Journals / Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Using Case-Based Science Scenarios to Analyze Preservice Teachers’ Analytical Thinking Skills

Pages
867–883
Publication Date
2022-10-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be suggested that the science educators develop the designs to improve the analytical thinking skills of the candidates in the courses they conduct on the basis of the results of the research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Any science teacher must first acquire analytical thinking skills in order to give their students the ability to think analytically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This test consists of 20 case-based science scenarios in total from four different learning fields.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be suggested that the science educators develop the designs to improve the analytical thinking skills of the candidates in the courses they conduct on the basis of the results of the research.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:The case-based science scenarios · thinking skills · analytical thinking

Abstract

Any science teacher must first acquire analytical thinking skills in order to give their students the ability to think analytically. Therefore, the candidacy period is important for teachers to develop this skill and translate it into professional knowledge. Based on this idea, the current research aims to determine the ability of preservice science teachers to use analytical thinking skills. An analytical thinking test is used in the research carried out survey method. This test consists of 20 case-based science scenarios in total from four different learning fields. These scenarios are designed according to the analytical thinking skill dimensions of Marzano’s Taxonomy (analyzing errors, classifying, comparing, specifying, generalizing). Preservice science teachers (N=158) from two public universities have participated in the study. It is determined that the majority of preservice science teachers weakly use their analytical thinking skills. It is revealed that preservice science teachers have difficulties respectively in classification - specification - error analysis - generalization – comparison according to Marzano's taxonomy from most to least while solving scenarios. It can be suggested that the science educators develop the designs to improve the analytical thinking skills of the candidates in the courses they conduct on the basis of the results of the research.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, A. K., KALA, N. (2022). Using Case-Based Science Scenarios to Analyze Preservice Teachers’ Analytical Thinking Skills. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 867–883. https://ajindex.com/articles/686949

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. References Akkuş-Çakır, N. & Senemoğlu, N. (2016). Analytical thinking skills in higher education, Kastamonu Education Journal, 24(3), 1487-1502.
  2. Amer, A. (2005). Analytical Thinking, https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=VPgRk8gpc_oC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=analytical+thinking&ots=D73OnmHI2D&sig=31pYheSUmEKW1GwI4RXGUooBkmM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=analytical%20thinking&f=false, Accessed: 26-07-2019
  3. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airiasian, W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. London: Longman. Barker, V., & Millar, R., (1999). Students’ reasoning about basic chemical reactions: what changes occurduring a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 645-665.
  4. Behn, R. D., & Vaupel, J. W. (1976). Teaching analytical thinking. Policy Analysis, 2(4), 663-692.
  5. Bekdemir, M., Okur, M., & Gelen, S. (2010). The effects of 2005 elementary mathematics education curriculum on the elementary seventh grade students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge and skills, Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 12(2), 131-147.
  6. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E. J. Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educatıonal Objectıves: The Classification of Educational Goals. London: Longman. Cresswell, S. L. & Loughlin, W. A. (2017). A Case-Based Scenario with Interdisciplinary Guided-Inquiry in Chemistry and Biology: Experiences of First Year Forensic Science Students, Journal of Chemistry Education, 94(8), 1074–1082
  7. Chinedu, C. C., & Olabiyi, O. S. (2015). Strategies for improving higher order thinking skills in teaching and learning of design and technology education. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 7(2), 35–43.
  8. Dewey, R. A. (2007). Psychology: An introduction, [http://www.intropsych.com]. Accessed: 30.08.2018
  9. Eckman, M., & Frey, D. K. (2005). Using the Web CT NAFTA program to promote analytical thinking and global awareness competencies through a team approach. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 23(4), 278-289.
  10. Ennis, R. H. (1985). Goals for a critical thinking curriculum. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: Are source book for teaching thinking (pp. 54–57).
  11. Fakhrurrazi, F., Sajidan, S., & Karyanto, P. (2019). Analysis of students’ analytical thinking skills in responding to the development of the ındustrial revolution 4.0. In