Journals / Mugla Journal of Science and Technology / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

A CASE STUDY OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COOPERATION

ÜNİVERSİTE-SANAYİ İŞBİRLİĞİ

Pages
89–95
Publication Date
2016-12-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results it can be said that Industry knows very little about opportunities and has little concern with cooperation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The goal of this study was to analyze the situation of the cooperation between University and Industry in Düzce, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There were 242 firms according to the registry of Düzce Chamber of Industry and Commerce.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results it can be said that Industry knows very little about opportunities and has little concern with cooperation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Üniversite-Sanayi işbirliği · Ağaç İşleri Endüstrisi · Mobilya Sanayisi

Abstract

The goal of this study was to analyze the situation of the cooperation between University and Industry in Düzce, Turkey. Target population of the study was the firms that related only woodworking industry. There were 242 firms according to the registry of Düzce Chamber of Industry and Commerce. But some of them were only the end product seller instead of manufacturer or supplier. Because of this reason, population of this study was determined as 154. And this was the only constraint of the study. 91 of 154 firms were surveyed by the face to face method with 41-question survey. According to the results it can be said that Industry knows very little about opportunities and has little concern with cooperation. Also, miscommunication may be the one of the main reason of weak cooperation. In this regard, Technology Faculties are able to strengthen this weak cooperation due to its on-site education syllabus.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Düzce’de üniversite sanayi işbirliğinin durumunu analiz etmektir. Bu çalışma kapsamında yalnızca ağaçişleri-mobilya endüstrisinde faaliyet gösteren firmalar hedef kitle olarak belirlenmiştir. Düzce Ticaret ve Sanayi Odası kayıtlarına göre 242 firma bu alanda faaliyet göstermektedir. Fakat bunlardan bazıları üretici ya da tedarikçi değil sadece nihai ürün satıcısıdır. Bu nedenle bu çalışmanın nihai popülasyonu 154 olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu husus çalışmanın yegâne kısıtı olarak düşünülebilir. 154 firmanın 97’si ile 41 sorudan oluşan bir anket kullanılarak yüz yüze görüşme tekniği ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma sonuçlarına göre endüstrinin fırsatlar hakkında çok az şey bildiği ya da neredeyse farkında olmadığı ve işbirliği ile ilgili çok duyarlı olmadıkları söylenebilir. İletişimsizlik ya da iletişim eksikliği bu zayıf işbirliğinin ana sebeplerinden biri olabilir. Bu doğrultuda, Teknoloji Fakültelerinin işyerinde eğitim müfredatı sayesinde bu zayıf işbirliğini güçlendirebilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CİRİTCİOĞLU, H. H., AYDIN, M., ŞENOL, S. (2016). A CASE STUDY OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COOPERATION. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 89–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/692083

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Zhang G, Sun Z, He Y, An S. 2010. Analysis of Industry-University-Research Institute Combination Intended for the Technical Innovation of Wood Processing Enterprises, Forestry Machinery and Woodworking Equipment, 2010-03.
  2. Congqin D, Changhong L. 2007. Comparative Study on Enterprises-Universities-Researches Cooperation Model in Typical Countries and Regions. Sci-Technology and Management, 45(5): 92-96.
  3. Lööf H, Broström A., “Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness?”, The Journal Technology Transfer, 33:73–90, 2008.
  4. Zheng L, Rongkai F, Weiguang W. 2008. Industry-University-Research Cooperative Innovation Mode Study Based on Industry Chain[J]. Science & Technology and Economy, 21(1): 22-25.
  5. Fontana R, Geuna A and Matt M., Firm size and openness: The driving force of university– industry collaboration. In: Caloghirou, Y., Constantelou, A. & Vonortas N. S. (Eds.), Knowledge flows in European industry: Mechanisms and policy implications. London: Routledge. 2005.
  6. Hall BH, Link AN, Scott JT. 2003. Universities as research partners. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 485–491. Jacobsson S. 2002. Universities and industrial transformation. An interpretative and selective literature study with a special emphasis on Sweden. Science and Public Policy, 29(5), 345–365. Etzkowitz H. 2003. Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of university-indusry-government relations. Social Science Information 42(3): 293-337. Machlup F. 1962. The Production and Disturbiion of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Shuilong T. 2011. Development and Evolution of Industry-University-Research Cooperative Innovation Mode in China, Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, São Paulo, vol.02, n.02, p.69 – 76. Harhoff D. 1999. Firm formation and regional spillovers. The Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 27–55.
  7. Hall BH, Link AN, Scott JT. 2001. Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: Evidence from the advanced technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 87-98.
  8. Zhangbao W, Yicai Z. 2000. Industry-University Cooperation: Mode, Trend, Problem and Solution[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 17(9):115-117.
  9. Yanyan L, Bing Y, Juan D. 2004. Industry-University-Research Cooperation Mode Classification and Selection Ideas[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, (10): 98-99.
  10. Caloghirou Y, Tsakanikas A, Vonortas NS. 2001. University-Industry Coopera