SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya Tıp Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Biparametric Prostate MRI Shows Similar Diagnostic Accuracy Rates for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric MRI

Biparametrik Prostat MRG, Multiparametrik MRG ile Prostat Kanseri Tespiti İçin Benzer Tanısal Doğruluk Oranları Gösterir

Ayşegül GÖRMEZ
Osman Melih TOPCUOĞLU
Faruk YENCİLEK
Pages
503–509
Publication Date
2022-09-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Overall diagnostic accuracy was similar for the bp-MRI and the mp-MRI for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of bp-MRI with standard mp-MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the bp-MRIs in comparison with mp-MRIs at 3 Tesla.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Overall diagnostic accuracy was similar for the bp-MRI and the mp-MRI for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:prostat · PI-RADS · biparametrik MRG

Abstract

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of bp-MRI with standard mp-MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the bp-MRIs in comparison with mp-MRIs at 3 Tesla. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), for bp- and mp-MRIs were calculated and compared. Results: A total of 202 patients with a mean age of 62.4±11.8 years (range from 31 to 86 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In patients with PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions; the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV for bp-MRI versus mp-MRI were 95.4%, 77.2%, 53.8%, 98.3% and 97.7% vs 73.4%, 50.5%, 99.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Overall diagnostic accuracy was similar for the bp-MRI and the mp-MRI for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.

Özet

Amaç: Prostat kanseri tanısında bp-MRG'nin tanısal doğruluğunu standart mp-MRI ile karşılaştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntemler: 3 Tesla MRG cihazında elde edilen bp-MRG bulguları mp-MRG bulguları ile karşılaştırmalı olarak retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Bp- ve mp-MRG'ler için duyarlılık, özgüllük, pozitif ve negatif prediktif değerler (PPV ve NPV) hesaplandı ve karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Ortalama yaşı 62.4±11.8 yıl (31-86 yıl aralığında) olan toplam 202 hasta dahil edilme kriterlerini karşıladı. PI-RADS 4 ve 5 lezyonlu hastalarda; bp-MRG ve mP-MRG için duyarlılık, özgüllük, PPV, NPV sırasıyla %95.4, %77.2, %53.8, %98.3 ve %97.7, %73.4, %50.5, %99.1 idi. Sonuç: PI-RADS 4 ve 5 lezyonları için tanısal doğruluk oranları bp-MRI ve mp-MRI için benzer bulundu.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖRMEZ, A., TOPCUOĞLU, O. M., YENCİLEK, F. (2022). Biparametric Prostate MRI Shows Similar Diagnostic Accuracy Rates for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric MRI. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 503–509. https://ajindex.com/articles/697791

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012;22:746-757.
  2. Vargas HA, Hotker AM, Goldman DA, et al. Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol 2016;26:1606-1612.
  3. Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol 2019;76:340-351.
  4. Thestrup KC, Logager V, Baslev I, et al. Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Acta Radiol Open 2016;5:2058460116663046. Boesen L, Norgaard N, Logager V, et al. Multiparametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing repeat biopsy: a prospective comparison with clinical findings and histopathology. Acta Radiol 2018;59:371-380.
  5. Di Campli E, Delli Pizzi A, Seccia B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience. Eur J Radiol 2018;101:17-23.
  6. Niu XK, Chen XH, Chen ZF, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Roentgenol 2018:1-10.
  7. Kuhl CK, Bruhn R, Kramer N, et al. Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen. Radiology 2017;285:493-505.
  8. Scialpi M, D'Andrea A, Martorana E, et al. Biparametric MRI of the prostate. Turk J Urol 2017;43:401-409.
  9. Scialpi M, Prosperi E, D'Andrea A, et al. Biparametric versus Multiparametric MRI with Non-endorectal Coil at 3T in the Detection and Localization of Prostate Cancer. Anticancer Res 2017;37:1263-1271.
  10. Fascelli M, Rais-Bahrami S, Sankineni S, et al. Combined Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Validation Study in a Biopsy-naive Patient Population. Urology 2016;88:125-134.
  11. Rais-Bahrami S, Siddiqui MM, Vourganti S, et al. Diagnostic value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based detection of prostate cancer in men without prior biopsies. BJU Int 2015;115:381-388. Cicchetti DV. Multiple comparison methods: establishing guidelines for their valid application in neuropsycholog