Journals / Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine / 2018 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4

Changing rates for the induction of labor over the last five decades in a tertiary center

Pages
95–100
Publication Date
2019-11-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The frequency of labor induction has increased at our clinic with application at earlier gestational weeks and there have been higher induction failure rates over the decades.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to evaluate the changing rates for induction of labor, induction failure and obstetric characteristics of patients over the decades in a tertiary center.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The cases were divided into five groups: Group 1 (1976, n = 62), group 2 (1986, n = 104), group 3 (1996, n = 81), group 4 (2006, n=120) and group 5 (2016, n = 379).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The frequency of labor induction has increased at our clinic with application at earlier gestational weeks and there have been higher induction failure rates over the decades.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Cesarean section · Induction of labor · induction failure

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the changing rates for induction of labor, induction failure and obstetric characteristics of patients over the decades in a tertiary center. The data on labor inductions were retrospectively evaluated. The cases were divided into five groups: Group 1 (1976, n = 62), group 2 (1986, n = 104), group 3 (1996, n = 81), group 4 (2006, n=120) and group 5 (2016, n = 379). The rates of the induction cases, deliveries with labor induction among deliveries at ≥37th gestational week, primiparous induction cases, induction failure, the mean maternal age, gestational week at birth and birth weight were compared between the groups. The percentages of induction cases among the total number of deliveries for each year were 2.3% in group 1, 4.3% in group 2, 4.6% in group 3, 6.9% in group 4 and 20.2% in group 5, respectively (p<0.001). The rates of labor induction for deliveries at ≥ 37th gestational week were 2.4% in group 1, 4.7% in group 2, 5.4% in group 3, 8.5% in group 4 and 22.1% in group 5, respectively (p<0.001). Statistically significant differences were found between the groups for the number of primiparous induction cases, the rate of induction failure, mean maternal age, gestational week at birth and birth weight (p values were <0.001 for all). The frequency of labor induction has increased at our clinic with application at earlier gestational weeks and there have been higher induction failure rates over the decades.

🔖

Cite This Article

TANACAN, A., CAGAN, M., BEKSAC, M. S. (2019). Changing rates for the induction of labor over the last five decades in a tertiary center. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4, 95–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/678232

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Sağlık Bakanlığı ve Bağlı Kuruluşların teşkilat ve Görevleri Hakkında Kanun hükmünde Kararname ile Bazı Kanun ve Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamelerde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun. Resmi Gazete, 28351. 2009. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol, 114, 386-97. 2013. ACOG committee opinion no. 561: Nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries. Obstet Gynecol, 121, 911-5.
  2. ALFIREVIC, Z., KEENEY, E., DOWSWELL, T., WELTON, N., MEDLEY, N., DIAS, S., JONES, L. & CALDWELL, D. 2017. Methods to Induce Labour: A Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis. Obstetric anesthesia digest, 37, 145-146.
  3. BATTISTA, L., CHUNG, J. H., LAGREW, D. C. & WING, D. A. 2007. Complications of labor induction among multiparous women in a community-based hospital system. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 197, 241. e1-241. e7. BEKSAC, M. S., TANACAN, A., BACAK, H. O. & LEBLEBICIOGLU, K. 2018. Computerized prediction system for the route of delivery (vaginal birth versus cesarean section). Journal of perinatal medicine. BETRÁN, A. P., YE, J., MOLLER, A.-B., ZHANG, J., GÜLMEZOGLU, A. M. & TORLONI, M. R. 2016. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PloS one, 11, e0148343. CANDA, T., DEMIR, N. & SEZER, O. 2010. Comparison of Two Methods in Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women with Unfavorable Cervix at Term: Oxytocin Alone Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Slow-Release System (Propess®)+ Oxytocin. Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, 16. CAUGHEY, A. B., SUNDARAM, V., KAIMAL, A. J., GIENGER, A., CHENG, Y. W., MCDONALD, K. M., SHAFFER, B. L., OWENS, D. K. & BRAVATA, D. M. 2009. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Annals of internal medicine, 151, 252-263.
  4. CLARK, S. L., MILLER, D. D., BELFORT, M. A., DILDY, G. A., FRYE, D. K. & MEYERS, J. A. 2009. Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 200, 156. e1-156. e4. CRANE, J. M. 2006. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 49, 573-584.
  5. DIETZ, P. M., RIZZO, J. H., ENGLAND, L. J., CALLAGHAN, W. M., VESCO, K. K., BRUCE, F. C., BULKLEY, J. E., SHARMA, A. J. & HORNBROOK, M. C. 2012. Early term delivery and health care utilization in the first year of life. The Journal of pediatrics, 161, 234-239. e1. EHRENTHAL, D. B., HOFFMAN