Journals / Turkish Journal Of Field Crops / 2022 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF PGPR ON YIELD AND SOME YIELD COMPONENTS IN WINTER WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.)

Pages
127–133
Publication Date
2022-06-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, we can mention that using PGPR promotes wheat growth and lead to increasing yield in the wheat.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The growth of plants promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) that live actively in plant roots and rhizosphere and support plant growth has gained widespread importance in agriculture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was carried out to obtain and identify PGPR isolates from wheat soil and determine their ability and capacity on plant growth and yield.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, we can mention that using PGPR promotes wheat growth and lead to increasing yield in the wheat.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:PGPR · plant growth · seed treatment

Abstract

The growth of plants promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) that live actively in plant roots and rhizosphere and support plant growth has gained widespread importance in agriculture. This study was carried out to obtain and identify PGPR isolates from wheat soil and determine their ability and capacity on plant growth and yield. So, PGPR isolates were obtained from soil, and they were identified as Bacillus sp. (B. simplex and B. pumilus) by biochemical tests and MALDI-TOF MS. After the wheat seeds (Flamura-85) were treated PGPR, the field experiment was conducted with inoculated and non-inoculated seeds at the area of the Field Crops Department, Tekirdag Namık Kemal University in 2016-2018. The experiment was arranged in a split-plot design with three replicates for each treatment. In the experiment, some parameters such as plant height (PH), spike length (SL), number of grain per spike (NGPS), grain weight per spike (GWPS), and grain yield (GY) were evaluated and compared between treatments. The study has shown that PGPR treatments support plant growth and significantly increase yield between 9.6% and 29.29%. Especially, W3 and W4 strains (B. simplex) were showed a significant effect on grain yield. According to the results, we can mention that using PGPR promotes wheat growth and lead to increasing yield in the wheat. The use of PGPR can give promising results for sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural practices.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖKSEL, C., BALKAN, A., BİLGİN, O., MİRİK, M., BAŞER, İ. (2022). INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF PGPR ON YIELD AND SOME YIELD COMPONENTS IN WINTER WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.). Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 127–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/705348

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Acevedo, E., M. Nachit and G. Ortiz-Ferrara 1991. Effects of heat stress on wheat and possible selection tools for use in breeding for tolerance. In D.A Saunders, ed. Wheat for the Nontraditional Warm Areas, p. 401-421.
  2. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT. Adesemoye A.O., M. Obini and E.O. Ugoji 2008. Comparison of plant growth promotion with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis in three vegetables. Brazilian J. Microbiol., 39, 423–426.
  3. Adesemoye, A., H. Torbert, and J. Kloepper 2009. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microbial Ecology, 58, 921e929. Akbar M., N. Aslam, T. Khalil, S. Akhtar, E. M. Siddiqi and M.S. Iqbal 2019. Effects of seed priming with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on wheat yield and soil properties under contrasting soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 42(17). https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1655041.
  4. Alsaady, M.H.M., H.A. Salim, H.M. Aboud, R.A. Al-ani and A.K. Abdulrazzaq 2020. Impact of PGPR bacteria against crown rot disease on wheat. Science Archives, 1(3), 89-97.
  5. Aloo, B. N., B. A Makumba and E.R. Mbega 2019. The potential of Bacilli rhizobacteria for sustainable crop production and environmental sustainability. Microbiol. Res. 219, 26–39.
  6. Backman, P. A., M. Wilson and J.F. Murphy 1997. Bacteria for biological control of plant diseases. In N. A. Rechcigl, & J. E. Rechcigl (Eds.), Environmentally safe approaches to crop disease control (pp. 95e109). Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers.
  7. Bashan, Y. and L.E.de-Bashan 2005. Bacteria plant growth-promotion. In: Hillel, D. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 103–115.
  8. Bashan, Y., L.E. de-Bashan S.R. Prabhu and J.P. Hernandez 2014. Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: formulations and practical perspectives (1998–2013). Plant Soil 378, 1–33. Battacharyya P.N and D.K. Jha 2012. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 28(4):1327-50.
  9. Beauregard, P. B., Y. Chai, H. Vlamakis, R. Losick and R. Kolter 2013. Bacillus subtilis biofilm induction by plant polysaccharides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E1621–E1630. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218984110. Berendsen, E. M., R.A. Koning, J. Boekhorst, A. de Jong, O.P. Kuipers and M.H.J. Wells-Bennik, 2016. High-level heat resistance of spores of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus licheniformis results from the presence of a spoVA operon in a Tn1546 transposon. Front. Micro