Journals / Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Factors affecting patient satisfaction in peyroni surgery

Peyroni cerrahisinde hasta memnuniyetine etki eden faktörler

Pages
705–713
Publication Date
2020-09-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Providing a good preoperative information in terms of postoperative penile shortening and curvature recurrence may increase patient satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract Purpose: Surgical interventions are still the most effective treatment management for peyroni disease, which is the most common cause of penile curvature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material method: The records of patients who had been diagnosed with peyroni disease between 2012-2019 and who had been recommended peyroni surgery were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Providing a good preoperative information in terms of postoperative penile shortening and curvature recurrence may increase patient satisfaction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Peyroni hastalığı · peyroni cerrahisi · penil kısalma

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Surgical interventions are still the most effective treatment management for peyroni disease, which is the most common cause of penile curvature. We aimed to investigate the factors affecting patient satisfaction in peyroni surgery with functional and cosmetic results. Material method: The records of patients who had been diagnosed with peyroni disease between 2012-2019 and who had been recommended peyroni surgery were retrospectively analyzed. In the 1st year controls, the patients were evaluated together with their preoperative records in terms of erectile capacity, residual / recurrent penile deformity, penile length, and potential complications, and the factors affecting the effects were investigated by measuring their satisfaction levels. Results: Twenty-seven patients undergoing plication surgery (Group 1), and 21 patients undergoing incision saphenous vein graft surgery (Group 2) were identified. Patient satisfaction was 83.33% in group 1 and 67.14% in group 2. Penile shortening amount (2.71±1.41 cm) was higher in group 2 than group 1 (1.14±0.91 cm).When the parameters affecting the satisfaction of the patients are examined; There was a negative correlation between penis length (p=0.036), presence of erectile dysfunction before surgery (p=0.009), presence of plaque (p=0.002), presence of comorbid disease accompanying (p<0.001), presence of repeat complaints (p=0.006) and patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Surgical methods are recommended as the most effective treatment methods in Peyroni disease. Providing a good preoperative information in terms of postoperative penile shortening and curvature recurrence may increase patient satisfaction.

Özet

ÖzetAmaç: Penil eğriliğin en sık nedeni olan peyroni hastalığı için hala en etkili tedavi yöntemini cerrrahi müdahaleler oluşturmaktadır. Fonksiyonel ve kozmetik sonuçları olan peyroni cerrahisinde hasta memnuniyetine etki eden faktörleri araştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve yöntem: 2012-2019 yılları arasında peyroni hstalığı tanısı konulmuş ve peyroni cerrahisi önerilmiş hastaların kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. 1. Yıl kontrollerinde hastaların erektil kapasite, rezidüel / tekrarlayan penil deformite, penil uzunluk ve potansiyel komplikasyonlar açısından preoperatif kayıtları ile birlikte değerlendirildi ve memnuniyet düzeyleri ölçülerek etki eden faktörler araştırıldı. Bulgular: Plikasyon cerrahisi (Grup 1) geçiren 27 hasta, İnsizyon safen ven greft cerrahisi (Grup 2) geçiren 21 hasta saptandı. Grup 1'de hasta memnuniyet %83,33, grup 2'de %67,14 saptandı. Grup 2’de penil kısalma miktarı (2,71±1,41 cm) grup 1’e (1,14±0,91 cm) göre daha fazla gözlendi. Hastaların memnuniyetine etki eden parametreler incelendiğinde; penis boyu kısalmasıyla (p=0,036), cerrahi öncesi erektil disfonksiyon varlığını belirtmekle (rho-,375, p=0,009), plak varlığıyla (p=0,002), eşlik eden komorbid hastalık varlığıyla (p<0,001), şikayet tekrarı varlığıyla (p=0,006) hasta memnuniyeti arasında negatif korelasyon saptandı. Sonuç: Peyroni hastalığında cerrahi yöntemler en etkili tedavi yöntemleri olarak önerilmektedir. Hastaların postoperatif penil kısalma ve kurvatür rekürrensi açısından preoperatif iyi bir bilgilendirme yapılması hasta memnuniyetlerini arttırabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞER, A., ÇELEN, S., BÜTÜN, S., ÖZLÜLERDEN, Y., ALKIŞ, O., TOKTAŞ, C., TURAN, T. (2020). Factors affecting patient satisfaction in peyroni surgery. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 705–713. https://ajindex.com/articles/696471

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Sommer F, Schwarzer U, Wassmer G, Bloch W, Braun M, Klotz T. Epidemiology of Peyronie-s disease. Int J Impot Res 2002
  2. 14, 379–383. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900863 2- Trost LW, Gur S, Hellstrom WJ. Pharmacological management of Peyronie’s disease. Drugs 2007
  3. 67(4):527–545. DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200767040-00004 3- Chung E, Ralph D, Kagioglu A, Garaffa G, Shamsodini A, Bivalacqua T, et al. Evidence-Based Management Guidelines on Peyronie's Disease. J Sex Med 2016
  4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.04.062 4- Kadıoğlu A, Salabaş E, Özmez A, Ural AF, Yücel ÖB, Ortaç M, et al. Peyronie`s disease surgery: Surgical outcomes of 268 cases. Turk J Urol 2018
  5. 44(1):10-5. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2018.87405 5- Dibenedetti DB, Nguyen D, Zografos L, Ziemiecki R, Zhou X. A Population-Based Study of Peyronie's Disease: Prevalence and Treatment Patterns in the United States. Adv Urol 2011
  6. 282503. DOI: 10.1155/2011/282503 6- Smith JF, Waalsh TJ, Lue TF. Peyronie’s disease: a critical appraisal of current diagnosis and treatment. Int J Impot Res 2008
  7. DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2008.30 7- Talib RA, Ibrahim MA, Canguven O. Nonsurgical treatment options in Peyronie's Disease: 2016 update. Turk J Urol. 2016
  8. 42(4):217-223. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2016.40799 8- Mobley EM, Fuchs ME, Myers JB, Brant WO. Update on plication prodedures for Peyronie’s disease and other penile deformities. Ther Adv Urol 2012
  9. DOI: 10.1177/1756287212448224 9- Falcone M, Preto M, Cocci A, Garaffa G. Strategies and current practices for penile lengthening in severe Peyronie’s disease cases: a systematic review. Int J Impot Res. 2020
  10. 32(1):52-63. DOI: 10.1038/s41443-019-0189-9. 10- Pryor JP, Fitzpatrick JM. A new approach to the correction of penile deformity in Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 1979
  11. 622–3. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)56530-1 11- Licht MR, Lewis RW. Modified Nesbit procedure for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a comparative outcome analysis. J Urol 1997
  12. 158(2):460–3. 12- Syeed AH, Abbasi Z, Hargreave TB. Nesbit procedure for disabling Peyronie’s curvature: a median follow-up of 84 months. Urology 2003
  13. 61(5):999–1003. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02549-9 13- van der Horst C, Martinez Portillo FJ, Seif C, Melchior D, Stübinger H, Alken P, et al. Quality of life after surgical correction of penile deviation with the Schroeder-Essed plication. Aktuelle Urol. 2003
  14. 34(2):109-14. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-38907 14- Levine LA, Lenting EL: A surgical algorithm fort he treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J. U