SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

THE EFFECT OF CONSUMER VALUE AND CONSUMER-BRAND IDENTITY ON BRAND LOYALTY: THE CASE OF A SMART PHONE

TÜKETİCİ DEĞERİ VE TÜKETİCİ-MARKA KİMLİĞİNİN MARKA SADAKATİNE OLAN ETKİSİ: AKILLI TELEFON ÖRNEĞİ

Ece AKSU ARMAĞAN
Elif ARIK
Mertcan MERT
Pages
623–653
Publication Date
2020-06-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting the preferred smartphone brand in Turkey, reveals the situation and understand the behavior of smartphone consumers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The smart phone sector, which is the most popular among today's global technology areas, continues to grow without slowing down and innovative steps are being taken every day in this sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted for smartphone users and a primary questionnaire was collected with a 33-question questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting the preferred smartphone brand in Turkey, reveals the situation and understand the behavior of smartphone consumers.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Akıllı Telefon · Tüketici Değeri · Tüketici-Marka Kimliği

Abstract

The smart phone sector, which is the most popular among today's global technology areas, continues to grow without slowing down and innovative steps are being taken every day in this sector. The aim of the study is to examine the effect of consumer value and consumer-brand identity on brand loyalty. The research was conducted for smartphone users and a primary questionnaire was collected with a 33-question questionnaire. Yeh, Wang, and Yieh 's (2016) scale were used in the study which examined the model that showed the relationship between consumer value and consumer-brand identity perspective. The responses of 1003 people who participated in the study were analyzed by using SPSS 21 statistics program and as a result, factor analysis was performed and the perceived consumer value and consumer-brand identity issues were analyzed with t-tests and anova one-way variance. In addition, there were differences in terms of demographic characteristics of consumers and their distribution was also revealed. As a result of the research, a positive relationship was found between consumer value and consumer-brand identity which are effective in smartphone loyalty. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting the preferred smartphone brand in Turkey, reveals the situation and understand the behavior of smartphone consumers.

Özet

Günümüz global teknoloji alanları arasında en çok ilgi gören akıllı telefon sektörü, hız kesmeden büyümeye devam etmekte ve bu sektörde her geçen gün yenilikçi adımlar atılmaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı, tüketici değeri ve tüketici-marka kimliğinin marka sadakatine olan etkisini incelemektir. Araştırma akıllı telefon kullanıcılarına yönelik gerçekleştirilmiş ve 33 sorudan oluşan bir anket ile birincil veri toplanmıştır. Tüketici değeri ve tüketici-marka kimliği perspektif ilişkisini ortaya koyan modeli inceleyen araştırmada Yeh, Wang, ve Yieh' in (2016) ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya katılan 1003 kişiden alınan cevaplar, SPSS 21 istatistik programı kullanılarak analizi yapılmış sonuç olarak ise faktör analizinin yapılmasıyla farklı alt gruplara ayrılmış olan tüketici değeri ve tüketici-marka kimliği konularındaki algılanan, t-testleri ve anova tek yönlü varyans ile analiz edilmiştir. Ayrıca tüketicilerin demografik özellikleri bakımından farklılıklar meydana gelmiş olup dağılımları da ortaya konulmuştur. Araştırmanın sonucunda, akıllı telefon sadakatinde etkili olan tüketici değeri ve tüketici-marka kimliği arasında pozitif yönde ilişki ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de akıllı cep telefonu markası tercihine etki eden faktörleri incelemek, durumunu ortaya koymak ve akıllı telefon tüketicisinin tutumunu anlamaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARMAĞAN, E. A., ARIK, E., MERT, M. (2020). THE EFFECT OF CONSUMER VALUE AND CONSUMER-BRAND IDENTITY ON BRAND LOYALTY: THE CASE OF A SMART PHONE. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 623–653. https://ajindex.com/articles/67513

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aaker, D.A. (2014). Aaker on branding: 20 principles that drive success. New York: Morgan James Publishing. Aktuğlu, I.K. (2014). Marka yönetimi güçlü ve başarılı markalar için temel ilkeler. İstanbul:
  2. İletişim Yayınları.
  3. Anderson, R.E., & Srinivasan, S.S. (2003). E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: a contingency framework. Psychology & Marketing, 20 (2), 123–138.
  4. Armağan, E., & Temel, E. (2018). Türki̇ye’de online kompulsi̇f alışveri̇ş davranışı üzeri̇ne ampi̇ri̇k bi̇r çalışma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20 (4), 621–653.
  5. Steenkamp, L.P., & Wessels, P.L. (2009). An investigation into students’ perceptions of accountants. Meditari Accountancy Research, 17 (1), 117–132.
  6. Bhattacharya, C.B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: a framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67 (2), 76–88.
  7. Cha, M.K., Yi, Y., & Bagozzi, R.P. (2016). Effects of customer participation in corporate social responsibility ( CSR ) Programs on the CSR- brand fit and brand loyalty. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 57(3), 235-249.
  8. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M.B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65 (2), 81–93.
  9. De Chernatony, L., Harris, F., & Dall'Olmo Riley F. (2000). Added value: its nature, roles and sustainability. European Journal of Marketing, 34 (1/2), 39–56.
  10. Elliott, R., & Wattanasuwan, K. (1998). Brands as symbolic resources for the construction of identity. International Journal of Advertising, 17 (2), 131–144.
  11. Fiore, A.M., Kim, J., & Lee, H.H. (2005). Effect of image interactivity technology on consumer responses toward the online retailer. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19 (3), 38–53.
  12. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference. NewYork: Routledge. Graf, A., & Maas, P., (2008). Customer value from a customer perspective: A comprehensive review. Journal fur Betriebswirtschaft, 58 (1), 1–20.
  13. Hansen, J.D., Beitelspacher, L.S., & Deitz, G.D. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of consumers’ comparative value assessments across the relationship life cycle. Journal of Business Research, 66 (4), 473-479.
  14. Holbrook, M.B. (1999). Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. London & Newyork: Routledge. Hu, H.H., Kandampully, J., & Juwaheer, T.D. (2009). Relationships and impacts of service quality, perceived value, customer sa