It was found that Bacillariophyta was the dominant group with 43 taxa in the stomach of T. punctipennis.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Larval chironomids feed on algae, diatomae, detritus, decaying plant and animal fragments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was found that Bacillariophyta was the dominant group with 43 taxa in the stomach of T. punctipennis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was followed by Cyanophyta with 7 taxa, Euglenophyta with 6 taxa, Chlorophyta with 4 taxa, Carophyta with 2 taxa, and Rhodophyta with 1 taxa.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tanypus punctipennis · Gut content · Algal flora
Özet
Larval chironomids feed on algae, diatomae, detritus, decaying plant and animal fragments. The larvae in turn are food for other carnivore and omnivore animals. Thus, larval chironomids have a very important role in the aquatic food cycle. In this study, the algal flora in the stomachs of Tanypus punctipennis, which is known as a very common species in Turkish Thrace, was examined in terms of qualitative and quantitative factors. It was found that Bacillariophyta was the dominant group with 43 taxa in the stomach of T. punctipennis. It was followed by Cyanophyta with 7 taxa, Euglenophyta with 6 taxa, Chlorophyta with 4 taxa, Carophyta with 2 taxa, and Rhodophyta with 1 taxa.
ÖTERLER, B., AYDIN, G. B., ELİPEK, B. Ç. (2018). Qualitative and Quantitative Examination of Algal Flora in the Gut Content of <i>Tanypus punctipennis</i> Meigen, 1818. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 88–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/701182
Cummins, K. W., Merritt, R. W., Andrade, P. C. N. 2005. The use of invertebrate functional groups to characterize ecosystem attributes in selected streams and rivers in south Brazil. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 40(1), 69-89
Lemes-Silva, A. L., Pagliosa P. R., Petrucio, M. M. 2014. Inter- and intra-guild patterns of food resource utilization by chironomid larvae in a subtropical coastal lagoon. Limnology, 15(1), 1-12
Morin, P. J. 2011. Community Ecology. 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 321p
Sanseverino, A. M., Nessimian, J. L. 2008. Larvas de Chironomidae (Diptera) em depositos de folhico submerso em um riacho de primeira ordem da Mata Atlantica (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 52(1), 95-104
Ferrington, L. C. 2008. Global diversity of non-biting midges (Chironomidae; Insecta-Diptera) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia, 595, 447-455
Silva, F. L., Ruiz, S. S., Bochini, G. L., Moreira, D. C. 2008. Functional Feeding Habits of Chironomidae Larvae (Insecta, Dipotera) In a Lotic System From Midwestern Region of Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Panamjas, 3(2), 135–141
Berg, H. B. 1995. Larval food and feeding behaviour. Pp.136-168. In: Armitage P. D., P. S. Cranston, and L. C. V. Pinder (ed.)1995. The Chironomidae: biology and ecology of nonbiting midges. Chapman & Hall, London. 571
Rosa, B. F. J. V., Dias-Silva, M. V. D., Alves R. G. 2013. Composition and structure of the Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera) community associated with Bryophytes in a first-order stream in the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology. 42(1), 15– 21
Baker, A. S., Mclachlan, A. J. 1979. Food preferences of tanypodinae larvae (Diptera: Chironomidae). Hydrobiologia, 62, 283-288
Tatole, V. 2000. Checklist of Chironomidae (Diptera) of Romania. Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa”, 42, 117-132
Arnold, M., György, D. 2004. Checklist of the non-biting midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) of Hungary with notes on records and peculiarity of the occurrence of the species. Acta Biologica, 12, 39-207
Özkan, N. 2006. Fauna of Chironomid (Chironomidae; Diptera) in Turkish Thrace Region (Kırklareli, Tekirdağ, İstanbul and Çanakkale). E.U. Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, 23(1-2), 125–132
Özkan, N., Çamur-Elipek, B. 2006. The Dynamics of Chironomidae Larvae (Diptera) and the Water Quality in Meriç River (Edirne/Turkey). Tiscia, 35, 49-54