Journals / International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

The need for ecosystem-based coastal planning in Trabzon city

Pages
193–205
Publication Date
2017-11-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended that single authority (composed of various specialists) must take the responsibility of coastal planning in the region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Coastal urbanization problem was emanated from willingness of coastal living.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Trabzon city has been under severe urbanization problem for the last 30 years due to migration from rural to coastal areas of the city.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended that single authority (composed of various specialists) must take the responsibility of coastal planning in the region.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Coastal Zone · Ecology · Urbanization

Abstract

Coastal urbanization problem was emanated from willingness of coastal living. Urban sprawl is one of the most important coastal problems in Turkey as it is in Trabzon city which is known for its natural and historical assets. In order to ensure the sustainability and ecological continuity of the city, an ecosystem based coastal planning is an issue of high priority. Protection and usage balance of the coastal areas could also ensure transition of the natural values to future generations. Trabzon city has been under severe urbanization problem for the last 30 years due to migration from rural to coastal areas of the city. It is thought that recently completed motorway and its service roads accelerated the urbanization on coastal periphery. Therefore, the problem must be resolved as soon as possible to achieve the good environmental status of the coast in the city. Thus, as a solution, DPSIR framework was proposed for systematic evaluation and documentation of the related critical issues by starting with a questionnaire composed of open ended questions for determination of major coastal problems in the city. As a step forward, the problems are quantitatively investigated and confirmed by using remote sensing techniques and census data compiled from TUIK databases. As a result major drivers were defined as "coastal urbanization", "coastal land filling" and "coastal transportation" for the city of Trabzon. It is recommended that single authority (composed of various specialists) must take the responsibility of coastal planning in the region. Moreover, the rights of the municipalities on the coastal zone must urgently be stopped by applying continues independent monitoring. Finally, taxation and land owning policies have to be revised on coastal areas to balance and encourage alternative city planning strategies.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİKHAN, M., GÜNEROĞLU, N., GÜNEROĞLU, A., KARSLI, F. (2017). The need for ecosystem-based coastal planning in Trabzon city. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 193–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/672618

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acar, C. and Güneroğlu, N. (2009). A Study on Linear Plant Compositions' Functionality, Visuality and Species Diversity Assessment in Trabzon City. Ekoloji, 18, 65-73.
  2. Ahern, J. (1995). Greenways as a planning strategy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33, 131-155.
  3. Akkaya, M., Gazioğlu, C., Yücel, Z. Y., Burak, S. (1998). “Kıyı Alanlarının Rasyonel Kullanımı ve Yönetiminde Kamu Yararı İlkesi”, Türkiye Kıyıları 98, (Ed: Özhan, E.), METU, Ankara: 39-47, 22-25 September 1998.
  4. Alphan, H. and Çelik N. (2016). Monitoring changes in landscape pattern: use of Ikonos and Quickbird images. Environmental Monitoring and Assesment, 188 (81). Antrop, M. (2001). The language of landscape ecologists and planners: A comparative analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning, 55, 163-173.
  5. Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future, Landscape and Urban Planning. 70, 21-34.
  6. Arendt, R. (2004). Linked landscapes creating greenway corridors through conservation subdivision design strategies in the northeastern and central United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68: 241-269.
  7. Atkins, J.P. Burdon, D. Elliott, M. and Gregory A.J. (2011). Management of the marine environment: Integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62, 215-226.
  8. Borja, A., Galparsoro, I., Solaun, O., Muxika, I., Tello, E.M., Uriarte, A and Valencia, V. (2006). The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR. A methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Sciences, 66, 84-96.
  9. Burak, S., Doğan, E. and Gazioğlu, C. (2004). Impact of urbanization and tourism on coastal environment. Ocean and Coastal Management, 47, 515-527.
  10. Cengiz, C. (2012). Ecological Landscape Planning, with a Focus on the Coastal Zone, Landscape Planning, Dr. Murat Ozyavuz (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0654-8,
  11. InTech. Chen LC, Rau JY (1998): Detection of shoreline changes for tideland areas using multi-temporal satellite images. Int. J. Remote Sensing 19: 3383-339. Council of Europe, (2000).
  12. The European Landscape Convention, Strasbourg CETSno: 176. Dihkan, M., Güneroğlu, N., Karsli, F., Güneroğlu, A. (2013). Remote sensing of tea plantations using an SVM classifier and pattern-based accuracy assessment technique. Int. J. Remote Sens., 34 (23), 8549-8565.
  13. Dronker, J. (2005). Dynamics of Coastal Systems. World Scientific Publishing,