Journals / Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

A test for identification of math talent: developing a three-tier number sense test

Pages
273–290
Publication Date
2022-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

From the results of the analysis, it can be considered that the developed test is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to determine the number sense levels of the students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Solving math problems requires inferential thinking skills, improved number sense, problem-solving strategies, deductive reasoning and computational skills.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mathematically talented students often use advanced number sense strategies to get the fastest and most accurate result.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:From the results of the analysis, it can be considered that the developed test is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to determine the number sense levels of the students.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Three tier test · number sense · secondary school student

Abstract

Solving math problems requires inferential thinking skills, improved number sense, problem-solving strategies, deductive reasoning and computational skills. Mathematically talented students often use advanced number sense strategies to get the fastest and most accurate result. Although the existence of the number sense is known, it is difficult to describe it concretely. To materialize the intangible concept of number sense, a three-tier number sense test for secondary school students was developed and validated in this study. The developed test was carried out to 499 students studying in middle school in İzmir in Turkey. The first tier of the test consists of 25 multiple-choice mathematics questions. The second tier consists of the reason tier, which includes responses to the questions in the first tier (number sense-based, rule-based, misconception and guesswork). The third tier includes the confidence question, which measures the belief in the correctness of the response given to the question. The reliability of the test was calculated as .74 with the KR-20 formula. From the results of the analysis, it can be considered that the developed test is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to determine the number sense levels of the students.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNALI, S. D. (2022). A test for identification of math talent: developing a three-tier number sense test. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 273–290. https://ajindex.com/articles/681165

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Artut, P. D., & Er, Z. (2022, February). Investigation of number sense strategies used by 5th grade gifted students in Turkey. Twelfth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12), Feb 2022,
  2. Bozen-Bolzano, Italy. Baroody, A. J., & Gatzke, M. R. (1991). The estimation of set size by potentially gifted kindergarten-age children. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(1), 59–68.
  3. Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 333-339.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2010). Scientific research methods. Ankara:
  5. PegemA Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and application of a three‐tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students’ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939-961.
  6. Çekirdekçi, S., Şengül, S., & Doğan, M. C. (2016). 4. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Sayı Hissi İle Matematik Başarıları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi (Examining the relationship between number sense and mathematics achievement of the 4th grade students). Qualitative Studies, 11(4), 48-66.
  7. Chinn, S., J. ve Ashcroft, J. R. (1993). Mathematics for dyslexics. London: WhulT Publishers Ltd. Dehaene, S. (2001). Précis of the number sense. Mind and Language, 16(1), 16-36.
  8. Faulkner, V. N., & Cain, C. (2009). The components of number sense: An instructional model for teachers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 41(5), 24-30.
  9. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books Inc. Geary, D. C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children's cognition: Implications for mathematical development and instruction. American Psychologist, 50(1), 24. Gersten, R., & Chard, D. (1999). Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 18-28.
  10. Harling, P., & Roberts, T. (1988). Primary mathematics schemes. London: Hodder and Stoughton. Howden, H. (1989). Teaching number sense. The Arithmetic Teacher, 36(6), 6-11.
  11. Hrich, N., Lazaar, M., & Khaldi, M. (2019). Improving cognitive decision-making into adaptive educational systems through a diagnosis tool based on the competency approach. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., 14(7), 226-235.
  12. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Locuniak, M. N., & Ramineni, C. (2007). Predicting first‐grade math achievement from developm