Journals / Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

A Comparison between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity

Bazı odun kabuk ekstraktları arasında karşılaştırma: Anti-fungal aktivite olarak

Pages
502–508
Publication Date
2017-11-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study indicates that tree bark extracts have potential to use as wood preservatives.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AbstractAim of study: The need for eco-friendly and bio-soluble wood preservatives has increased recently.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Inhibition of fungal growth increased parallel with concentration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study indicates that tree bark extracts have potential to use as wood preservatives.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Antifungal aktivite · Kabuk ekstraktı · Odun koruma maddesi

Abstract

AbstractAim of study: The need for eco-friendly and bio-soluble wood preservatives has increased recently. In this study, antifungal effects of tree barks were researched. Area of study: The maritime (Pinus pinaster L.), iron (Casuarina equisetifolia L.), mimosa (Acacia mollissima L.), calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.), and fir (Abies nordmanniana) tree barks were used.Material and Methods: The the solution at two concentrations was prepared to the substance obtained with alcohol benzene extraction method from the tree bark according to TAPPI standard. The effectiveness of bark extracts was evaluated against brown-rot fungus; Coniophera puteana, and white-rot fungus; Trametes versicolor. Main results: This study indicates that tree bark extracts have potential to use as wood preservatives. Maritime pine and fir tree barks showed good resistance against T. versicolor more than C. puteana. On the contrary, iron and mimosa tree barks were more resistance against brown-rot fungus, C. puteana. Concentration is the most important factor for inhibition of fungal activity. Inhibition of fungal growth increased parallel with concentration. Research highlights: It is thought that the rich structure of the bark extract in terms of natural phenolic compounds could inhibit fungal activity. This study indicates that tree bark extracts have potential to use as wood preservatives.

Özet

Özet Çalışmanın amacı: Çevre dostu ve doğada çözünebilen odun koruma maddelerine olan ihtiyaç son yıllarda artmıştır. Bu çalışmada, ağaç kabuklarının antifungal etkileri incelenmiştir.Çalışma alanı: Sahil çamı (Pinus pinaster L.), demir (Casuarina equisetifolia L.), mimoza (Acacia mollissima L.) kızılçam (Pinus brutia Ten.), ve göknar (Abies nordmanniana) ağaç kabukları kullanılmıştır.Materyal ve Yöntem: TAPPI standardına göre alkol-benzen ekstraksiyonu sonucu elde edilen ekstrakların iki farklı konsantrasyonu hazırlanmıştır. Kabuk ekstraklarının etkinliği esmer çürüklük mantarı Coniophera puteana, ve beyaz çürüklük mantarı; Trametes versicolor’a karşı değerlendirilmiştir.Sonuçlar: Sahil çamı ve göknar ağaç kabuk ekstraktları T. Versicolor mantarına karşı, C. puteana mantarından daha fazla dayanım göstermiştir. Bunun aksine demir ve mimoza ağaç kabuk ekstraktları esmer çürüklük mantarı C. puteana mantarına karşı daha dayanıklıdır. Mantar aktivitesinin engellenmesinde konsantrasyon en önemli faktördür. Mantar gelişiminin durdurulması konsantrasyona paralel bir şekilde artmıştır. Araştırma vurguları: Doğal fenolik bileşikler bakımından zengin olan kabuk ekstraktlarının mantar aktivitesini engellediği düşünülmektedir. Ağaç kabuklarının odun koruma maddesi olarak kullanılabilme potansiyeline sahip olduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGENÇ, Ö., DURMAZ, S., YILDIZ, Ü. C., ERİŞİR, E. (2017). A Comparison between Some Wood Bark Extracts: Antifungal Activity. Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 502–508. https://ajindex.com/articles/685484

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Fradinho D.M., Neto C.P., Evtuguin D., Jorge F.C., Irle M.A., Gil M.H., Jesus J.P. 2002. Chemical characterization of bark and of alkaline bark extracts from maritime pine grown in Portugal. Industrial Crops and Products, 16, 23-32.
  2. Gao H., Shupe T.F., Eberhardt L., Hse C.Y. 2007. Antioxidant activity of extracts from the wood and bark of Port Orford cedar. J. Wood Sci, 53, 147-152.
  3. Hamburger M., Hostettmann K. 1991. Bioactivity in plants: The link between phytochemistry and medicine. Phytochemistry, 30, 3864-3874.
  4. Harun J., Labosky P. 1985. Antitermitic and antifungal properties of selected bark extractives. Wood and Fiber Science, 17 (3), 327-335.
  5. Jerez M., Selga A., Sineiro J., Torres J.L., Nùnez M.J. 2007. A comparison between bark extracts from Pinus pinaster and Pinus radiate: Antioxidant activity and procyanidin composition. Food Chemistry, 100, 439-444.
  6. Jiang G.G., Fang G.Z, Li L.L., Shi Z.X., Zhang Z.R. 2014. Study on antioxidant activity of catalyzed hydrogen degradation product of polymeric proanthocyanidins (LPPC) from Larixgmelinii bark. BioResources, 9 (1), 662-672.
  7. Kartal S.N., Hwang W.J., Imamura Y., Sekine Y. 2006. Effect of essential oil compounds and plant extracts on decay and termite resistance of wood. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 64 (6), 61-455
  8. Kirker G.T., Blodgett A.B., Arango R.A., Lebow P.K., Clausen C.A. 2013. The role of extractives in naturally durable wood species. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 82, 53-58.
  9. Kocaefe D., Saha S. 2012. Comparison of the protection effectiveness of acrylic polyurethane coatings containing bark extracts on three heat-treated North American wood species: Surface degradation. Applied Surface Science, 258, 5283-5290.
  10. Maoz M., Weitz I., Blumenfeil M., Freitag C., Morrell J.J. 2007. Antifungal activity of plant derived extracts against G. trabeum. Proceedings IRG Annual Meeting, IRG/WP 07-30433,
  11. Stockholm, Sweden. Mohan D., Shi J., Nicholas D.D., Pittman C.U., Steele PH., Cooper J.E. 2008. Fungicidal values of bio-oils and their lignin-rich fractions obtained from wood/bark fast pyrolysis. Chemosphere, 71 (3), 65-456.
  12. Mourant D., Yang D.Q., Lu X., Roy C. 2005. Anti-fungal properties of the pyroligneus liquors from the pyrolysis of softwood bark. Wood Fiber and Technology, 37 (3), 542-548.
  13. Nemli G., Gezer E.D., Yıldız S., Temiz A., Aydın A. 2006. Evaluation of mechanical, physical properties and decay resistance of particleboard made from particles impregnation with Pinusbrutia bark e