Web based homework is a rapidly growing educational use of the Internet In this study the effects on the students rsquo; achievements of the web based homework with pen based homework were compared nbsp; According to pretest posttest control group design the study was applied to experimental and control groups during two semesters Students included in the experimental group were conducted their homework on LON CAPA The Learning Online Network with a Computer Assisted Personalized Approach Students included in the control group were performed their homework on pen paper The achievements of the students in the groups were evaluated not also their homework results but also their exam scores According to results obtained from the study it was found that the homework results of the experimental group were higher than the homework results of the control group When the exam scores of the groups were examined it was found that the results of the groups were found nearly equal When the results of the study were generally evaluated it could be said that the homework performances of the students in the experimental group did not represent their success and the web based homework system wasn rsquo;t provide a contribution on students rsquo; achievement nbsp;
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Web based homework is a rapidly growing educational use of the Internet In this study the effects on the students rsquo; achievements of the web based homework with pen based homework were compared nbsp; According to pretest posttest control group design the study was applied to experimental and control groups during two semesters Students included in the experimental group were conducted their homework on LON CAPA The Learning Online Network with a Computer Assisted Personalized Approach Students included in the control group were performed their homework on pen paper The achievements of the students in the groups were evaluated not also their homework results but also their exam scores According to results obtained from the study it was found that the homework results of the experimental group were higher than the homework results of the control group When the exam scores of the groups were examined it was found that the results of the groups were found nearly equal When the results of the study were generally evaluated it could be said that the homework performances of the students in the experimental group did not represent their success and the web based homework system wasn rsquo;t provide a contribution on students rsquo; achievement nbsp;
📊
Key Findings & Data:Web based homework is a rapidly growing educational use of the Internet In this study the effects on the students rsquo; achievements of the web based homework with pen based homework were compared nbsp; According to pretest posttest control group design the study was applied to experimental and control groups during two semesters Students included in the experimental group were conducted their homework on LON CAPA The Learning Online Network with a Computer Assisted Personalized Approach Students included in the control group were performed their homework on pen paper The achievements of the students in the groups were evaluated not also their homework results but also their exam scores According to results obtained from the study it was found that the homework results of the experimental group were higher than the homework results of the control group When the exam scores of the groups were examined it was found that the results of the groups were found nearly equal When the results of the study were generally evaluated it could be said that the homework performances of the students in the experimental group did not represent their success and the web based homework system wasn rsquo;t provide a contribution on students rsquo; achievement nbsp;
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Web based homework is a rapidly growing educational use of the Internet In this study the effects on the students rsquo; achievements of the web based homework with pen based homework were compared nbsp; According to pretest posttest control group design the study was applied to experimental and control groups during two semesters Students included in the experimental group were conducted their homework on LON CAPA The Learning Online Network with a Computer Assisted Personalized Approach Students included in the control group were performed their homework on pen paper The achievements of the students in the groups were evaluated not also their homework results but also their exam scores According to results obtained from the study it was found that the homework results of the experimental group were higher than the homework results of the control group When the exam scores of the groups were examined it was found that the results of the groups were found nearly equal When the results of the study were generally evaluated it could be said that the homework performances of the students in the experimental group did not represent their success and the web based homework system wasn rsquo;t provide a contribution on students rsquo; achievement nbsp;
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ağ tabanlı ev ödevi · eğitim teknolojisi · geleneksel ev ödevi
Abstract
Web based homework is a rapidly growing educational use of the Internet In this study the effects on the students rsquo; achievements of the web based homework with pen based homework were compared nbsp; According to pretest posttest control group design the study was applied to experimental and control groups during two semesters Students included in the experimental group were conducted their homework on LON CAPA The Learning Online Network with a Computer Assisted Personalized Approach Students included in the control group were performed their homework on pen paper The achievements of the students in the groups were evaluated not also their homework results but also their exam scores According to results obtained from the study it was found that the homework results of the experimental group were higher than the homework results of the control group When the exam scores of the groups were examined it was found that the results of the groups were found nearly equal When the results of the study were generally evaluated it could be said that the homework performances of the students in the experimental group did not represent their success and the web based homework system wasn rsquo;t provide a contribution on students rsquo; achievement nbsp;
Özet
Eğitim ve öğretimde internetin yaygın kullanımı ağ tabanlı ödev sistemlerinin yaygınlaşmasına yol açmıştır. Bu çalışmada ağ tabanlı ve geleneksel ev ödevlerinin öğrencilerin başarısı üzerindeki etkileri karşılaştırılmıştır. Araştırma öntest-sontest kontrol gruplu deney desenine göre iki dönem süresince deney ve kontrol gruplarına uygulanmıştır. Deney gruplarında yer alan öğrenciler ödevlerini ağ üzerinden LON-CAPA (The Learning Online Network with a Computer-Assisted Personalized Approach) programı yardımıyla yaparken kontrol gruplarında yer alan öğrenciler ödevlerini geleneksel ev ödevi olarak yapmışlardır. Gruplarda yer alan öğrencilerin başarısı sadece ödevler ile değil aynı zamanda öğrencilerin sınav performansları da karşılaştırılarak incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre deney gruplarında yer alan öğrencilerin ödev performansı kontrol gruplarında yer alan öğrencilere göre yüksek bulunmuştur. Grupların sınav sonuçları incelendiğinde ise sonuçların birbirine yakın olduğu görülmüştür. Araştırma sonuçları genel olarak değerlendirildiği zaman, deney gruplarında yer alan öğrencilerin ödev performanslarının gerçek başarıyı yansıtmadığı ve ağ tabanlı ev ödevlerin öğrencilerin başarısına olumlu bir katkı sağlamadığı bulunmuştur.
GÖK, T. (2013). Comparison of the Effects of Web Based and Paper Based Homework on Students? Achievements. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 31–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/674627
Aladağ, C., & Doğu, S. (2009). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde verilen ödevlerin öğrenci görüşlerine gore değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21, 15-23.
Alexander, M., Bartlett, J. E., Truell, A. D., & Ouwenga, K. (2001). Testing in a computer technology course: An investigation of equivalency in performance between online and paper and pencil methods. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 18(1), 69-80.
Bauer, W., Benonson, W., & Westfall, G. D. (1992).
Multimedia Physics, CDROM. Bartlett, J. E., II, Reynolds, K A., & Alexander, M. W. (2000). A tool for online learning. Journal of Online Learning, 11(3&4), 22-24. Blackboard, http://www.blackboard.com/International/EMEA.aspx?lang=en-us Retrieved March 10, 2011.
Bonham, S. W., Titus, A., Beichner, R. J., & Martin, J. (2000). Education research using web-based assessment systems. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(1), 28Bonham, S., Beicher, R., & Deardorff, D. (2001). Online homework: Does it make a difference?. Physics Teacher, 39(5), 293-296.
Bonham, S. W., Deardorff, D. L., & Beichner, R. J. (2003). Comparison of student performance using web and paper-based homework in college level physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1050-1071.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları. Ankara:
Pegem Yayıncılık. Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally College Pub. Co. ClassNet, http://classnet.wcdsb.ca/Pages/about.aspx Retrieved March 10, 2011.
Demirci, N. (2006). Developing web-printed homework system to access student’s introductory physics course performance and compare to paper based homework. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 105-119.
Demirci, N. (2007). University students’ perceptions of web-based vs. paper-based homework in a general physics course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 29-34.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. London: D. C. Heath & Company. Heller, P. M., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem-solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem-solving. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 627-636.
Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 637-644. Heller,