Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4

DEVELOPING AN INPATIENT PERCEIVED HEALTHCARE SERVICE QUALITY SCALE (IP-HSQS)

YATAN HASTALARIN SAĞLIK HİZMET KALİTESİNE İLİŞKİN ALGISINI ÖLÇMEK İÇİN BİR ÖLÇEK GELİŞTİRME ÇALIŞMASI

Pages
1377–1410
Publication Date
2019-12-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A 51-item scale has been recommended, as a result of statistical analyses

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Quality is a high priority topic in healthcare services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The devised scale was implemented on 268 patients in a public hospital in Eskisehir, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A 51-item scale has been recommended, as a result of statistical analyses
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hizmet Kalitesi · Sağlık Endüstrisi · Ölçek Geliştirme

Abstract

Quality is a high priority topic in healthcare services. After the debates on the implementation of SERVQUAL, the most widely used generic scale to determine service quality, in the healthcare industry, recent studies on service quality focus on the development of industry and culture-specific scales. The initial aim of this study is to develop a model for the conceptualization of healthcare service quality, and then develop a valid and reliable scale that can be used in the measurement of the perceived healthcare service quality of inpatients in Turkish public hospitals through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. The study also recommends a method to be used in the model for the prioritization of dimensions. The devised scale was implemented on 268 patients in a public hospital in Eskisehir, Turkey. The output shows that the inpatients rank quality dimensions based on their priorities as staff quality, physical quality and process quality respectively. A 51-item scale has been recommended, as a result of statistical analyses

Özet

Kalite sağlık hizmetlerinde yüksek derecede öncelikli bir konudur. Hizmet kalitesi ölçümünde en çok kullanılan jenerik bir ölçek olan SERVQUAL’in uygulanması üzerine yapılan tartışmalar neticesinde, son çalışmalar endüstri ve kültüre özgü ölçekler geliştirilmesi yönündedir. Bu çalışmanın ilk amacı sağlık hizmet kalitesinin kavramsallaştırılması için bir model önermek, sonrasında da açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri aracılığıyla Türkiye’de kamu hastanelerinde yatan hastaların sağlık hizmet kalitesine ilişkin algılarını ölçmede kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek geliştirmektir. Çalışma ayrıca modelde yer alan boyutların önceliklendirilmesi için de bir yöntem önermektedir. Önerilen ölçek Türkiye’de Eskişehir ilinde yer alan bir kamu hastanesinde yatan 268 hastaya uygulanmıştır. Çıktılar, yatan hastaların kalite boyutlarını öncelik sıralamasının personel kalitesi, fiziksel kalite ve süreç kalitesi şeklinde olduğunu göstermektedir. İstatistiksel analiz sonuçlarından hareketle 51 maddeden oluşan bir ölçek önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DENİZ, N., BÜYÜK, K. (2019). DEVELOPING AN INPATIENT PERCEIVED HEALTHCARE SERVICE QUALITY SCALE (IP-HSQS). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 4, 1377–1410. https://ajindex.com/articles/67554

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aagja, J. P. & Garg, R. (2010). Measuring perceived service quality for public hospitals (PubHosQual) in the Indian context. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 4(1), 60-83.
  2. Agarwal, A. & Singh, A. R. P. (2016). Service quality and patient satisfaction: An exploratory study of pathology laboratories in Jaipur. Hospital Topic, 94(2), 23-32.
  3. Akhade G.N., Jaju, S.B. & Lakhe R. R. (2013). A review on healthcare service quality dimensions. Sixth International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology. Ayhan, E. (2009). Sağlık işletmelerinde uygulanmak üzere iç aralık analizi modeli oluşturulması. (Unpublished MSc thesis). Istanbul Technical University, Social Sciences Institute, İstanbul.
  4. Bakan, İ., Büyükbeşe, T. & Erşahan, B. (2014). The impact of total quality service (TQS) on healthcare and patient satisfaction: An empirical study of Turkish private and public hospitals. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 29(3), 292-315.
  5. Barzi, A. (2009). Quality in healthcare organizations: Its meaning and measurement, (Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy Thesis). University of Texas, Texas School of Public Health, Texas. Brady, M. K. & Cronin, J. J. (2001). Customer orientation: Effects on customer service perceptions and outcome behaviors. Journal of Service Research, 3, 241-251.
  6. Büyüközkan, G., Çiftçi, G. & Güleryüz, S. (2011). Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 9407–9424.
  7. Chakravarty, C.A. (2011). Evaluation of service quality of hospital outpatient department services. MJAFI, 67(3), 221-224.
  8. Chahal, H. & Kumari, N. (2010). Development of multidimensional scale for healthcare service quality (HCSQ) in Indian context. Journal of Indian Business Research, 2(4), 230-255.
  9. Cronin, J. J. & Taylor, S.A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
  10. Dagger, T. S., Sweeney, J. C. & Johnson L.W. (2007). A hierarchical model of health service quality scale development and investigation of an integrated model. Journal of Service Research, 10(2), 123-142.
  11. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale Development Theory and Applications, Second Edition, Cume 26: Applied Social Research Methods Series. Duggirala, M., Rajendran, C. & Anantharaman, R.N. (2008). Patient-perceived dimensions of total quality service in healthcare. India Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(5), 560-583.
  12. Eldem, E