Journals / Review of Armenian Studies / 2019 / Sayı: 40

The Implications Of The Karabagh Conflict In The Context Of BSEC As A Regionalism Case

Bir Bölgeselcilik Örneği Olarak KEİ Bağlamında Karabağ Çatışmasının Yansımaları

Pages
49–89
Publication Date
2019-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the final analysis, the high likelihood of the stagnation of the BSEC is affirmed, given the persistence of the Karabagh conflict.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper inquires the impact and the implications of the Karabagh conflict in the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) context through the conceptualization of regionalism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the framework of the main argument that the Karabagh conflict stands as a major reason for the stagnation of the BSEC since its establishment, it first provides a brief account on the concepts of region and regionalism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the final analysis, the high likelihood of the stagnation of the BSEC is affirmed, given the persistence of the Karabagh conflict.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bölgeselcilik · KEİ · Türkiye

Abstract

This paper inquires the impact and the implications of the Karabagh conflict in the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) context through the conceptualization of regionalism. In the framework of the main argument that the Karabagh conflict stands as a major reason for the stagnation of the BSEC since its establishment, it first provides a brief account on the concepts of region and regionalism. Second, it provides information on the birth, the evolution, and the stagnation of the BSEC. Third, it investigates the reverberations of the Karabagh conflict on the basis of the data collected from the national and the international news archives. Fourth, it attempts to construe the data on the basis of the relevant sub-arguments in regionalism. In the final analysis, the high likelihood of the stagnation of the BSEC is affirmed, given the persistence of the Karabagh conflict.

Özet

Mevcut çalışma, bölgeselcilik kavramsallaştırması üzerinden Karadeniz Ekonomik İşbirliği Örgütü (KEİ) bağlamında Karabağ çatışmasının etkisi ve yansımalarını araştırmaktadır. Karabağ çatışmasının, tesis edilmesinden itibaren KEİ’nin duraksamasının başat nedeni olduğu temel savı çerçevesinde, öncelikle bölge ve bölgeselcilik kavramlarına ilişkin özet bir açıklama sunmaktadır. İkinci olarak, KEİ’nin doğuşu, evrimi ve duraksamasına dair bilgi vermektedir. Üçüncü olarak, ulusal ve uluslararası haber arşivlerinden elde edilen veriler temelinde Karabağ çatışmasının yansımalarını incelemektedir. Dördüncü olarak, söz konusu verilerin, bölgeselcilik dahilindeki ilgili alt savlar temelinde yorumlanmasına çalışılmaktadır. Nihai tahlilde, Karabağ çatışmasının devamlılığı dikkate alındığında, KEİ’nin gelecekte yüksek durağanlık olasılığı teyit edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKİNCİ, F. D. (2019). The Implications Of The Karabagh Conflict In The Context Of BSEC As A Regionalism Case. Review of Armenian Studies, Sayı: 40, 49–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/697289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. “11 Sign Economic Accord … Pledge Includes Six Old Soviet Republics.” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, June 26, 1992,
  2. LexisNexis Academic. Acar, Özgen. “Karadeniz Ekonomi Kuşağının 10. Yılı.” Cumhuriyet, June 25, 2002.
  3. Adler, Emmanuel, and Michael Barnett, eds. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  4. Allison, Laura. “Exogenous Factors: Are Other Regions Drivers of Integration?” In Drivers of Integration and Regionalism in Europe and Asia: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Louis Brennan and Philomena Murray, 347-65. London: Routledge, 2015.
  5. Alpay, Şahin. “Hakemliğe Gidelim.” Milliyet, November 4, 2000. Andreosso-O’Callaghan, Bernadette. “Trade and Investment Drivers: Qualifying the Type of Economic Integration in a Historical Perspective.” In Drivers of Integration and Regionalism in Europe and Asia: Comparative Perspectives, edited by Louis Brennan and Philomena Murray, 215-31. London: Routledge, 2015. “Armenia Cannot Explain Refusal to Participate at BSEC Meeting.” Trend News Agency, November 28, 2012. “Armenia Will Meet Davutoğlu with Exclamations ‘Renegade Has No Place in Armenia’.” ArmenPress, December 9, 2013,
  6. LexisNexis Academic. “Armenian FM Participates in OBSEC FMs’ 34th Session.” ArmenPress, July 1, 2016. https://armenpress.am/eng/news/852996/armenian-fm-participates-in-obsec-fmsE28099-34th-session.html “Armenian, Azeri Presidents Fail to Agree on Conflict – Belgian Report.” BBC Monitoring Europe – Political, June 6, 2006. “Armenian, Turkish Foreign Ministers Discuss Ties in İstanbul.” BBC Monitoring Trans Caucasus Unit, November 25, 2008,
  7. LexisNexis Academic. “Artık Karadeniz’e Yelken Açma Zamanı!” Cumhuriyet, June 19, 2007. “Asrın Projesi.” Star, June 17, 2007.
  8. Aybak, Tunç. “Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC) and Turkey: Extending European Integration to the East?” In Politics of the Black Sea: Dynamics of Cooperation and Conflict, edited by Tunç Aybak, 31-60.
  9. London, New York: I. B. Tauris Publishers, 2001. “Azerbaijan’s and Turkey’s Blockade of Armenia Contradicts Fundamental Principles of PABSEC, Sharmazanov Says in Tirana Sitting.” ArmenPress, June 21, 2018,
  10. LexisNexis Academic. “Azeriler Ağlıyor.” Türkiye, April 23, 1997. “Azeris, Armenians Accept Peace Invitation.” The Globe and Mail, February 4, 1992,
  11. LexisNexis Academic. “Baba, Süper Arabulucu.” Hürriyet, April 29, 1997.
  12. Berkan, İsmet. “Ermenistan’la Sil Baştan.” Radikal, June 6, 1998. “Black Sea Countries Plan Meeting in Tampa.” St. Petersburg Times, July 24, 19