Journals / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Experiences of Romani Women in Turkey

Pages
29–47
Publication Date
2016-02-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study was conducted in Bursa, the fourth biggest city in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The biggest and most problematic ethnic group suffering from poverty and racism in Europe, the Romani people are “the others” who have been marginalized and left to their fate also in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The women members of this group are more vulnerable to multiple discrimination and thus, constitute the one of the most disadvantaged group of the society.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study was conducted in Bursa, the fourth biggest city in Turkey.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Öz The biggest and most problematic ethnic group suffering from poverty and racism in Europe, the Romani people are “the others” who have been marginalized and left to their fate also in Turkey. The women members of this group are more vulnerable to multiple discrimination and thus, constitute the one of the most disadvantaged group of the society. The Romani people have almost no intellectual accumulation in Turkey or in Europe. They have almost no non-governmental organizations to fight for their economic, political and social rights, either. Therefore, until recently they have been either left alone to solve their problems on their own or abandoned to the justice of political power. The purpose of this study is to detect the perceived ethnic discrimination experiences of Romani women who live in Turkey but about whom there are no scientific data. In addition to this, the study also examines the effects of perceived discrimination experiences on group members’ self-esteem and hopelessness. The scales used to collect quantitative data are The Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Questionnaire, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and Beck Hopelessness Scale. The study was conducted in Bursa, the fourth biggest city in Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, M., MURAT, D., Aca, Z. (2016). Perceived Ethnic Discrimination Experiences of Romani Women in Turkey. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 29–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/69917

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abrams, Dominic. and Hogg, Michael A. 1988. Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination.European Journal of Social Psychology. 18 (4): 317-334.
  2. Ajrouch, Kristine J., Reisine. Susan., Lim, Sungwoo., Sohn, Woosung. and Ismail, Amid. 2010. Perceived everyday discrimination and psychological distress: Does social support matter?, Ethnicity & Health, 15(4): 417-434.
  3. Altan, Ömer Zühtü. 2007. Sosyal Politika. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  4. Altınöz, İsmail. 2013. Osmanlı Toplumunda Çingeneler. Ankara:
  5. Türk Tarih Kurumu. Asamen, Joy. K., and Berry, Gordon. L. 1987. Self-concept, alienation, and perceived prejudice: Implications for counseling with Asian Americans. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 15: 140-160.
  6. Asseo, Henriette. 2007. Çingeneler Bir Avrupa Yazgısı. İstanbul. Yapı Kredi Yayınları. AvrupaBirliği 2006
  7. Türkiye İlerleme Raporu (2006),http://www.madde14.org/images/5/54/2006turip.pdf, Access Date: 05.02. 2014. Avrupa Birliği 2007
  8. Türkiye İlerleme Raporu (2007), http://www.madde14.org/images/c/c9/2007turip.pdf, Access Date: 05.02. 2014. Avrupa Birliği 2008
  9. Türkiye İlerleme Raporu (2008), http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/AdaylikSureci/IlerlemeRaporlari/turkiye_ilerleme_rap_2008.pdf, Erişim: 05.02. 2014. Avrupa Birliği 2009
  10. Türkiye İlerleme Raporu (2009), http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/AdaylikSureci/IlerlemeRaporlari/turkiye_ilerleme_rap_2009.pdf, Access Date: 05.02. 2014. Avrupa Birliği 2010
  11. Türkiye İlerleme Raporu (2010), http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/AdaylikSureci/IlerlemeRaporlari/turkiye_ilerleme_rap_2010.pdf, Access Date: 05.02. 2014. Avrupa Birliği 2011
  12. Türkiye İlerleme Raporu (2011), http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/AdaylikSureci/IlerlemeRaporlari/2011_ilerleme_raporu_tr.pdf, Access Date: 05.02. 2014. Avrupa Birliği 2012
  13. Türkiye İlerleme Raporu (2012), http://www.abgs.gov.tr/files/strateji/2012_ilerleme_raporu.pdf, Access Date: 05.02. 2014. Avrupa Birliği 2013
  14. Türkiye İlerleme Raporu (2013), http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2013/package/tr_rapport_2013_en.pdf, Access Date: 05.02. 2014.
  15. Bayraktar, Özlem. 2011. Çingeneler: Başka Bir Dünyanin İnsanlari. Global Media Journal. Turkish Edition. 1 (2): 118-132.
  16. Beck A.T. (1988). Beck Hopelessness Scale.The Pyschological Corporation. Buğra, Ayşe ve Keyder, Çağlar. 2003. “Yeni Yoksulluk ve Türkiye’nin Değişen Refah Rejimi”. Birleşmiş Milletler Kalkınma Programı İç