Journals / Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Teaching practices and evaluation with distance education of gifted students

Pages
411–434
Publication Date
2022-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the present study showed that education programs can be rearranged and made suitable for distance education for the emergent transitions to distance education that emerged with the Covid-19 pandemic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is known that gifted individuals who receive education in Science and Art Centers (SACs) in Turkiye have problems in reaching different educations in accordance with their individual competencies .
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group of the research consisted of 40 gifted students and 40 parents of these students in three SACs in Turkiye.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the present study showed that education programs can be rearranged and made suitable for distance education for the emergent transitions to distance education that emerged with the Covid-19 pandemic.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Distance learning · Gifted children · Online education

Abstract

It is known that gifted individuals who receive education in Science and Art Centers (SACs) in Turkiye have problems in reaching different educations in accordance with their individual competencies . This study aimed to determine the expectations of gifted students towards distance education, to show that this training can be given with the distance education method after the courses offered through distance education, and to develop an alternative way for the future. Explanatory sequential design, one of the mixed research types in which quantitative and qualitative research designs are used together, was employed in the research. The study group of the research consisted of 40 gifted students and 40 parents of these students in three SACs in Turkiye. The quantitative data of the study were analyzed by using the SPSS program. Quantitative data of the study were obtained with a "10-items student online learning expectations form and 5-items parent evaluation form". Qualitative data of the study were obtained with an 8-items student self-evaluation form. In the research, 4 weeks of distance education were given to the students; "Astronomy, Thinking Skills, Teaching Mathematics with Origami, Robotic Coding, Intelligence Games and Values Education" lessons were explained, and the data obtained at the end of the application were analyzed and interpreted with the MAXQDA program. As a result, it is revealed that gifted students in SACs are quite satisfied with the distance education training within this study's scope. In addition, the present study showed that education programs can be rearranged and made suitable for distance education for the emergent transitions to distance education that emerged with the Covid-19 pandemic.

🔖

Cite This Article

GELEN, İ., KAÇAN, A. (2022). Teaching practices and evaluation with distance education of gifted students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 411–434. https://ajindex.com/articles/676753

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. and Demirel, F. (2008). Scientific research methods (14th Edition). Ankara:
  2. Pegem Publications Creswell, J. W., and Plano Clark, V. L. (2014). Mixed methods research design and conduct. Yüksel Dede and Selçuk Beşir Demir (translator.), Ankara:
  3. Anı Publishing Delcker, J. and Ifenthaler, D. (2020). Teachers’ perspective on school development at German vocational schools during the Covid-19 pandemic, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 125-139.
  4. Delibay, S. (2017). Science and Art Center Exam – SAC, https://suleymandelibay.blogspot.com.tr/2017/11/bilim-sanat-merkezi-sinavi-SAC.html, Date of access: 12.02.2022.
  5. Ewing, L.A. and Cooper, H.B. (2021). Technology-enabled remote learning during COVID-19: perspectives of Australian teachers, students and parents, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30 (1). 41-57.
  6. George, D., and Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, Boston: Pearson. Händel, M., Stephan, M., Zikuda, M.G., Kopp, B., Bedenlier, S. and Ziegler, A.(2020). Digital readiness and its effects on higher education students’ socio-emotional perceptions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education.1-13.
  7. Kabapınar, F. (2003). Differences of a scale that can be used to measure misconceptions from a scale that aims to measure knowledge-comprehension level. Educational Management in Theory and Practice, 35, 398-417.
  8. Kaçan, A. and Gelen, İ. (2020). An overview of distance education programs in Turkey. International Journal of Education Science and Technology, 6(1). 1-21.
  9. Karasar, N. (2002). Scientific research method. Ankara:
  10. Nobel Publishing. Lee, K., Fanguy, M., Lu, X. S. and Bligh, B. (2021). Student learning during covid-19: ıt was not as bad as we feared, Distance Education, 42(1), 164-172.
  11. Leontyeva, I. A. (2018). Modern Distance Learning Technologies in Higher Education: Introduction Problems. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10) 1-8
  12. Merriam, S. B. (2013). A guide to qualitative research design and practice. Selahattin Turan (Trans. Edt.). Ankara:
  13. Nobel Academic Publishing. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 2.Edition.
  14. Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: beyond no significant difference and future horizons. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,11(2). Özdamar, K. (1999). Statistical da