SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of manual versus automated measurement to estimate fetal weight in isolated oligohydramnios with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes

Preterm erken membran rüptürü olan izole oligohidramniyoz olgularında fetal ağırlığın tahmininde manuel ve otomatik ölçümlerin karşılaştırılması

Orhan ALTINBOĞA
Hasan EROGLU
Seyit Ahmet EROL
Betül YAKIŞTIRAN
Emre BAŞER
Aykan YÜCEL
Pages
524–528
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In correlation analysis, a significant positive correlation was found between actual BW and, both manual EFW and automated EFW (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective It was aimed to evaluate the effects of alternative measurement methods in estimating actual birth weight (actual BW) in third-trimester isolated oligohydramnios.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods In our study in prospective design, 78 pregnant women between 336/7and 366/7 weeks of gestation were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In correlation analysis, a significant positive correlation was found between actual BW and, both manual EFW and automated EFW (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fetal ultrasonografi · oligohidramniyoz · fetal ağırlık

Abstract

Objective It was aimed to evaluate the effects of alternative measurement methods in estimating actual birth weight (actual BW) in third-trimester isolated oligohydramnios. Methods In our study in prospective design, 78 pregnant women between 336/7and 366/7 weeks of gestation were evaluated. Routine biometric measurements were obtained through two-dimensional (2D) ultrasonography. Calipers were placed in the sections where the measurements were made for manual measurement. Then, automatic measurement was obtained by sonography device on the same image. Fetal weight was estimated using the Hadlock II formula. Results The mean manual and automated estimated fetal weights (EFWs) and actual birth weights (actual BWs) were 2281.1±326, 2371.5±324 and 2417.2±353, respectively. Manual EFW was lower than both actual BW and automated EFW at a statistically significant level (p = 0.002, p = 0.001, respectively). In correlation analysis, a significant positive correlation was found between actual BW and, both manual EFW and automated EFW (p

Özet

Amaç Üçüncü trimesterde tespit edilen izole oligohidramniyoz olgularında alternatif ölçüm yöntemlerinin gerçek (aktüel) doğum ağırlığını tahmin etmedeki etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntemler Prospektif kohort çalışmamızda, 336/7 ve 366/7 gebelik haftaları arasında 78 gebe değerlendirildi. Rutin biyometrik ölçümler iki boyutlu (2D) ultrasonografi ile elde edildi. Manuel ölçümlerin yapıldığı bölümlere kaliperler yerleştirildi. Daha sonra aynı görüntü üzerinde ultrasonografi cihazı ile otomatik ölçüm alındı. Fetal ağırlık Hadlock II formülü kullanılarak hesaplandı. Bulgular Ortalama manuel ve otomatik tahmini fetal ağırlıklar (TFA) ve gerçek doğum ağırlıkları (aktüel DA) sırasıyla 2281,1 ± 326, 2371,5 ± 324 ve 2417,2 ± 353 idi. Manuel TFA, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde hem gerçek (aktüel) DA'dan hem de otomatik TFA'dan daha düşüktü (sırasıyla p = 0.002, p = 0.001). Korelasyon analizinde, gerçek DA ile hem manuel TFA hem de otomatik TFA arasında anlamlı bir pozitif korelasyon bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINBOĞA, O., EROGLU, H., EROL, S. A., YAKIŞTIRAN, B., BAŞER, E., YÜCEL, A. (2020). Comparison of manual versus automated measurement to estimate fetal weight in isolated oligohydramnios with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 524–528. https://ajindex.com/articles/676620

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Das UG, Sysyn GD. Abnormal fetal growth: intrauterine growth retardation, small for gestational age, large for gestational age. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2004;51(3):639-54, viii
  2. Gynecologists ACoOa. Shoulder Asocial. COG Practice Pattern 2002;40
  3. Huber C, Zdanowicz JA, Mueller M, Surbek D. Factors influencing the accuracy of fetal weight estimation with a focus on preterm birth at the limit of viability: a systematic literature review. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(1):1-8
  4. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(3):333-7
  5. Rutherford SE, Smith CV, Phelan JP, Kawakami K, Ahn MO. Four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume. Interobserver and intraobserver variation. J Reprod Med. 1987;32(8):587-9
  6. Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(1):80-9
  7. Barel O, Maymon R, Vaknin Z, Tovbin J, Smorgick N. Sonographic fetal weight estimation - is there more to it than just fetal measurements? Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(1):50-5
  8. Ott WJ, Doyle S, Flamm S. Accurate ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight. Am J Perinatol. 1985;2(3):178-82
  9. Melamed N, Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Meizner I, Mashiach R, Glezerman M. Does use of a sex-specific model improve the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(5):549-57
  10. Blann DW, Prien SD. Estimation of fetal weight before and after amniotomy in the laboring gravid woman. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(5):1117-20
  11. Farrell T, Holmes R, Stone P. The effect of body mass index on three methods of fetal weight estimation. BJOG. 2002;109(6):651-7
  12. Blitz MJ, Rochelson B, Stork LB, Augustine S, Greenberg M, Sison CP, Vohra N. Maternal Body Mass Index and Amniotic Fluid Index in Late Gestation. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(3):561-8
  13. Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Melamed N, Bardin R, Wiznitzer A, Yogev Y. Does the level of amniotic fluid have an effect on the accuracy of sonographic estimated fetal weight at term? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(6):638-42
  14. Eroglu H, Orgul G, Avci E, Altinboga A, Karakoc G, Yucel A. Comparison of automated vs. manual measurement to estimate fetal weight in isolated polyhydramnios. J Perinat Med. 2019;47(6):592-7
  15. Predanic M, Cho A, Ingrid F, Pellettieri J. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: acquiring accuracy in residency.