Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: Özel

Optimal Asymptotic Tests for Nakagami Distribution

Pages
487–492
Publication Date
2018-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These tests are then compared in terms of type I error and power of test by a Monte Carlo simulation study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nakagami distribution is often used to model positive valued data with right skewness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The distribution includes some familiar distributions as special cases such as Rayleigh and Half-normal distributions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These tests are then compared in terms of type I error and power of test by a Monte Carlo simulation study.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Likelihood Ratio test · Score test · C(α) test

Özet

Nakagami distribution is often used to model positive valued data with right skewness. The distribution includes some familiar distributions as special cases such as Rayleigh and Half-normal distributions. In real life applications, one of the simpler model may be sufficient to describe data. The aim of this paper is to adapt tests of goodness of fit of the Rayleigh distribution against Nakagami distribution. In this study likelihood ratio, and score tests are specifically obtained. These tests are then compared in terms of type I error and power of test by a Monte Carlo simulation study.

🔖

Cite This Article

OZONUR, D., AKDUR, H. T. K., BAYRAK, H. (2018). Optimal Asymptotic Tests for Nakagami Distribution. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: Özel, 487–492. https://ajindex.com/articles/701138

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Nakagami, M. 1960. The m-distribution: a general formulation of intensity distribution of rapid fading. In W.C. Hoffman (ed.), Statistical Method in Radio Wave Propagation. Tarrytown, NY: Pergamon, 3–36
  2. Sarkar, S., Goel, N.K., Mathur, B.S. 2009. Adequacy of Nakagami-m distribution function to derive GIUH. J. Hydrol. Eng. 14, 1070–1079
  3. Sarkar, S., Goel, N.K., Mathur, B.S. 2010. Performance investigation of Nakagami-m distribution to derive flood hydrograph by genetic algorithm optimization approach. J. Hydrol. Eng. 15, 658–666
  4. Shankar, P.M., Piccoli, C.W., Reid, J.M., Forsberg, F., Goldberg, B.B. 2005. Application of the compound probability density function for characterization of breast masses in ultrasound B scans. Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 2241–2248
  5. Tsui, P.H., Huang, C.C.,Wang, S.H. 2006. Use of Nakagami distribution and logarithmic compression in ultrasonic tissue characterization. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 26, 69–73
  6. Kim, K., Latchman, H.A. 2009. Statistical traffic modeling of MPEG frame size: Experiments and analysis. J. Systemics, Cybernetics Inform. 7, 54–59
  7. Carcole, E., Sato, H. 2009. Statistics of the punctuations of the amplitude of coda waves of local earthquakes. Abstracts of the Seismological Society of Japan, Kyoto, Japan, C31–13
  8. Nakahara, H., Carcole, E. 2010. Maximum likelihood method for estimating Coda Q and the Nakagami-m parameter. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100, 3174-3182
  9. Ozonur, D., Akdur, H.T.K., Bayrak, H. 2017. A comparison of goodness of fit tests of Rayleigh distribution against Nakagami distribution. 10th International Statistics Congress, 06-08 December, Ankara, 107
  10. Rao, C.R. 1947. Large sample tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters with application to problems of estimation. Proceedings of Cambridge Philosophical Society 44, 50-57
  11. Moran, P.A. 1970. On asymptotically optimal tests of composite hypotheses. Biometrika, 57(1), 47-55
  12. Cox, D.R, Hinkley, D.V. 1974. Theoretical Statistics. Chapman and Hall: New York, 511p
  13. Bartoo, J.B, Puri, P.S. 1967. On optimal asymptotic tests of composite statistical hypotheses. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38, 1845-1852
  14. Breslow, N.E. 1990. Test of hypotheses in over-dispersed Poisson and other quasi-likelihood models. Journal of American Statistical Association, 85, 565-571
  15. Rayner, J.C., Thas, O., Best, D. J. 2009. Smooth tests of goodness of fit: using R. John Wiley & Sons, 272p
  16. Bera, A.K., Bilia