Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Carbon Sequestration Analysis of dominant tree species using Geo-informatics Technology in Gujarat State (INDIA)

Pages
79–93
Publication Date
2017-05-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The total number of trees in Gandhinagar town is much higher as compared to Mahesana town; therefore estimated carbon store of dominant tree species in Gandhinagar town is very high as compared to Mahesana town which is more arid as compared to Gandhinagar.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Comparative analysis of carbon store of three dominant tree species in planned green capital city of Gandhinagar and unplanned industrial town of Mahesana in Gujarat State, India was carried out using geo-informatics technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The high spatial resolution Remote Sensing Satellite data from Indian Remote Sensing Satellite (IRS-Resourcesat-1) LISS-IV, Cartosat-1, and Google earth images were used in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The total number of trees in Gandhinagar town is much higher as compared to Mahesana town; therefore estimated carbon store of dominant tree species in Gandhinagar town is very high as compared to Mahesana town which is more arid as compared to Gandhinagar.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Carbon Sequestration · urban forestry · Total biomass

Abstract

Comparative analysis of carbon store of three dominant tree species in planned green capital city of Gandhinagar and unplanned industrial town of Mahesana in Gujarat State, India was carried out using geo-informatics technology. The selected three major dominant tree species grown in these towns are Azadirachta indica, Acacia sp. and Cassia sp. The high spatial resolution Remote Sensing Satellite data from Indian Remote Sensing Satellite (IRS-Resourcesat-1) LISS-IV, Cartosat-1, and Google earth images were used in this study. The tree cover was categorized into dense and sparse on the basis of canopy cover observed on Satellite data. A grid of 1km X 1km was created in GIS environment and superimposed on Cartosat-1 images. Random sample of 20 % was selected for detailed tree count in the field and total tree count was estimated from these selected sample grids. Total biomass and carbon sequestered in the major tree species have been estimated using a non-destructive method. The carbon stock estimated for three major tree species in Gandhinagar and Mahesana towns indicate that Azadirachta indica has maximum carbon sequestration potential as compared to Acacia sp. and Cassia sp. The maximum of carbon stock was present in Girth at Breast Height (GBH) size >180 cm which is followed by GBH size 90 to 180 cm. The total number of trees in Gandhinagar town is much higher as compared to Mahesana town; therefore estimated carbon store of dominant tree species in Gandhinagar town is very high as compared to Mahesana town which is more arid as compared to Gandhinagar.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARYA, A., NEGİ, S. S., KATHOTA, J. C., PATEL, A. N., KALUBARME, M. H., GARG, J. K. (2017). Carbon Sequestration Analysis of dominant tree species using Geo-informatics Technology in Gujarat State (INDIA). International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 79–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/672623

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Christensen, S., and Goudriaan, J., 1993. Deriving Light Interception and Biomass from Spectral Reflection ratio. Remote Sensing Environment 48:87-95.
  2. Gavali, R. S. And Shaikh, H. M. Y, 2016. Estimation of Carbon Storage in the Tree Growth of Solapur University Campus, Maharashtra, India. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Vol.5 (4): 2364–2367.
  3. Gazioğlu, C. and Okutan, V. (2016). Underwater Noise Pollution at the Strait of Istanbul (Bosphorus), International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO), Vol:3(3): 26-39.
  4. Gazioğlu, C., Müftüoğlu, AE., Demir, V., Aksu, A. and Okutan, V. (2015). Connection between Ocean Acidification and Sound Propagation, International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO), Vol.2(2):16-26.
  5. Goetz, S.J., Baccini, A., Laporte, NT., Johns, T., Walker, W., Kellndorfer, J., Houghton, RA. and Sun, M. (2009). Mapping and monitoring carbon stocks with satellite observations: A comparison of methods. Carbon Bal. Manag., 4: 2: 1-7.
  6. Hangarge, L. M., Kulkarni, D. K., Gaikwad, V. B., Mahajan, D. M., and Chaudhari, N. (2012). Carbon Sequestration potential of tree species in Somjaichi Rai (Sacred grove) at Nandghur village, in Bhor region of Pune District, Maharashtra State, India. Annals of Biological Research, Vol.3 (7): 3426-3429.
  7. Jaiswal, Dharmesh G., Patel, Chirag N., Patel, Yogesh B., Mankad, Archana U., and Pandya, Himanshu A., 2014. Regression Correlation Analysis between GBH and Carbon Stock of Major Tree Species in Dharoi Range, Gandhinagar Forest Division, India. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 3(11): 17146- 17149. Jeyanny, V., S.K. Balasundram and M.H.A. Husni, 2011. Geo-Spatial Technologies for Carbon Sequestration Monitoring and Management. American Journal of Environmental Sciences 7 (5): 456-462.
  8. Kaya Ş., Gazioğlu C., Sertel E., Şeker D.Z., Algancı U. (2015a). Rapid Determination Of Land Use/Cover Changes Using Data Fusion", ACRS 2015: The 36 th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing “Fostering Resilient Growth in Asia”, Metro Manila, Philippines, 19-23 September 2015: 1-5.
  9. Kaya, H. and Gazioğlu, C. (2015). Real Estate Development at Landslides, International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO), Vol.2(1):62-71.
  10. Kaya, Ş., Başar, UG., Karaca, M. and Şeker, DZ. (2012). Assessment of urban heat islands using remotely sensed data, Ekoloji, Vol. 21(84):107-113.
  11. Kaya, Ş., Osgouei, PE., Algancı, U., Şeker, DZ. And Gazioğlu,