Journals / Teknik Dergi / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 5

Geotechnical Design with Respect to TBDY-2018: Liquefaction and Soil-Pile -Structure Interaction Analyses

TBDY 2018'e Göre Geoteknik Tasarım: Sıvılaşma ve Yapı-Kazık-Zemin Etkileşimi Analizleri

Pages
11197–11226
Publication Date
2021-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The problematic issues such as the determination of Mw values that were used during liquefaction analyses, the search for time histories records to be scaled, the absence of recommended tolerable limits for the foundation soil settlements and different assumptions underlying the kinematic and inertial interaction approaches for Method III were addressed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explores the design steps of a building foundation in liquefiable soils according to TBDY 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, geotechnical engineering design was performed in stages including the liquefaction and soil-pile-structure interaction analyses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The problematic issues such as the determination of Mw values that were used during liquefaction analyses, the search for time histories records to be scaled, the absence of recommended tolerable limits for the foundation soil settlements and different assumptions underlying the kinematic and inertial interaction approaches for Method III were addressed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:TBDY · arazi zemin modeli · derin temel sistemi tasarımı

Abstract

This study explores the design steps of a building foundation in liquefiable soils according to TBDY 2018. For this purpose, geotechnical engineering design was performed in stages including the liquefaction and soil-pile-structure interaction analyses. The problematic issues such as the determination of Mw values that were used during liquefaction analyses, the search for time histories records to be scaled, the absence of recommended tolerable limits for the foundation soil settlements and different assumptions underlying the kinematic and inertial interaction approaches for Method III were addressed.

Özet

Bu çalışma Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği (TBDY) 2018'e göre sıvılaşma potansiyeli olan zeminlerde derin temel tasarım adımlarını irdelemektedir. Bu amaçla, 1 Ocak 2019'dan itibaren yürürlükte olan yeni TBDY'e göre Mudanya'da inşa edilmesi planlanan bir apartman yapısının sıvılaşma ve zemin-kazık-yapı etkileşim analizleri de dahil olmak üzere geoteknik mühendislik tasarım aşamaları gerçekleştirilmiş ve sunulmuştur. Sıvılaşma analizlerindeki belirsizlikler, deprem kayıtlarının elde edilmesindeki ve ölçeklenmesindeki zorluklar, oturma sınır değerlerinin yönetmelikte belirtilmemesi ve Yöntem III'teki kinematik ve eylemsizlik etkileşimi analizi yaklaşımlarındaki farklı davranış kabullerine bu çalışmada dikkat çekilmiş ve tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALVER, O., SEZEN, A., ESELLER-BAYAT, E. E. (2021). Geotechnical Design with Respect to TBDY-2018: Liquefaction and Soil-Pile -Structure Interaction Analyses. Teknik Dergi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 5, 11197–11226. https://ajindex.com/articles/703185

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. TBDY, Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği, AFAD, Türkiye, 2018.
  2. Hatanaka, M., & Uchida, A., Emprical Correlation between Penetration Resistance and Internal Friction Angle of Sandy Soils. Soils and Foundations, Vol. 36, No.4, pp. 1-10, 1996.
  3. Kulhawy, F.H., & Mayne, P.W., Manual on Estimating Soil Properties for Foundation Design. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, 1990.
  4. Wair, B.R., DeJong, J.T. & Shantz, T., Guidelines For Estimation Of Shear Wave Velocity Profiles. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center. PEER Report 2012/08, 2012.
  5. Youd, T. L., & Idriss, I. M., Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 127(4), 297-313, 2001. ASCE/SEI 7-10. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. 2010.
  6. NEHRP, Research Paper 12, Evaluation of geologic hazards and determination of seismic lateral earth pressures. Recommended Seismic Provisions, 2009.
  7. Akkar, S., Azak Eroğlu, T., Çan, T., Çeken, U., Demircioğlu M.B., Duman, T., Ergintav, S., Kadirioğlu, F.T., Kalafat, D., Kale, Ö., Kartal R.F., Kılıç, T., Özalp, S., Şeşetyan, K., Tekin, S., Yakıt, A., Yılmaz, M.T., Zülfikar, Ö., Türkiye Sismik Tehlike Haritasının Güncellenmesi. AFAD, Proje No: UDAP-Ç-13-06, 2014. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, PEER Strong Motion Database, http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/, 2006.
  8. Ordonez, G.A., RSPMATCH. A computer program for GeoMotions. http://www.geomotions.com, 2005.
  9. Hashash, Y.M.A., Musgrove, M.I., Harmon, J.A., Ilhan, O., Groholski, D.R., Phillips, C.A., and Park, D., DEEPSOIL 7.0, User Manual. 2017.
  10. Kondner, R. L. and Zelasko, J. S., A hyperbolic stress-strain formulation of sands. Proceedings of the 2nd Pan American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Sao Paulo, Brasil, 289-324, 1963.
  11. Matasovic, N, and Vucetic, M., Cyclic Characterization of Liquefiable Sands. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 11, pp 1805-1822, 1993.
  12. Darendeli, M.B., Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 2001.
  13. Chiaradonna, A., Bilotta, E., d’Onofrio, A.,. Flora, A. & Silvestri, F., A Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Post-Seismic Settlements in Liquefiable Soils. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V