SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Effect of gonadotropin releasing hormon agonist addition to routine luteal phase support in intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycles on pregnancy rates and outcomes

Nagihan CENGAVER
Tuba MEMUR
Mahmut Kuntay KOKANALI
Gülnur ÖZAKŞİT
Nafiye YILMAZ
Pages
440–445
Publication Date
2020-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Addition of GnRH-a to routine LPS in ICSI-ET cycles of GnRH-a long protocol and GnRH-anta protocol seems to have no effect on ongoing pregnancy, abortion, multiple pregnancy, OHSS, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: Aim: To investigate the effect of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) addition to luteal phase support (LPS) in intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) cycles of GnRH-a long protocol and GnRH antagonist (GnRH-anta) protocol, on pregnancy rates and outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Subgroups Ib and IIb received leuprolide acetate (0.5 mg s.c.) injections on the 5th and 10th days after ET in addition to routine LPS [90 mg/day of vaginal progesterone plus 4 mg of 17β Estradiol].
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Addition of GnRH-a to routine LPS in ICSI-ET cycles of GnRH-a long protocol and GnRH-anta protocol seems to have no effect on ongoing pregnancy, abortion, multiple pregnancy, OHSS, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:gonadotropin · infertilite · luteal faz

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: To investigate the effect of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) addition to luteal phase support (LPS) in intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) cycles of GnRH-a long protocol and GnRH antagonist (GnRH-anta) protocol, on pregnancy rates and outcomes. Materials and Method: One hundred and eight infertile couples treated with ICSI-ET were included in this prospective randomized study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups to undergo two different ovarian stimulation protocols. GnRH-a iong protocol was applied to group I and GnRH-anta protocol was applied to group II. Women to be treated by each of the two protocols were also randomly assigned to one of the two subgroups. Subgroups Ib and IIb received leuprolide acetate (0.5 mg s.c.) injections on the 5th and 10th days after ET in addition to routine LPS [90 mg/day of vaginal progesterone plus 4 mg of 17β Estradiol]. Only routine LPS was given to other two subgroups (groups la and IIa). Results: The total number of retrieved oocytes and MII oocytes were significantly higher in group Ia than in group Ib. There were no differences between subgroups in groups I and II regarding clinical pregnancy, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), multiple pregnancy, abortion, ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates. Conclusion: Addition of GnRH-a to routine LPS in ICSI-ET cycles of GnRH-a long protocol and GnRH-anta protocol seems to have no effect on ongoing pregnancy, abortion, multiple pregnancy, OHSS, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.

Özet

Amaç: GnRH-a uzun protokol ve GnRH-anta protokol ICSI-ET sikluslarında rutin Luteal Faz Desteği ((LFD)’ne GnRH-a eklenmesinin gebelik oranlarına ve sonuçlarına etkisini araştırmak Gereçler ve Yöntem: Bu prospektif randomize çalışmaya ICSI-ET ile tedavi edilen yüz sekiz infertil çift dahil edildi. Hastalar iki farklı ovulasyon indüksiyon protokolüne tabi tutulmak için rastgele olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Grup I'e GnRH-a uzun protokolü ve grup II'ye GnRH-anta protokolü uygulandı. İki protokol ile tedavi edilecek kadınlar da iki alt gruptan birine rastgele olarak ayrıldı. Ib ve IIb alt gruplarına, rutin LFD'ye [90 mg / gün vajinal progesteron artı 4 mg 17β Estradiol] ek olarak ET'den sonra 5. ve 10. günlerde löprolid asetat (0.5 mg s.c.) enjeksiyonları uygulandı. Diğer iki alt gruba (grup la ve IIa) ise sadece rutin LPD verildi. Bulgular: Toplanan toplam oosit ve MII oosit sayısı, grup Ia'da grup Ib'den anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti. Grup I ve II'de alt gruplar arasında klinik gebelik, yumurtalık hiperstimülasyon sendromu (OHSS), çoğul gebelik, kürtaj, devam eden gebelik ve canlı doğum oranları açısından fark yoktu. Sonuç: GnRH-a uzun protokol ve GnRH-anta protokol ICSI-ET sikluslarında GnRH-a'nın rutin LPD'ye eklenmesinin devam eden gebelik, kürtaj, çoğul gebelik, OHSS, klinik gebelik ve canlı doğum oranları üzerinde hiçbir etkisi olmadığı görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

CENGAVER, N., MEMUR, T., KOKANALI, M. K., ÖZAKŞİT, G., YILMAZ, N. (2020). Effect of gonadotropin releasing hormon agonist addition to routine luteal phase support in intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycles on pregnancy rates and outcomes. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 440–445. https://ajindex.com/articles/676647

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M. Luteal phasesupport for assisted reproduction cycles.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;(10):CD009154. Fatemi HM, Popovic-Todorovic B, Papanikolaou E, Donoso P, Devroey P. An update of luteal phasesupport in stimulated IVF cycles. Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(6):581-90
  2. Shivapathasundram G, Kwik M, Chapman M. Luteal phase defect: part of the infertility zeitgeist or relic from the past?Hum Fertil (Camb). 2011 Mar;14(1):60-3. Fatemi HM. The luteal phase after 3 decades of IVF: what do we know? Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 4:4331 Devoto L, Kohen P, Muñoz A, Strauss JF 3rd. Human corpus luteum physiology and the luteal-phase dysfunction associated with ovarian stimulation.Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18 Suppl 2:19-24.
  3. Review. Nardo LG, Sallam HN. Progesterone supplementation to prevent recurrent miscarriage and to reduce implantation failure in assisted reproduction cycles.Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 Jul;13(1):47-57.
  4. Review. Fatemi HM, Kolibianakis EM, Camus M, Tournaye H, Donoso P, Papanikolaou E et al. Addition of estradiol to progesterone for luteal supplementation in patients stimulated with GnRH antagonist/rFSH for IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2628-32.
  5. Ubaldi F, Rienzi L, Ferrero S, Anniballo R, Iacobelli M, Cobellis L, et al. Low dose prednisolone administration in routine ICSI patients does not improve pregnancy and implantation rates. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1544- 7. Revelli A, Dolfin E, Gennarelli G, Lantieri T, Massobrio M, Holte JG, et al. Low-dose acetyl salicylic acid plus prednisolone as an adjuvant treatment in IVF: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1685-91.
  6. El-Toukhy T, Sunkara SK, Khairy M, Dyer R, Khalaf Y, Coomarasamy A. A systematic review and metaanalysis of acupuncture in in vitro fertilisation. BJOG 2008; 115: 1203-13. 1Tesarik J, Hazout A, Mendoza-Tesarik R, Mendoza N, Mendoza C. Beneficial effect of luteal phase GnRH agonist administration on embryo implantation after ICSI in both GnRH agonist and antagonist treated ovarian stimulation cycles. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2572-79.
  7. Pirard C, Donnez J, Loumaye E. GnRH agonist as luteal support in assisted reproduction technique cycles: results of a pilot study. Hum Reprod 2006;21:1894-1900.
  8. Tesarik J, Hazout A, Mendoza C. Enhancement of embryo developmental potential by a single administration of GnRH agonist at the time of implantation. Human Reprod 2004; 19: 1176 – 1180. Q