Administrative courts constitute a separate system vvhich includes the Council of State (Danıştay), the Military Administrative Court, the Court of Accounts and the subordinate administrative courts.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The traditions of Turkish law require that there should exist an independent branch of lavv under vvhich an individual could seek redress for an injustice committed by a public official or body.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This branch is Administrative Lavv, and as a general principle, ali cases governed by administrative lavv fail vvithin the competence of administrative courts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Administrative courts constitute a separate system vvhich includes the Council of State (Danıştay), the Military Administrative Court, the Court of Accounts and the subordinate administrative courts.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Implemetation · Helsinki Final Act · Turkish Court
Özet
The traditions of Turkish law require that there should exist an independent branch of lavv under vvhich an individual could seek redress for an injustice committed by a public official or body. This branch is Administrative Lavv, and as a general principle, ali cases governed by administrative lavv fail vvithin the competence of administrative courts. Administrative courts constitute a separate system vvhich includes the Council of State (Danıştay), the Military Administrative Court, the Court of Accounts and the subordinate administrative courts.
Aybay, R. (1978). Implemetation of the Helsinki Final Act by a Turkish Court. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, Sayı: 18, 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1501/Intrel_0000000190