SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 16

CURRENT MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL TECHNIQUES IN NARROWED SPINAL CANAL

Seyit BAŞARSLAN
Cüneyt GÖÇMEZ
Pages
32–43
Publication Date
2015-03-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper will review the techniques of performing ipsilateral or bilateral decompressions using some microsurgical instruments (microscope, endoscope) and Kit (mild)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common condition in elderly patients and may lead to progressive back and leg pain, muscular weakness, sensory disturbance, and mainly problems with ambulation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Multiple studies suggest that surgical decompression is an effective therapy for patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper will review the techniques of performing ipsilateral or bilateral decompressions using some microsurgical instruments (microscope, endoscope) and Kit (mild)
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lumbar stenosis · spine · minimal invasive

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common condition in elderly patients and may lead to progressive back and leg pain, muscular weakness, sensory disturbance, and mainly problems with ambulation. Multiple studies suggest that surgical decompression is an effective therapy for patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis. Although traditional lumbar decompression is a time honored procedure, minimally invasive procedures are now available which can achieve the goals of decompression with many advantages such as less bleeding, smaller incisions, little muscle distraction and quicker patient recovery. This paper will review the techniques of performing ipsilateral or bilateral decompressions using some microsurgical instruments (microscope, endoscope) and Kit (mild)

Özet

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common condition in elderly patients and may lead to progressive back and leg pain, muscular weakness, sensory disturbance, and mainly problems with ambulation. Multiple studies suggest that surgical decompression is an effective therapy for patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis. Although traditional lumbar decompression is a time honored procedure, minimally invasive procedures are now available which can achieve the goals of decompression with many advantages such as less bleeding, smaller incisions, little muscle distraction and quicker patient recovery. This paper will review the techniques of performing ipsilateral or bilateral decompressions using some microsurgical instruments (microscope, endoscope) and Kit (mild).

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞARSLAN, S., GÖÇMEZ, C. (2015). CURRENT MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL TECHNIQUES IN NARROWED SPINAL CANAL. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 16, 32–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/692937

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. R. A. Deyo, D. C. Cherkin, J. D. Loeser, S. J. Bigos, and M. A. Ciol, “Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Series A, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 536–543, 1992.
  2. D. S. Rosen, J. E. O'Toole, K. M. Eichholz et al., “Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older,” Neurosurgery, vol., no. 3, pp. 503–509, 2007.
  3. Z. H. Arinzon, B. Fredman, E. Zohar et al., “Surgical management of H. Hurri, P. Slätis, J. Soini et al., “Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of long-term outcome 12 years after operative and conservative treatment,” Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 110–115, 1998. spinal stenosis: a comparison of immediate and long term outcome in two geriatric patient populations,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 273–279, 2003.
  4. B. Fredman, Z. Arinzon, E. Zohar et al., “Observations on the safety and efficacy of surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in geriatric patients,” European Spine Journal, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 571–574, 2002.
  5. J. N. Katz, G. Stucki, S. J. Lipson, A. H. Fossel, L. J. Grobler, and J. N. Weinstein, “Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis,” Spine, vol. 24, no. 21, pp. 2229–2233, - S. J. Atlas, R. B. Keller, D. Robson, R. A. Deyo, and D. E. Singer, “Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study,” Spine, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 556–562, 2000. F. Postacchini, “Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis,” Spine, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. –1047, 1999.
  6. L. Bresnahan, A. T. Ogden, R. N. Natarajan, and R. G. Fessler, “A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques,” Spine, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2009. F. Asgarzadie and L. T. Khoo, “Minimally invasive operative management for lumbar spinal stenosis: overview of early and long-term outcomes,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 387–399, 2007.
  7. S. Palmer, R. Turner, and R. Palmer, “Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 213–217, 2002.
  8. McCulloch JA, Young PH. Essentials of spinal microsurgery, Philadelphi