Journals / İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Dignity Perspectives of Human Resources Management Workers

İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Çalışanlarının İnsanlık Onuruna Bakışları

Pages
2510–2534
Publication Date
2018-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been determined that workers of human resources management have a dignity-oriented perspective in the process of human resource management to a large extent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dignity has begun to create a problematic area in the working life and human resources management due to the problems that have been experienced in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study focuses on dignity-oriented approach to human resource management developed by Bal and Jong (2017).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been determined that workers of human resources management have a dignity-oriented perspective in the process of human resource management to a large extent.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İnsanlık Onuru · İşyerinde Demokrasi · İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi

Abstract

Dignity has begun to create a problematic area in the working life and human resources management due to the problems that have been experienced in recent years. The study focuses on dignity-oriented approach to human resource management developed by Bal and Jong (2017). For this, human resource management workers' views of dignity have been analyzed through qualitative research. In the sample consisting of 14 human resources management workers, the employer brand, performance management and rewarding, talent management and exit management for human dignity were determined. A total of 109 codes were made in the research, 9 main themes and 29 sub-themes were determined. It has been determined that workers of human resources management have a dignity-oriented perspective in the process of human resource management to a large extent.

Özet

İnsanlık onuru son dönemde yaşanan sorunlar nedeniyle çalışma yaşamında ve insan kaynakları yönetiminde bir sorun alanı oluşturmaya başlamıştır. Bu nedenle çalışmada, Bal ve Jong (2017) tarafından geliştirilen insan kaynakları yönetiminde insanlık onuru odaklı bakış ele alınmıştır. Bunun için insan kaynakları yönetimi çalışanları insanlık onuruna bakışları nitel bir araştırma ile analiz edilmiştir. 14 İKÇ’den oluşan örneklemde işveren markası, performans ve ödüllendirme yönetimi, yetenek yönetimi ve işten çıkarma sürecinde insanlık onuruna bakışları incelenmiştir. Toplam 109 kodlamanın yapıldığı araştırmada, 9 ana tema ve 29 alt tema belirlenmiştir. İnsan kaynakları alanında çalışanların büyük ölçüde insan kaynakları yönetimi süreçlerinde insanlık onuru odaklı bakışa sahip oldukları belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEÇER, B., YAZICI, M. O. (2018). Dignity Perspectives of Human Resources Management Workers. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 2510–2534. https://ajindex.com/articles/675010

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Armstrong, M. (2006). Performance Management: Key Strategies and Practical Guidelines. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
  2. Armstrong, M. ve Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
  3. Bach, S. ve Edwards, M. R. (2013). Managing Human Resource: Human Resource Management in Transition. London: CPI Group. Backhaus, K. ve Tikoo, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and Researching Employer Branding. Career Development International, 9(5), 501-517. doi: 10.1108/13620430410550754 Bal, P. M. (2017). Dignity in the Workplace: New Theoretical Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Bal, P. M. ve Jong, S. B. de. (2017). From Human Resource Management to Human Dignity Development: A Dignity Perspective on HRM and the Role of Workplace Democracy. Kostera M. ve Pirson M. (Ed.), Dignity and the Organization (s.173-195). London: Palgrave Macmillan, Bolton, S. C. (2007). Dignity in and at Work: Why It Matters. Bolton, S.C. (Ed.), Dimensions of Dignity at Work (s.3-16). Oxford: Routledge. Boxall, P. (2014). The Future of Employment Relations from the Perspective of Human Resource Management. Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(4), 578-593. doi: 10.1177/0022185614527980 Bulut, N. (2008). Eski Yunan’dan Aydınlanma Çağına İnsan Onuru Kavramının Geleceğine Genel Bir Bakış. Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3), 23-38.
  4. Devine, K., Reay, T., Stainton, L. ve Collins‐Nakai, R. (2003). Downsizing Outcomes: Better a Victim Than a Survivor?. Human Resource Management, 42 (2), 109-124. doi: 10.1002/hrm.10071 Desai, M. A. (2012).
  5. The Incentive Bubble, Harvard Business Review, 124-133.
  6. Gerhart, B. ve Fang, M. (2014). Pay for Individual Performance: Issues, Claims, Evidence and the Role of Sorting Effects. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 41-52. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.010 Gilbert, J. T. (2000). Sorrow and Guilt: An Ethical Analysis of Layoffs. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 65(2), 4-13.
  7. Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A Review and Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261-278.
  8. James, N. ve Hugh, B. (2016). Online Interviewing. Silverman D. (Ed.), Qualitative Research (s.245-260). London: Sage. Lebech, M. (2004). What is Human Dignity?. Maynooth Philosophical Papers, 2, 59-69. doi: 10.5840/mpp200428 Murphy, J. ve Willmott H. (2015). The Rise of the 1%: an Organizational. Explanation Elites on Trial, 25-53. doi:/10.1108/S0733-558X20150000043013 Pirson, M. A. ve Lawrence P. R. (2010).