Journals / İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Change in Conceptualization of Power

Güç Kavramsallaştırmasında Değişim

Pages
87–113
Publication Date
2014-10-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides intention of actor should be credited to asses the efficiency of its power.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Change is inevitable in every conception of politics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The conception of power is not an exception.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides intention of actor should be credited to asses the efficiency of its power.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Güç · Uluslararası İlişkiler · Değişim.

Abstract

Change is inevitable in every conception of politics. The conception of power is not an exception. The main debate of International Relations (IR), realism and liberalism, represent this change process though, change can also be witnessed in each conception as well. The general currency can be observed as a transition from measurable, coercive and deterrent nature towards value-laden, cooperative and co-optive nature of power. The context of power can be assumed by factors such as international political environment and perceived nature of threat that requires a ‘flexible’ approach to describe its nature. Besides intention of actor should be credited to asses the efficiency of its power.

Özet

Değişim, bütün siyasal konseptler için kaçınılmaz bir gerçekliktir. Bu bağlamda, güç konsepti bir istisnai durum değildir. Uluslararası İlişkilerde ana tartışma konusu olan, realizm ve liberalizm bu değişimi temsil edebilir ve her konseptte de bu değişim görülebilir. Genel geçerlilik, ölçülebilir, cebri, ve caydırıcılıktan değer yüklü, işbirlikçi ve seçilmiş bir güç tanımına kaymıştır.Güç kavramının kapsamı, uluslararası siyasi çevre ve algılanan tehditin doğasıyla anlaşılıbilir ve bu da esnek bir yaklaşım gerektirir. Bunun yanında, aktörlerin niyetleri güçün etkinliğiyle ölçülebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖĞÜN, M. N., ASLAN, M. (2014). Change in Conceptualization of Power. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 87–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/676171

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abbot, Jacop, Alexander the Great, New York, Harper and Brothers, 1902.
  2. Arendt Hannah, On Violence, New York, Harcourt, Brace & World, 1970.
  3. Armitage, Richard L. and Nye, Joseph S. Implementing Smart Power: Setting an Agenda for National Security Reform, Statement before the Foreign Relation Committee of US Senate. Baldwin, David A., “Power and International Relations”, Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons Beth (eds), Handbook of International Relations, London, Sage. Berenskkoetter, Felix, “Thinking About Power” in Power in World Politics, Felix Berenskkoetter and M.J.Williams (eds), New York, Routledge, 2007.
  4. Boulding, Kenneth, Three Faces of Power, Newbury Park, Sage Publications, 1989.
  5. Burchill, Scout, “Realism and Neorealism” in Theories of International Relations, Scott Burchill, Andrew Linklater, Richard Devetak, Jack Donnelly, Matthew Paterson, Christian Reus-Smit, Jacqui True (eds), 2nd Edition,
  6. New York, Palgrave, 2001.
  7. Carr, Edward Hallet, Twenty Years Crisis, New York, Palgrave, 1988.
  8. Coleman, Peter T., “Positive Power: Mapping the Dimesions of Constructive Power Relations”, International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution, Teachers’ College, Colombia University. Cooper, Robert, the Goals of Diplomacy, Hard Power, and Soft Power, David Held/Mathias Koenig-Archibugi (eds), American Power in the 21st Century, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2004.
  9. Dahl, Robert A., “The Concept of Power”, Behavioural Science, 2, 1957.
  10. Deutsch, Karl W., “On the Concepts of Politics and Power”, Journal of International Affairs, 21, 1967.
  11. Deutsch, Karl W., The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control, New York, Collier-Macmillan, 1963.
  12. Digeser, Peter, “The Fourth Face of Power”, Journal of Politics, 54/4, 1992.
  13. Foucault, Michel, The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality 1, London, Penguin Books, 1998.
  14. Griffiths, Martin, Fifty key Thinkers in International Relations, London, Routledge, 1999.
  15. Hökmark, Gunnar (Ambassador), Speech in Tel Aviv University on October 31, 2006. http://www.european-enterprise.org/items/whatwedo/ articlesspeeches/Tel_Aviv_University_Diplomacy_and_balance_rev.pdf http://people.uma ss. edu/hist101/docs%20absolutism%20101-2007.pdf http://www.csis.org/index.php?option=com_csis_congress&task=view&id=254 http://www.tc.columbia.edu/i/a/document/9109_PositivePower.pdf
  16. Jackson, Robert, http://www.oup.com/uk/orc/bin/9780199285433 /jackson_chap06.pdf Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S. Jr., “Power and Indep