Journals / Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Trade Openness and Economic Growth Nexus: The Case of BRICS

Ticari Dışa Açıklık ve Ekonomik Büyüme Bağlantısı: BRICS Örneği

Pages
38–61
Publication Date
2022-06-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings obtained as a result of the study: Despite the fact that there is a positive and statistically significant between the the effect of trade openness and exchange rate variables on economic growth during the period under consideration, the effect of foreign direct invesment variable on economic growth is not statistically significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In a world the spread and reflection of globalization are questioned, the relationship between trade openness and economic growth maintains its importance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the aim of the study is to investigate the effect of the degree of trade openness on economic growth in addition to the literature findings during the period 1996-2020 for the BRICS countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings obtained as a result of the study: Despite the fact that there is a positive and statistically significant between the the effect of trade openness and exchange rate variables on economic growth during the period under consideration, the effect of foreign direct invesment variable on economic growth is not statistically significant.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Ekonomik Büyüme · Ticari açıklık · Döviz kuru

Abstract

In a world the spread and reflection of globalization are questioned, the relationship between trade openness and economic growth maintains its importance. The fact that some of the studies questioning this relationship based on the differences in time and space from the past to the present findings that some are negative and some are positive, shows that there is no consensus on this issue. Accordingly, we think that determining whether there is a relationship between trade openness and economic growth for the BRICS sample, and if so, the direction of this relationship and explaining the reason for the differences found in other studies will contribute to the literature. In this context, the aim of the study is to investigate the effect of the degree of trade openness on economic growth in addition to the literature findings during the period 1996-2020 for the BRICS countries. The findings obtained as a result of the study: Despite the fact that there is a positive and statistically significant between the the effect of trade openness and exchange rate variables on economic growth during the period under consideration, the effect of foreign direct invesment variable on economic growth is not statistically significant.

Özet

Küreselleşmenin yayılma ve yansımasının sorgulandığı dünyada ticari açıklık ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi önemini korumaktadır. Geçmişten günümüze çeşitli zaman ve mekân farklılığına dayalı olarak bu ilişkiyi sorgulayan çalışmaların bazılarının negatif ve bazıları ise pozitif ilişki olduğuna dair bulgular sunmaları, bu hususta konsensüs sağlanamadığını göstermektedir. Bu doğrultuda BRICS örneklemi için ticari açıklık ve ekonomik büyüme arasında ilişki olup olmadığının ve varsa bu ilişkinin yönünün tespitiyle diğer araştırmalarda bulunan farklılıkların nedeninin açıklanmasının literatüre katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir. Bu çerçevede çalışmanın amacı, BRICS ülkeleri için 1996-2020 yılları arasında literatür bulgularına ek olarak ekonomik büyüme üzerinde ticari açıklık derecesinin etkisinin ortaya konmasıdır. Çalışmanın sonucunda elde edilen bulgular: Dışa açıklık oranı ve döviz kuru değişkenlerinin, incelenen dönem aralığında ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki anlamlı olmakla birlikte pozitif yönlü tesirine karşın doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar değişkeninin ekonomik büyüme üzerinde etkisinin istatiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığına dairdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YENİPAZARLI, A., CAMBAZOĞLU, B., BEGEÇ, E. (2022). Trade Openness and Economic Growth Nexus: The Case of BRICS. Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomic Studies, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 38–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/696160

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aslan, A., & Topcu, E. (2018). The Relationship between Export and Growth: Panel Data Evidence from Turkish Sectors. Economies, 6(2), 22. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/economies6020022
  2. Baldwin, R. E. (2004). Openness and Growth: What’s the Empirical Relationship? R. E. Baldwin and L. A. Winters (Edt.) In Challenges to Globalization: Analyzing the Economics (pp. 499-525). Chicago: University of Chicago Press Retrieved 25 February, 2022 from https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c9548/c9548.pdf
  3. Barro, R. J., & Sala-I-Martin, X. (1997).
  4. Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 2(1), 1–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40215930
  5. Bhagwati, J., & Srinivasan, T. N. (2002). Trade and Poverty in the Poor Countries. The American Economic Review, 92(2), 180–183. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3083398
  6. Bijarnia, B. S. (2013). Whither Global Economic Governance? The Emerging Role of BRICS: An Alternative. Indian Journal of Asian Affairs, 26(1/2), 75–92. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43550357
  7. Breusch, T. S. and A. R. Pagan (1980). The Lagrange multiplier testand its applications to model specification tests in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies 47, 239–53.
  8. Burange, L., Ranadive, R. R. & Karnik, N. N. (2013). Trade Openness and Economic Growth Nexus: A Case Study of BRICS. ISFIRE Working Paper Series, No.1. Retrieved 25 February, 2022 from https://ojsiire.com/index.php/isfirewps/issue/view/3/pdf_2
  9. Burange, L., Ranadive, R. R. & Karnik, N. N. (2015). Causality between Trade Openness and Economic Growth: Experience of India and China. ISFIRE Working Paper Series. No.7. Retrieved 25 February, 2022 from https://ojsiire.com/index.php/isfirewps/issue/view/19
  10. Busse, M. & Koeniger, J. (2012). Trade and Economic Growth: A Re-Examination of the Empirical Evidence. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2009939. Retrieved 25 February, 2022 from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2009939
  11. Cambazoğlu, B. (2019) Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler ve BRICS Ülkelerinin Karşılaştırmalı Makroekonomik Analizi (ss. 273-299), Eds. Aslı Yenipazarlı. Seçilmiş Konularla 21. Yüzyılda Dünya Ekonomisi, Ankara: Seçkin Kitabevi. ISBN: 978-975-02-5816-9 (10 puan) Cambazoğlu, B. (2020). Trade Protectionism: Pros and Cons. Ahu Coşkun Özer (Eds.), International Trade Policies in the Era of Globalization, (pp. 94-115). Hershey: IGI Global Publication. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-9566-3.ch005 Çevik, E. I., Atukeren, E. & Korkmaz, T. (2019). Trade Openness