Journals / Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Teachers in identification of gifted students: adaptation of an observation form

Pages
227–241
Publication Date
2022-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Analysis results indicate that Observation Forms are valid, reliable and compatible with Social Skills Assessment Scale, Marmara Primary School Readiness Scale and Denver II Developmental Screening Test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The first stage in identification of gifted students is the nomination step.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The goal of this study is to assist teachers in identification and nomination of 5-9 year-old gifted students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Analysis results indicate that Observation Forms are valid, reliable and compatible with Social Skills Assessment Scale, Marmara Primary School Readiness Scale and Denver II Developmental Screening Test.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Teacher · potential · nomination

Abstract

The first stage in identification of gifted students is the nomination step. Any mistake that teachers might make in nomination process might result in failure to identify gifted students or deprivation of relevant support that their skills require. Due to the quite detailed and long-term nature of teacher observations of children in recent years, it has been emphasized that teacher observation and resulting nomination process are very important in developing teacher observation scales and identifying gifted students. The goal of this study is to assist teachers in identification and nomination of 5-9 year-old gifted students. Another goal of the study is to test validity and reliability of Teacher’s Observation of Potential in Students Form, which is considered to be effective in selecting gifted students. The study was planned and patterned according to relational and methodological research type. Study data were collected from 179 teachers and 1252 5-9 year-old students in government preschools and primary schools affiliated with Directorate of National Education in Kırklareli City Centre, Lüleburgaz and Babaeski districts. Analysis results indicate that Observation Forms are valid, reliable and compatible with Social Skills Assessment Scale, Marmara Primary School Readiness Scale and Denver II Developmental Screening Test. It has been concluded that all the students nominated by means of Teacher’s Observation of Potential in Students Form passed the entrance test to Science, Art and Education Centre. Study results indicate that Teacher’s Observation of Potential in Students Form might be effectively used by teachers to nominate gifted students. As Teacher’s Observation of Potential in Students Form is capable of meeting the psychometric conditions, it might also be added that the form is valid and reliable.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTEN, S., AHMETOĞLU, E. (2022). Teachers in identification of gifted students: adaptation of an observation form. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 227–241. https://ajindex.com/articles/681167

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akar, İ., ve Uluman, M. (2013). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin üstün yetenekli öğrencileri doğru aday gösterme durumları. Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(3), 199-205.
  2. Aiken, C. E. (2012). A case study approach to examine gıfted children’s perceptıons of frıendshıp and play and their ımpact on the development of self. college of education and behavioral sciences school of teacher education educational studies. (Unpublished Doctorate Dessertation). The Graduate School. Unıversıty of Northern Colarado, USA. Al-Hroub, A. (2013). Multidimensional model for the identification of gifted children with learning disabilities. Gifted and Talented International, 28, 51–69.
  3. Al-Hroub, A. (2014). Identification of dual-exceptional learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science Journal, 116, 63–73.
  4. Akar, İ. ve Akar Ş.Ş. (2011). İlköğretim Okullarında Görev Yapmakta Olan Öğretmenlerin Üstün Yetenek Kavramı Hakkında ki Görüşleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 20(2), 423-436.
  5. Akçamete, G., ve Avcıoğlu, H. (2004). Sosyal Becerileri Değerlendirme Ölçeğinin (7-12 Yaş) Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 63-77. https://toad.halileksi.net/olcek/sosyal-becerileri-degerlendirme-olcegi
  6. Ayre, C., & Scally A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47 (1), 79–86. doı: 10.1177/0748175613513808. Bolat, Y. (2019). Öğretmenlerin Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Özelliklerine Yönelik Farkındalık Düzeylerinin Farklı Değişkenler Acısından İncelenmesi. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(30), 25-41. http://bilgikasifi.com/makale/Yildirim_2013.pdf
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. (2010). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2010.
  8. Coleman, M.R., ve Coltrane, S.S. (2010). Science Literature Connections. Council for Exceptional Children, 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 1000, Arlington, VA 22202.Printed in the United Stades of America. Coleman, M.R., & Job, J. (2014). Science Nonfiction Connections.Council for Exceptional Children All rights reserved.2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 1000. Arligton, VA 22202. Printed in the United Stades of America Coleman, M.R. at al. (2015).Twenty-Five Years of Research on the Lived Experience of Being Gifted in School: Capturing the Students’ Voices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(4) 358–376.Sage. Coleman, M.R. (2016). Reco