SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 55

ASK CULTURAL COMPETENCY SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE: ADAPTATION TO TURKISH, VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

KÜLTÜREL YETKİNLİK KENDİNİ DEĞERLENDİRME ÖLÇEĞİ: TÜRKÇEYE UYARLANMASI, GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Şerif UZUNASLAN
Elif GÖKÇEARSLAN ÇİFCİ
Pages
211–226
Publication Date
2022-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the analysis it was observed that there were statistically significant differences between the lower and upper groups (t (130):21,93, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the scale named “ASK Cultural Competency Self-Assessment Scale” developed by Leung and Cheung (2013) was adapted to Turkish by obtaining the necessary permissions from the developers of the scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The working group consists of 245 social workers actively working in the field of social work.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the analysis it was observed that there were statistically significant differences between the lower and upper groups (t (130):21,93, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sosyal Hizmet · Kültürel Yetkinlik Kendini Değerlendirme Ölçeği · Geçerlilik

Abstract

In this study, the scale named “ASK Cultural Competency Self-Assessment Scale” developed by Leung and Cheung (2013) was adapted to Turkish by obtaining the necessary permissions from the developers of the scale. The working group consists of 245 social workers actively working in the field of social work. The internal consistency coefficient calculated as 0,952 for the whole scale. Cronbach's alpha values calculated as 0,875 for the attitude evaluation dimension, 0,864 for the skill assessment dimension and 0,926 for the knowledge assessment dimension. The differences between the 27% lower and upper groups were examined in order to ensure the reliability procedures. In the analysis it was observed that there were statistically significant differences between the lower and upper groups (t (130):21,93, p

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Leung ve Cheung (2013) tarafından geliştirilen “ASK Cultural Competency Self-Assessment Scale” adlı ölçek, ölçeğin geliştiricilerinden gerekli izinler alınarak Türkçeye uyarlanmıştır. Çalışma grubunu sosyal hizmet alanında aktif olarak çalışan 246 sosyal hizmet uzmanı oluşturmaktadır. İç tutarlılık katsayısı (Cronbach’s alpha) ölçek bütünü için 0,952; tutum değerlendirme boyutu için 0,875; beceri değerlendirme boyutu için 0,864 ve bilgi değerlendirme boyutu için 0,926 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Güvenirlik işlemlerini sağlamak amacıyla %27’lik alt ve üst gruplar arasındaki farklar incelenmiştir. Yapılan çözümlemede (t (130):21,93, p

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUNASLAN, Ş., ÇİFCİ, E. G. (2022). ASK CULTURAL COMPETENCY SELF-ASSESSMENT SCALE: ADAPTATION TO TURKISH, VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 55, 211–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/700180

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abe, Y. (2019). Use of analogy in the development of intercultural competence. Philosophies, 4(2), 25. Akarçay Ulutaş, D. (2020). Sosyal Hizmette Kültürel Yetkinlik Eğitimi: İçeriğe Yönelik Bir Sistematik Derleme Çalışması. Journal of Society & Social Work, 31(3). Alizadeh, S. and Chavan, M. (2016). Cultural competence dimensions and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Health & Social Care in the Community, 24(6), e117-e130. Arat, G. and Kerelian, NN. (2019). Reshaping the social work education system toward cultural competency: The Hong Kong case. International Social Work, 62(1), 316-329.
  2. Bindak, R. (2005). İlköğretim Öğrencileri İçin Matematik Kaygı Ölçeği. Fırat Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(2), 442-448.
  3. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara:
  4. Pegem Akademi. Cross, Tl. (1989). Towards a culturally competent system of care: A monograph on effective services for minority children who are severely emotionally disturbed. DESA (Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2019 ) International Migrant Stock 2019:
  5. Country profile Turkey, Erişim Tarihi: 17 Mayıs 2020, https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/data/estimates2/countryprofiles.asp.
  6. Edwards, JB. (2016). Cultural Intelligence for Clinical Social Work Practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 44: 211–220
  7. Feize, L. (2015). Development of self-awareness and cultural competency in social work education (Doctoral dissertation, College of Social Work, University of Utah). Geertz, C. (2010). Kültürlerin Yorumlanması, (Çeviri: Hakan Gür), Ankara:
  8. Dost Kitabevi Yayınları.
  9. Henderson, S., Horne, M., Hills, R., & Kendall, E. (2018). Cultural Competence in Healthcare in The Community: A Concept Analysis. Health & Social Care in the Community, 26(4), 590-603.
  10. Jani, J. S., Osteen, P., and Shipe, S. (2016). Cultural Competence and Social Work Education: Moving Toward Assessment of Practice Behaviors. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(3), 311-324.
  11. Leung, P., and Cheung, M. (2013). Factor Analyzing The “ASK” Cultural Competency Self-Assessment Scale for Child Protective Services. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(12), 1993-2002.
  12. Levin-Keini, N., and Ben Shlomo, S. (2017). Development of Cultural Competence Among Social Work Students: A Psychoanalytic Perspective. Social work, 62(4), 349-357.
  13. Lum, D. (2010). Culturally competent practice: A framework for unders