Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADING VOLUME AND RETURNS IN BORSA ISTANBUL

BORSA İSTANBUL’DA PAY SENEDİ GETİRİLERİ İLE İŞLEM HACMİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Pages
11–30
Publication Date
2016-04-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to verify the results of regression analysis, the VAR Model are also analysed and the results show that the price movements affect the trading volume.Keywords: Return, Volume, Borsa Istanbul, Granger Causality Test, Vector Autoregression Model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper investigates the stock price-volume relation in Borsa Istanbul for the period 2000/01-2014/06.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is documented a dynamic and contemporaneous relation between volume and return and return volatility as well at 5 % significance level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to verify the results of regression analysis, the VAR Model are also analysed and the results show that the price movements affect the trading volume.Keywords: Return, Volume, Borsa Istanbul, Granger Causality Test, Vector Autoregression Model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper investigates the stock price-volume relation in Borsa Istanbul for the period 2000/01-2014/06. Regression analysis, Granger Causality Test, Johansen Cointegration Test and VAR Model are applied by using daily index data. It is documented a dynamic and contemporaneous relation between volume and return and return volatility as well at 5 % significance level. In this study, it is found that there is a one-way causality between trading volume and return. In order to verify the results of regression analysis, the VAR Model are also analysed and the results show that the price movements affect the trading volume.Keywords: Return, Volume, Borsa Istanbul, Granger Causality Test, Vector Autoregression Model.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Borsa İstanbul’da pay senedi fiyatlarıyla işlem hacmi arasındaki ilişki 2000/01-2014/06 dönemi için incelenmiştir. Günlük işlem hacmi ile endeks verilerinin kullanıldığı araştırmada regresyon analizinin ve Granger nedensellik testinin yanı sıra Johansen Eşbütünleşme analizi ile VAR Modeli uygulanmıştır. İncelenen dönem için %5 anlamlılık düzeyinde işlem hacmi ve getiri ile getiri oynaklığı arasında eşanlı ve dinamik bir ilişki bulunmuş, fiyat değişimlerinin işlem hacimlerini etkilediği gözlemlenmiştir. Granger nedensellik testi sonuçlarına göre ise fiyat ve hacim hareketleri arasındaki ilişki tek yönlü olup, yönü fiyattan hacme doğrudur. Regresyon analiz sonuçlarını doğrulama için kurulan VAR (Vector Autoregression Model) modelinde de benzer sonuçlar gözlemlenmiş, fiyat hareketlerinin işlem hacimlerinde etkili olduğu görülmüştür. Anahtar Kelimeler: Getiri, Hacim, Borsa İstanbul, Granger Nedensellik Testi, VAR Modeli.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEVİKCAN, G., TAŞ, O., TOKMAKÇIOĞLU, K. (2016). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRADING VOLUME AND RETURNS IN BORSA ISTANBUL. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 11–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/67690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahmed, H. J. A., Hassan, A. ve Nasir, A. M. D. (2005). The relationship between trading volume, volatility and stock market returns: A test of mixed distribution hypothesis for a pre and post crisis on Kuala Lumpur stock exchange. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 3: 146-158.
  2. Badhani, K. N. (2005). Stock price-volume causality at index level. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=874914, (02.09.2014).
  3. Acar Boyacıoğlu, M., Güvenek, B. ve Alptekin, V. (2010). Getiri volatilitesi ile işlem hacmi arasındaki ilişki. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (48): 200-217.
  4. Chuang, W., Liu, H. H. ve Susmel, R. (2012). The bivariate GARCH approach to investigating the relation between stock returns, trading volume, and return volatility. Global Finance Journal, 23 (1): 1-15.
  5. Chen, G-m., Firth, M. ve Rui, O. M. (2001). The dynamic relation between stock returns, trading volume and volatility. Financial Review, 36 (3): 153-174.
  6. Clark, P. K. (1973). A subordinated stochastic process model with finite variance for speculative prices. Econometrica, 41 (1): 135-155.
  7. Clark, J. ve Berko, E. (1997). Foreign investment fluctuations and emerging market stock returns: The case of Mexico. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Publishing No: 24. Copeland, T. E. (1976). A model of asset trading under the assumption of sequential information arrival. The Journal of Finance, 31 (4): 1149-1168.
  8. Çukur, S., Gümrah, Ü. ve Üstün Gümrah, M. (2012). İstanbul Menkul Kıymetler Borsasında hisse senedi getirileri ve işlem hacmi ilişkisi. Niğde Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 5 (1): 20-35.
  9. Darrat, A. F., Rahman, S. ve Zhong, M. (2003). Intraday trading volume and return volatility of the DJIA stocks: A note. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27 (10): 2035-2043.
  10. Deo, M., Srinivasan, K. ve Devanadhen, K. (2008). The empirical relationship between stock returns, trading volume and volatility: Evidence from select Asia-Pacific stock market. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 12: 58-68.
  11. Darwish, M. (2012). Testing the contemporaneous and causal relationship between trading volume and return in the palestine exchange. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4 (4): 182-192.
  12. Epps, T. W. (1975). Security price changes and transaction volumes: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 65 (4): 586-597.
  13. Harris, L. (1986). A transaction data study of weekly and intraday patterns in stock returns. Jou