Journals / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Rosenmuller Fossa with cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective radio-anatomical study

Rosenmuller Fossa'nın konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif bir radyo-anatomik çalışma

Pages
195–199
Publication Date
2019-11-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

KEYWORDS Cone beam computed tomography, Rosenmuller Fossa, Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Rosenmuller fossa (RF) is known as a lateral pharyngeal recess, is bilaterally located beneath the skull base and behind the torus tubarius.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study is to evaluation of RF with cone beam computed tomography Methods: A total of 150 subjects (80 females, 70 males, 6-88 years) were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:KEYWORDS Cone beam computed tomography, Rosenmuller Fossa, Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi · Rosenmuller fossa · Nazofaringeal karsinoma

Abstract

Background: Rosenmuller fossa (RF) is known as a lateral pharyngeal recess, is bilaterally located beneath the skull base and behind the torus tubarius. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is most commonly located in the RF. The purpose of this study is to evaluation of RF with cone beam computed tomography Methods: A total of 150 subjects (80 females, 70 males, 6-88 years) were included in the study. Subjects were divided into age groups (6- 20 years, 21-30 years, 31-40 years, 41-50 years, 51-60 years, over 60 years) and gender. Result: There is no statistically significant difference between class (RF type) and gender (p = 0.086). There is a statistically significant association between the categories of age group and class variables (p = 0.015). RF type 1 was more common in the 6-20 age and 21-30 age groups, whereas RF type 3 was more common in the 41-50 age and 51-60 age groups. Conclusion: When the literature was investigated, it was not found a study evaluating RF with cone beam computed tomography. When considering clinical significance, RF should be searched and examined in larger populations. KEYWORDS Cone beam computed tomography, Rosenmuller Fossa, Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Özet

Amaç: Rosenmuller fossa (RF) lateral faringeal girinti olarak bilinir, kafatasının altında ve torus tubarius'un arkasında bilateral olarak bulunur. Nazofaringeal karsinoma en sık Rosenmuller fossada gelişir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Rosenmuller fossanın konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya toplam 150 denek (80 kadın, 70 erkek, 6-88 yıl) dahil edildi. Denekler 6-20 yaş, 21-30 yaş, 31- 40 yaş, 41-50 yaş, 51-60 yaş ve 60 yaş üzeri olacak şekilde 6 yaş grubuna ve cinsiyete göre ayrıldı. Bulgular: Rosenmuller fossa tiplerinin görülme sıklıkları değerlendirildiğinde farklı yaş gruplarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur (p <0.05) veya (p = 0.015).6-20 yaş ve 21-30 yaş gruplarında RF tip 1 daha fazla görülürken, 41- 50 yaş ve 51-60 yaş gruplarında RF tip 3 daha fazla görüldü. Sonuç: Literatür incelendiğinde konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile Rosenmuller fossanın değerlendirildiği çalışma bulunamamıştır. Klinik önemi düşünüldüğünde Rosenmuller fossa daha geniş popülasyonlarda araştırılmalı ve incelenmelidir. ANAHTAR KELİMELER Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi, Rosenmuller fossa, Nazofaringeal karsinoma

🔖

Cite This Article

KAPLAN, F. A., BAYRAKDAR, İ. Ş., BİLGİR, E. (2019). Evaluation of Rosenmuller Fossa with cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective radio-anatomical study. Selcuk Dental Journal, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 195–199. https://ajindex.com/articles/698478

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Amene C, Cosetti M, Ambekar S, Guthikonda B, Nanda A. Johann Christian Rosenmuller (1771-1820): A Historical Perspective on the Man behind the Fossa. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2013;74(4):187-93
  2. Yu MC, Yuan JM. Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Semin Cancer Biol. 2002;12(6):421-9
  3. Bergin M, Bird P, Cowan I, Pearson JF. Exploring the critical distance and position relationships between the Eustachian tube and the internal carotid artery. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(9):1511-5
  4. Ahmad M, Freymiller E. Cone beam computed tomography: evaluation of maxillofacial pathology. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2010;38(1):41-7
  5. Takasugi Y, Futagawa K, Konishi T, Morimoto D, Okuda T. Possible association between successful intubation via the right nostril and anatomical variations of the nasopharynx during nasotracheal intubation: a multiplanar imaging study. J Anesth. 2016;30(6):987-93
  6. Compere WE, Jr. The relationship of the fossa of Rosenmuller to secretory otitis media. Laryngoscope. 1973;83(10):1581-4
  7. Loh LE, Chee TS, John AB. The anatomy of the Fossa of Rosenmuller--its possible influence on the detection of occult nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Singapore Med J. 1991;32(3):154-5
  8. Peters B, De Cuyper K, Vanhoenacker FM. Pear-Shaped Lesion of the Fossa of Rosenmuller. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2016;100(1):68
  9. Shilston J, Foo S, Oko M. Rhinolith in the fossa of Rosenmüller–a hidden stone. BMJ case reports. 2011;2011:bcr0920103352.