Journals / Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Perceptions of obstetricians, midwives, and patients towards the delivery table shield: survey on a novel protective equipment

Kadın doğum uzmanları, ebeler ve hastaların doğum masası kalkanına yönelik algıları: yeni bir koruyucu ekipman ile ilgili anket çalışması

Pages
1127–1134
Publication Date
2022-03-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square test to compare the categorical variables and pair-wise comparisons were performed via the chi-square test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate perceptions of doctors, midwives, and patients regarding our designed delivery table shield (DTS) during second stage of vaginal deliveries of women with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this cross-sectional double-center study, semi-structured questionnaires were administered to doctors/midwives (n = 224) and patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 (n = 154) with experience on use of DTS during second stage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square test to compare the categorical variables and pair-wise comparisons were performed via the chi-square test.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Covid-19 · doğum · ebelik

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate perceptions of doctors, midwives, and patients regarding our designed delivery table shield (DTS) during second stage of vaginal deliveries of women with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Methods: In this cross-sectional double-center study, semi-structured questionnaires were administered to doctors/midwives (n = 224) and patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 (n = 154) with experience on use of DTS during second stage. All statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square test to compare the categorical variables and pair-wise comparisons were performed via the chi-square test. A p-value

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma, COVID-19 şüphesi olan veya doğrulanmış kadınların vajinal doğumlarının ikinci aşaması sırasında kullanımı için tasarladığımız doğum masası siperliğine (DTS) ilişkin doktorların, ebelerin ve hastaların algılarını değerlendirmeyi amaçladı. Yöntemler: Bu kesitsel çift merkezli çalışmada, ikinci evrede DTS kullanımı deneyimi olan doktorlara/ebelere (n = 224) ve COVID-19 şüphesi olan veya doğrulanmış COVID-19 hastalarına (n = 154) yarı yapılandırılmış anketler uygulandı. . Tüm istatistiksel analizler, kategorik değişkenleri karşılaştırmak için ki-kare testi kullanılarak yapıldı ve ikili karşılaştırmalar ki-kare testi ile yapıldı. p değeri

🔖

Cite This Article

YEGİN, G. F., BAHAT, P. Y., TANACAN, A., SECEN, E. İ., EROL, S. A., KESKİN, H. L., ÖZDEMİR, İ., TEKİN, Ö. M., SAHİN, D. (2022). Perceptions of obstetricians, midwives, and patients towards the delivery table shield: survey on a novel protective equipment. Jinekoloji-Obstetrik ve Neonatoloji Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 1127–1134. https://ajindex.com/articles/676522

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Yu F, Yan L, Wang N, Yang S, Wang L, Tang Y, Gao G, Wang S, Ma C, Xie R, Wang F, Tan C, Zhu L, Guo Y, Zhang F. Quantitative Detection and Viral Load Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in Infected Patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):793-798. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa345
  2. Albott CS, Wozniak JR, McGlinch BP, Wall MH, Gold BS, Vinogradov S. Battle Buddies: Rapid Deployment of a Psychological Resilience Intervention for Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Anesth Analg. 2020 Jul;131(1):43-54
  3. Coxon K, Turienzo CF, Kweekel L, Goodarzi B, Brigante L, Simon A. The impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on maternity care in Europe. Midwifery 2020; 88: 102779
  4. Brown J, Pope C. Personal protective equipment and possible routes of airborne spread during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anaesthesia. 2020; 75(8): 1116-7
  5. Jessop ZM, Dobbs TD, Ali SR, Combellack E, Clancy R, Ibrahim N, et al. Personal protective equipment for surgeons during COVID-19 pandemic: systematic review of availability, usage and rationing. Br J Surg 2020; 107(10): 1262-80
  6. MacIntyre CR, Chughtai AA. A rapid systematic review of the efficacy of face masks and respirators against coronaviruses and other respiratory transmissible viruses for the community, healthcare workers and sick patients. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 108: 103629
  7. Sinha MS, Bourgeois FT, Sorger PK. Personal Protective Equipment for COVID-19: Distributed Fabrication and Additive Manufacturing. Am J Public Health 2020; 110(8): 1162-4
  8. Boelig RC, Manuck T, Oliver EA, Di Mascio D, Saccone G, Bellussi F, et al. Labor and delivery guidance for COVID-19. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 2(2): 100110
  9. Sahin D, Ahmet Erol S, Tanacan A, Ozcan N, Keskin HL, et al. Protective equipment to use in the vaginal delivery of the pregnant woman with suspected or diagnosed coronavirus disease 2019: delivery table shield. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223(4): 599-601
  10. Sahin D, Tanacan A, Erol SA, Anuk AT, Yetiskin FDY, Keskin HL, et al. Updated experience of a tertiary pandemic center on 533 pregnant women with COVID-19 infection: A prospective cohort study from Turkey. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2021; 152(3): 328-34
  11. Sahin D, Tanacan A, Erol SA, Anuk AT, Eyi EG, Ozgu-Erdinc AS, et al. A pandemic center's experience of managing pregnant women with COVID-19 infection in Turkey: A prospective cohort study. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2020; 151(1): 74-82
  12. World Health Organization. Modes of transmission of virus causing COVID-19 implica