Y., KARAKUŞ, M., YILDIRIM, Ü. A., GÖKSOY, A., SİNCİK, M. (2021). STABILITY ANALYSIS OF SOME SOYBEAN GENOTYPES USING PARAMETRIC AND NONPARAMETRIC METHODS IN MULTI-ENVIRONMENTS. Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 262–271. https://ajindex.com/articles/705370

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Al-Assily, Kh.A. S.M. Nasr,, Kh. A. Ali. 1996. Genotype × environment interaction, yield stability and adaptability for soybean (Glycine max L.). J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 21: 3779-3789.
  2. Becker, H.C., J. Leon. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed., 101: 1-23.
  3. Carvalho, C.G.P., C.A.A. Arias, J.F.F. Toledo, L.A. Almeida, R.A.S. Kiihl, M.F. Oliveira. 2002. Adaptability and stability study of soybean lines developed for high yield in Paraná State using four methodologies. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 2(2): 247-256.
  4. Chaudhary, K.R., J. Wu. 2012. Stability analysis for yield and seed quality of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merril] across different environments in eastern South Dakota. Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture, Kansas State University. Cheelo, P., D. Lungu, M. Mwala. 2017. GGE biplot analysis for identification of ideal soybean [Glycine max L. Merrill] test and production locations in Zambia. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 15(3): 1-15.
  5. Cruz, C.D. 2006. Programa Genes – Estatística Experimental e Matrizes. Viçosa, MG: UFV. Cruz, C.D., P.C.S. Carneiro. 2006. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. Viçosa: UFV, 2: 585p Cruz C.D., A.J. Regazzi, P.C.S. Carneiro. (2012). Biometric models applied to genetic improvement. Viçosa, MG: UFV, 1: 514. Cucolotto, M., V.C. Pipolo, D.D. Garbuglio, N.S.F. Junior, D. Destro, M.K. Kamikoga. 2007. Genotype x environment interaction in soybean: evaluation through three methodologies. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 7: 270-277.
  6. Eberhart, S.A., W.A. Russelli. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci., 6: 36-40.
  7. Edugbo, R.E., G.E. Nwofia, L.S. Fayeun. 2015. An assessment of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) grain yield in different environments using AMMI and GGE biplot models in humidorest fringes of southeast Nigeria. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, 48(3-4): 82-90.
  8. EL-Refaey, R.A., E.H. EL-Seidy, M.A. El-Borai, T.M. Abu Sein. 2013. Phenotypic stability parameters of yield for some soybean genotypes. Egypt Journal of Plant Breed., 17(2): 455-466.
  9. Fox, P.N., B. Skovmand, B.K. Thompson, H.J. Braun, R. Cormier. 1990. Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica, 47: 57-64.
  10. Francis, T.R., L.W. Kannenberg. 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can J. Plant Sci., 58: 1029-1034.
  11. Freiria, G.H., L.S.A. Gonçalves, F.F. Furlan, N.S.F. Junior, W.F.