SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

The Role of Bystander Effect on Teamwork Dysfunctioning

Takım Çalışmasının İşlevsizleşmesinde İzleyici Etkisinin Rolü

Emre ERBAŞ
Nilüfer ŞAHİN PERÇİN
Pages
455–467
Publication Date
2015-01-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Bystander Effect, Teamwork, Food-Beverage Organizations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AbstractIn this study, it is aimed to cover a conceptual background of the bystander effect which is limited in Turkish literature and to investigate whether the bystander effect plays a role on the dysfunctioning of teams in organizations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to results of the analysis, it is determined that (i) bystander effect is significantly and negatively correlated with all dimensions of the teamwork dysfunctioning, (ii) from these dimensions, the turst dimension is the one mostly affectd by bystander effect and (iii) the inattention to results dimension appeared to be the most prominent one among the other four dimensions of teamwork dysfunctioning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Bystander Effect, Teamwork, Food-Beverage Organizations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İzleyici Etkisi · Takım Çalışması · Yiyecek-İçecek İşletmeleri

Abstract

AbstractIn this study, it is aimed to cover a conceptual background of the bystander effect which is limited in Turkish literature and to investigate whether the bystander effect plays a role on the dysfunctioning of teams in organizations. To realize the purpose of the study, a research is conducted on the food-beverage industry employee in Kayseri. According to results of the analysis, it is determined that (i) bystander effect is significantly and negatively correlated with all dimensions of the teamwork dysfunctioning, (ii) from these dimensions, the turst dimension is the one mostly affectd by bystander effect and (iii) the inattention to results dimension appeared to be the most prominent one among the other four dimensions of teamwork dysfunctioning. In this context, some suggestions, required to be taken into account by the managers and related decision makers, have been made. Keywords: Bystander Effect, Teamwork, Food-Beverage Organizations.

Özet

ÖzBu çalışmada, işletmelerde özellikle ulusal yazında kısıtlı bir şekilde değinilen “izleyici etkisi (bystander effect)” ve izleyici etkisinin örgütlerdeki takım çalışmasının aksamasındaki rolünün araştırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amacı gerçekleştirmek için Kayseri’de faaliyet gösteren yiyecek-içecek endüstrisi çalışanları üzerinde araştırma yapılmıştır. Analizler sonucunda (i) izleyici etkisinin takım çalışmasının işlevsizleşmesinde etkili olan boyutların tamamıyla negatif ilişkisi olduğu, (ii) bu boyutlardan en çok güven boyutuna etki ettiği ve (iii) takım çalışmasının işlevsizleşmesinde en çok sonuçları dikkate almama boyutunun ön plana çıktığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu çıktılar bağlamında ise sektördeki yöneticilere ve ilgili karar alıcılara yol gösterici bilgiler sunulması hedeflenmiştir.Anahtar Kelimeler: İzleyici Etkisi, Takım Çalışması, Yiyecek-İçecek İşletmeleri.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERBAŞ, E., PERÇİN, N. Ş. (2015). The Role of Bystander Effect on Teamwork Dysfunctioning. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 455–467. https://ajindex.com/articles/67729

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abbate, C. S., Ruggieri, S. ve Boca, S. (2013). The effect of prosocial priming in the presence of bystanders. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153 (5): 619-622.
  2. Alicke, M. D. ve Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20 (1): 1-48.
  3. Bateman, B., Wilson, F. C. ve Bingham, D. (2002). Team effectivenes-development of an audit questionnaire. Journal of Management Development, 21 (3): 215-226.
  4. Bertland, A. (2009). Virtue ethics in business and the capabilities approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 84: 25-32.
  5. Chen, G., Tjosvold, D. ve Liu, C. (2006). Cooperative goals, leader people and productivity values: Their contribution to top management teams in China. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (5): 1177-1200.
  6. Darley, J. M., ve Latane, B. (1968). Bystander interventation in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8 (4): 377-383. D’cruz, P. ve Noronha, E. (2011). The limits to workplace friendship managerialist HRM and bystander behaviour in the context of workplace bullying. Employee Relations, 33 (3): 269-288.
  7. Dechurch, L. A. ve Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (1): 32-53.
  8. Fredricks, S., Ramsey, M. ve Hornett, A. (2010). Kinship and bystander effect: The role of others in ethical decisions. Journal of Religion and Business Ethics, 2 (1): 1-22.
  9. Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K., Moskowitz, G. B. ve Darley, J. M. (2002). Crowdedminds: The implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (4): 843-853.
  10. Gard, G., Lindstörm, K. ve Dallner, M. (2003). Towards a learning organization: The introduction of a client-centered team-based organization in administrative surveying work. Applied Ergonomics, 34 (2): 97-105.
  11. Gerstein, M. S. ve Shaw, R. B. (2006, Autumn). “The case against organizational bystanders”, Princeton Management Consulting Group (e-journal), 2006 (1-12): http://princetonmc.com/wp-content/uploads/Organizational Bystanders-7-06.pdf, (26.11.2013).
  12. Grantham, T. C. (2011). New directions for gifted black males suffering from bystander effects: A call for upstanders. Reoper Review, 33 (4): 263-272.
  13. Hamburger, M. E., Basile, K. C. ve Vivolo, A. M. (2011). Measuring bullying victimization, perpetration, and bystander experiences: A compendium of assessment tools. Atlanta: GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, N