Journals / Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

A Comprehensive Examination of Social Exclusion

Sosyal Dışlanma Olgusu Üzerine Genel Bir İnceleme

Pages
293–315
Publication Date
2019-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the effects of social exclusion on individuals and theoretical approaches that try to explain social exclusion were discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As a social species, people are born into groups and maintain to live as members of groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, inclusion in groups is a basic need in all human cultures (Baumeister and Leary, 1995).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the effects of social exclusion on individuals and theoretical approaches that try to explain social exclusion were discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal dışlanma · reddedilme · ait olma ihtiyacı

Abstract

As a social species, people are born into groups and maintain to live as members of groups. Therefore, inclusion in groups is a basic need in all human cultures (Baumeister and Leary, 1995). On the other hand, rejection by others is a common experience in social life. Social exclusion, eliciting the sense of being ignored, feeling invisible and rejected, leads to a series of behavioral, emotional, cognitive and physiological effects on humans. In this article, it is aimed to present a comprehensive examination of the social exclusion phenomenon based on research from social psychology. Firstly, in addition to the earliest studies in the field, contemporary literature has been taken into consideration and the phenomenon of exclusion has been conceptually and historically discussed. Then, the common methods which were used to give participants an experience of exclusion in the laboratory conditions are mentioned. Finally, the effects of social exclusion on individuals and theoretical approaches that try to explain social exclusion were discussed.

Özet

Sosyal bir tür olan insan, gruplar içerisine doğmakta ve belli grupların üyesi olarak yaşamını sürdürmektedir. Bu nedenle sosyal ilişkilere kabul edilmek ve gruplarda yer almak, tüm kültürlerde gözlemlenen temel bir motivasyon ve ihtiyaçtır (Baumeister ve Leary, 1995). Öte yandan, diğerleri tarafından kabul görmemek ve ait olma ihtiyacının karşılanmaması sosyal yaşamda sıklıkla karşımıza çıkan bir durumdur. Görmezden gelinme, yok sayılma, reddedilme kavramlarını içinde barındıran “sosyal dışlanma” bireylerin üzerinde bir dizi davranışsal, duygusal, bilişsel ve fizyolojik etkiye yol açmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, dışlanma olgusunu sosyal psikolojik açıdan ele alan araştırmalardan yola çıkılarak konuya dair kapsamlı bir inceleme sunmak amaçlanmıştır. Alandaki öncü çalışmalara ek olarak güncel literatür de göz önünde bulundurulmuş ve öncelikle dışlanma olgusu kavramsal ve tarihsel olarak ele alınmış, ardından deneysel çalışmalarda katılımcılara dışlanma deneyimi yaşatmak için kullanılan belli başlı yöntemlerden bahsedilmiş ve sosyal dışlanmanın bireyler üzerinde yarattığı etkiler ele alınmıştır. Son olarak dışlanma olgusunu açıklamaya çalışan teorik yaklaşımlardan söz edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOLAK, Ç., TEKÖZEL, M. (2019). A Comprehensive Examination of Social Exclusion. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 293–315. https://ajindex.com/articles/69566

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abayhan, Y., Yavuz, H., Ceylan, S., Kaya, A.G., Sahin, D., & Aydın, O. (2009). Brainstorming as a paradigm for studying ostracism: Experiments with brainstorming and cyberball paradigms. Sözlü bildiri, 11th European Congress of Psychology, Oslo, Norway. Abrams, D., Weick, M., Thomas, D., Colbe, H., & Franklin, K.M. (2011). On-line ostracism affects children differently from adolescents and adults. British Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 110-123.
  2. Aydin, N., Graupmann, V., Fischer, J., Frey, D., & Fischer, P. (2011). My role is my castle – The appeal of family roles after experiencing social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 981-986.
  3. Balliet, D., & Ferris, D.L. (2013). Ostracism and prosocial behavior: A social dilemma perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 298-308.
  4. Baumeister, R.F., & DeWall, C.N. (2005). The inner dimension of social exclusion. In K.D. Williams, J.P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The Social Outcast: Ostracism, Social Exclusion, Rejection, and Bullying (pp. 53-73). New York: Psychology Press.
  5. Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117 (3), 491-529.
  6. Baumeister, R.F., Brewer, L.E., Tice, D.M., & Twenge, J.M. (2007). Thwarting the need to belong: Understanding the interpersonal and inner effects of social exclusion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 506-520.
  7. Baumeister, R.F., DeWall, C.N., Ciarocco, N.J., & Twenge, J.M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 589-604.
  8. Baumeister, R.F., Twenge, J.M., & Nuss, C.K. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: Anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 817–827.
  9. Benenson, J.F., Hodgson, L., Heath, S., & Welch, P.J. (2008). Human sexual differences in the use of social ostracism as a competitive tactic. International Journal of Primatology, 29, 1019-1035.
  10. Benenson, J.F., Markovits, H., Thompson, M.E., & Wrangham, R.W. (2011). Under threat of social exclusion, females exclude more than males. Psychological Science, 22(4), 538-544.
  11. Bernstein, M.J., & Claypool, H.M. (2011). Social exclusion and pain sensitivity: Why exclusion sometimes hurts and sometimes numbs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 185-196.
  12. Bernstein, M.J., Sacco, D.F., Brown, C.M., Young, S.G.,