Journals / İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Les rapports entre armateurs et États détenant des navires-Le rôle du Tribunal international du droit de la mer (The Relationship between the Shipowners and the Detaining State - The role of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea)

Armatörler ve Gemiyi Tutan Devletler Arasındaki İlişki-Uluslararası Deniz Hukuku Mahkemesinin Rolü

Pages
23–34
Publication Date
2016-07-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although still not sufficiently well-known by ship-owners, the procedure under Article 292 of the UN Law of the Sea Convention covers a most substantial part of the overall activity of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although still not sufficiently well-known by ship-owners, the procedure under Article 292 of the UN Law of the Sea Convention covers a most substantial part of the overall activity of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main objective of Article 292 procedure is for the Tribunal to appreciate the reasonableness of such a bond by the ship-owner is actually.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Yet, despite the efforts of the Tribunal, many crucial questions regarding this procedure remain unanswered (criteria of the reasonableness, possibility for the detaining State to confiscate the ship ad son on)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:fishing vessels · detention of vessels · ship-owners

Abstract

Although still not sufficiently well-known by ship-owners, the procedure under Article 292 of the UN Law of the Sea Convention covers a most substantial part of the overall activity of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. This procedure enables ship-owners to obtain the prompt release of their vessels detained by coastal States for alleged illegal fishing in their EEZ as well as the prompt liberation of the detained crews upon the posting of a reasonable bond. The main objective of Article 292 procedure is for the Tribunal to appreciate the reasonableness of such a bond by the ship-owner is actually. Yet, despite the efforts of the Tribunal, many crucial questions regarding this procedure remain unanswered (criteria of the reasonableness, possibility for the detaining State to confiscate the ship ad son on)

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAGIANNIS, S. (2016). Les rapports entre armateurs et États détenant des navires-Le rôle du Tribunal international du droit de la mer (The Relationship between the Shipowners and the Detaining State - The role of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea). İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 23–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/674821

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...