Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

THE ROLE OF TRANSFORMATIVE POWER OF SUFFERING ON THE IMPACTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT, SOCIAL CONNECTEDNESS AND THE WORLD ASSUMPTIONS ON POSTTRAUMATIC GROWTH: AN EVALUATION IN THE CONTEXT OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY

ÖRGÜTSEL DESTEK, SOSYAL BAĞLILIK VE DÜNYAYA İLİŞKİN VARSAYIMLARIN TRAVMA SONRASI BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE ACININ DÖNÜŞTÜRÜCÜ GÜCÜNÜN ROLÜ: POZİTİF PSİKOLOJİ BAĞLAMINDA BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Pages
361–402
Publication Date
2020-03-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results were evaluated in the light of the previous conceptual and empirical studies and the theoretical and practical implications of the study were discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the organizational, contextual and psychosocial antecedents of posttraumatic growth concept are studied.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Based on the literature review, it was assumed that organizational support and social connectedness as organizational and contextual variables and assumptions about the world and the transformative power of suffering as psychosocial variables would have significant and positive impacts on posttraumatic growth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results were evaluated in the light of the previous conceptual and empirical studies and the theoretical and practical implications of the study were discussed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Travma Sonrası Büyüme · Örgütsel Destek · Sosyal Bağlılık

Abstract

In this study, the organizational, contextual and psychosocial antecedents of posttraumatic growth concept are studied. Based on the literature review, it was assumed that organizational support and social connectedness as organizational and contextual variables and assumptions about the world and the transformative power of suffering as psychosocial variables would have significant and positive impacts on posttraumatic growth. In order to test the conceptual relations among the variables as assumed in the theoretical framework, a research study has been performed. As a result of the research survey, it was determined that perceived organizational support, social connectedness and world assumptions were significant predictors of posttraumatic growth. These findings were found to be consistent with the previous theoretical and empirical results. Moreover, it was revealed that the transformative power of suffering had a significant moderating role on the impact of both individuals' perceived organizational support and world assumptions on posttraumatic growth levels. However, regarding the relationship between the perception of social connectedness and posttraumatic growth, the moderating effect of the transformative power of suffering was not significant. The results were evaluated in the light of the previous conceptual and empirical studies and the theoretical and practical implications of the study were discussed.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, travma sonrası büyüme (TSB) kavramının örgütsel, bağlamsal ve psikososyal öncelleri ele alınmıştır. Yapılan literatür incelemesi sonucunda, örgütsel ve bağlamsal değişkenler olarak örgütsel destek ve sosyal bağlılık algısının, psikososyal değişkenler olarak da dünyaya ilişkin varsayımlar ve acının dönüştürücü gücünün TSB’yi anlamlı ve olumlu yönde etkileyebileceği varsayılmıştır. Kuramsal çerçevede önerilmiş olan hipotetik ilişkilerin test edilmesi için yapılan araştırma sonucunda, algılanan örgütsel desteğin, sosyal bağlılığın ve dünyaya ilişkin varsayımların TSB’nun anlamlı birer yordayıcısı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bu bulguların, önceki kuramsal ve görgül çalışma sonuçları ile uyumlu olduğu görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte, acının dönüştürücü gücünün, bireylerin algıladıkları örgütsel destek ve dünyaya ilişkin varsayımlarının TSB düzeyleri üzerindeki etkisinde düzenleyici rolü olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sosyal bağlılık algısının TSB ile olan ilişkisinde ise acının dönüştürücü gücünün düzenleyici etkisi anlamlı bulunmamıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, önceki kuramsal ve görgül çalışmalar ışığında değerlendirilmiş ve çalışmanın kuramsal ve uygulamaya yönelik doğurguları tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOLAT, T., BOLAT, O. İ., TAŞTAN, S. (2020). THE ROLE OF TRANSFORMATIVE POWER OF SUFFERING ON THE IMPACTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT, SOCIAL CONNECTEDNESS AND THE WORLD ASSUMPTIONS ON POSTTRAUMATIC GROWTH: AN EVALUATION IN THE CONTEXT OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 361–402. https://ajindex.com/articles/67539

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 29(1), 99-118.
  2. Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği (2015). Ruhsal bozuklukların tanısal ve sayımsal el kitabı Beşinci Baskı (DSM-5), Tanı Ölçütleri Başvuru Elkitabı. (E. Köroğlu, Çev.). Ankara:Hekimler Yayın Birliği. Bandura, A. (1968). A social learning interpretation of psychological dysfunctions. Foundations of Abnormal Psychology, 4(4), 293-344.
  3. Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. NY: John Wiley & Sons. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin, 117(3), 497-520.
  4. Bolat, O. İ., Bolat, T., & Seymen, O. A. (2009). Güçlendirici lider davranışları ve örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı arasındaki ilişkinin sosyal mübadele kuramından hareketle incelenmesi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(21), 215-239.
  5. Bowlby, J. (1969).
  6. Attachment and loss, New York, USA: Basic Books. Brewer, M. B. (2008). Deprovincialization: Social identity complexity and outgroup acceptance. Improving Intergroup Relations, 10(2), 160-176.
  7. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 917-930.
  8. Briere, J., & Elliott, D. (2000). Prevalence, characteristics, and long-term sequelae of natural disaster exposure in the general population. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 13(4), 661-679.
  9. Brooks, M., Graham-Kevan, N., Lowe, M., & Robinson, S. (2017). Rumination, event centrality, and perceived control as predictors of post-traumatic growth and distress: The Cognitive Growth and Stress model. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 286-302
  10. Burton, P., Gorter, J., & Paul, R. (2009). Recovering from workplace traumatic events. Journal of Employee Assistance, 39(2), 10-11.
  11. Buss, D. M. (1990). The evolution of anxiety and social exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 196-201.
  12. Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (1998). Beyond recovery from trauma: Implications for clinical practice and research. Journal of Social Issues, 54(2), 357-371.
  13. Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2013). Posttraumatic growth in clinical practice. New York: Routledge. Cardozo, B. L. (2008). Guidelines need a more evidence based approach: A commentary on the IASC