Journals / Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 167 - Sayı: 167

Comparison of the results of the suppression of surface related multiple reflections by predictive deconvolution in pre- and post-stack in 2D marine seismic reflection data: a case study from the Sea of Marmara

Pages
51–64
Publication Date
2022-04-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering the data used in this study, which obtained from a shallow seabed section of the Sea of Marmara including slopped structures, it has been observed that the result obtained by applying the predictive deconvolution process to the pre-stack shot gathers are more successful than the other.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to suppress the multiple reflections from the multi-channel seismic reflection data, which collected on the profile M97-29 at the Sea of Marmara with the MTA Sismik-1 Vessel in 1997 by the General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA), both at the preand post-stack stages separately, by using predictive deconvolution and to compare both results.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The stack section obtained by applying predictive deconvolution to the pre-stack shot gathers, is compared with the stack section obtained by applying predictive deconvolution to the post-stack section, which has no predictive deconvolution application before stack.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering the data used in this study, which obtained from a shallow seabed section of the Sea of Marmara including slopped structures, it has been observed that the result obtained by applying the predictive deconvolution process to the pre-stack shot gathers are more successful than the other.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Predictive Deconvolution · Seismic Reflection · Data Processing

Abstract

This study aims to suppress the multiple reflections from the multi-channel seismic reflection data, which collected on the profile M97-29 at the Sea of Marmara with the MTA Sismik-1 Vessel in 1997 by the General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA), both at the preand post-stack stages separately, by using predictive deconvolution and to compare both results. The stack section obtained by applying predictive deconvolution to the pre-stack shot gathers, is compared with the stack section obtained by applying predictive deconvolution to the post-stack section, which has no predictive deconvolution application before stack. The multiple reflections are mostly suppressed in both sections, but the amplitudes of the primary reflections are much more noticeable and have much higher amplitudes on the stack section obtained by applying predictive deconvolution to the pre-stack shot gathers. Considering the data used in this study, which obtained from a shallow seabed section of the Sea of Marmara including slopped structures, it has been observed that the result obtained by applying the predictive deconvolution process to the pre-stack shot gathers are more successful than the other.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜGE, M. A., KANLI, A. İ. (2022). Comparison of the results of the suppression of surface related multiple reflections by predictive deconvolution in pre- and post-stack in 2D marine seismic reflection data: a case study from the Sea of Marmara. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, Cilt: 167 - Sayı: 167, 51–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/687127

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bitencourt, L. S., Castro, H. B. S., Fontes, P. H. L., Silva, M. G., Porsani, M. J. 2017. Singular value decomposition and multichannel predictive deconvolution applied to multiple attenuations of Jequitinhonha basin. 15th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society and EXPOGEF, 31 July - 03 August 2017,
  2. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 612-615.
  3. Carneiro, R. N. C., Leite, L. W. B., Vieira, W. W. S., Rufino, C. S. 2017. Predictive deconvolution of multiple free surfaces in marine seismic data. 15th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society and EXPOGEF, 31 July - 03 August 2017,
  4. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 598-602.
  5. Dondurur, D. 2018. Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data. Elsevier, 606. Düşünür, D. 2004. Orta Marmara Havzası’nın aktif tektonik yapısının deniz jeofiziği akustik yöntemleriyle araştırılması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 127 (unpublished). Ergintav, S., Demirbağ, E., Ediger, V., Saatçılar, R., İnan, S., Cankurtaranlar, A., Dikbaş and A., Baş, M. 2011. The structural framework of onshore and offshore Avcılar, Istanbul under the influence of the North Anatolian Fault. Geophysical Journal International 185(1), 93-105.
  6. Gibson, B., Larner, K. 1984. Predictive deconvolution and the zero-phase source. Geophysics 49(4), 379-397.
  7. Güney, R., Karslı, H., Dondurur, D. 2013. Ofset bağımlı önkestirim dekonvolüsyonu. Jeofizik 17, 3-12.
  8. Güney, R., Karslı, H., Dondurur, D. 2019. Optimum parameter selection in offset-dependent predictive deconvolution: testing on multichannel marine seismic data. Marine Geophysical Research 40, 601-617.
  9. İmren, C. 2003. Marmara Denizi faal tektonizmasının sismik yansıma verileri ile incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 203 (unpublished). İmren, C., Le Pichon, X., Rangin, C., Demirbağ, E., Ecevitoğlu, B., Görür, N. 2001. The North Anatolian Fault within the Sea of Marmara: a new interpretation based on multi-channel seismic and multi-beam bathymetry data. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 186(2), 143-158.
  10. Jian, X., Zhu, S. 2015. Predictive deconvolution for attenuation of multiple reflections in the marine seismic data processing. Journal of Coastal Research 73 (sp1), 310-314.
  11. Kurt, H., Yücesoy, E. 2009. Submarine structures in the Gulf of İzmit, based on multichannel seismic reflection and multibeam bathymetry. Marine Geophysical Researches 30(2), 73-84.
  12. Liu, J., Lu, W. 2008. An improved predictive deconvo