SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Gifted students' value perceptions: differentiation to socio-demographic variables

Adem BELDAĞ
Pages
503–521
Publication Date
2022-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In light of the study results, it is recommended to include more values education practices in the contents taught at SACs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In Turkiye, Science and Art Centers (SACs) operate affiliated to the Ministry of National Education (MoNE) in order to develop individual talents and raise awareness of gifted students in preschool, primary school, secondary school and high school without disrupting their regular schooling.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample consists of 712 students attending SACs at 14 different provinces determined with the maximum diversity sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In light of the study results, it is recommended to include more values education practices in the contents taught at SACs.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Gifted individual · gifted students · Perceptions for the Values Scale

Abstract

In Turkiye, Science and Art Centers (SACs) operate affiliated to the Ministry of National Education (MoNE) in order to develop individual talents and raise awareness of gifted students in preschool, primary school, secondary school and high school without disrupting their regular schooling. It is of great importance for not only the individual happiness of gifted children but also for the entire society to identify them at an early age and educate them as required by their personal abilities. The aim of this study is to examine the value perceptions of gifted students studying at SACs against selected variables. It is a survey research designs. The study sample consists of 712 students attending SACs at 14 different provinces determined with the maximum diversity sampling method. The data were collected by using the “Perceptions for Values Scale” developed by Beldağ (2012) comprised of seven sub-dimensions. Data analysis was performed by applying t-test and One-Way Analysis of Variance. As a result, the variables of gender, mother's education level, grade level, TV program(s) watched, and interests (hobbies) were found to affect value acquisition of gifted students. In light of the study results, it is recommended to include more values education practices in the contents taught at SACs.

🔖

Cite This Article

BELDAĞ, A. (2022). Gifted students' value perceptions: differentiation to socio-demographic variables. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 503–521. https://ajindex.com/articles/676742

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Avcu, Y. E., & Yaman, Y. (2022). Effectiveness of the differentiated instructional design for value education of gifted: A mixed study. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 9(1), 1-23.
  2. Ayverdi, L. (2021). Investigation of environmental values of gifted and talented students in terms of different variables. Anatolian Journal of Teacher, 5 (2), 341-361. Doi: 10.35346/aod.970941 Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş amos uygulamaları. İstanbul:
  3. Ezgi Kitabevi.
  4. Beldağ, A. (2012). The examination of acquirement level of values in social studies lesson elementary 7th grade in terms of different variables: Sample for the province Erzurum. Atatürk University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Erzurum. Berkowitz, M. W. & Hoppe, M. A. (2009). Character education and gifted children. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 131-142.
  5. Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., & Oh, S. (2017). Describing the status of programs for the gifted: A call for action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 20-49. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686215
  6. Camcı, S. (2012). Üstün zekalı ve yeteneklilerde cinsiyet farklılığı. HAYEF Journal of Education, 8 (2), 105-117.
  7. Cash, T. N: & Lin, T. J. (2022). Psychological Well-Being of Intellectually and Academically Gifted Students in SelfContained and Pull-Out Gifted Programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(3), 188–207. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211032987 Chowkase A. A., & Watve, S. (2021). From I to we: The three C’s conception of gifted education. In Sternberg, R. J., Ambrose, D., Karami, S. (Eds.), Transformational giftedness. Palgrave- Macmillan. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. Dilmaç, B. (2007). The assesment of the teaching of humane values which are imposed a group of science high school students by humane values scale. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Selçuk University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Konya. Farrall, J., & Henderson, L. (2015). Supporting your gifted and talented child’s achievement and well-being: A resource for parents. ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA. Fraenkel, J.R & Wallen, N.E (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed). New York. McGraw-hill Girgin, D. & Satmaz, I. (2019). Opinions of gifted students on scientific ınterviews at the science and art center. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Education